News 'Beyond Big Thunder Mountain' Blue Sky concept revealed for Magic Kingdom

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
I’ll say it’s not necessarily the acreage, but what they do with it. It feels like a lot of SWGE is wasted and underutilized space
I'm of the opinion that the space is not wasted precisely because it is "wasted space."

TSL and Rat's alley are super crowded with guests because the attractions bring in thousands of people per hour. Well, where are they all going to go? They swamp all available open space.

But it's not like that with SWGE. The rides bring in over 4,000 guests per hour, but they don't have that over-crowded feel of TSL and Rat's alley.

SWGE is 14 acres [and TSL (including the TSMM buildings) is 11 acres]. If they're planning on two mini-lands (Phase 1 and 2), then it'll probably be overcrowded with 5-6 rides total. Better to stick with 4 or less.
 

Coaster Lover

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
No
As long as it's enough for marketing to call it, "the biggest expansion in Magic Kingdom Park history!"

That's marketing for you! Don't want to build it TOO big so that the next time you want to advertise something as the "biggest expansion ever" the scope is out of reach!
 

Kman

Well-Known Member
Bay Lake was actually there....now Seven Seas Lagoon is another matter...lol But your point is solid...nowadays they can't move a drainage ditch without a hundred environmental impact studies and a million dollars....
awww...dumb mistake! Correct!
 

eddie104

Well-Known Member
The target is 14 acres of new guest space.
That’s actually a good chunk of space and like someone said earlier it’s what they do with it that counts.

Then again this target can change in scope as well over the next couple of years as they design this project.
 

Delta-7

Active Member
I personally am not sure they would give access to the new land via a path between the railroad and the BTM backstage area, although I originally thought that was the only option other than a path by the Haunted Mansion. Perhaps it could be more like this? (unfortunately this scenario might affect Fort Langhorne).
 

Attachments

  • Beyond Big Thunder.png
    Beyond Big Thunder.png
    825.6 KB · Views: 163

Rich Brownn

Well-Known Member
I actually disagree. We were there recently and I commented to my wife that if MK was built today they never would have dug Bay Lake. Too expensive, no reason for it and shareholders would lose their $%!$. They would pave over it. I love the boats and monorail. It makes me feel like I am going to a totally different dimension in a way. We love the separatedness of it
There was another reason for the lake -- the dirt was use to bury the utilidoor underneath the MK
 

peter11435

Well-Known Member
I actually disagree. We were there recently and I commented to my wife that if MK was built today they never would have dug Bay Lake. Too expensive, no reason for it and shareholders would lose their $%!$. They would pave over it. I love the boats and monorail. It makes me feel like I am going to a totally different dimension in a way. We love the separatedness of it
I think it’s possible they would build a (probably smaller) lake, as they have done at other properties and hotels around the world. But there is zero chance they would not have parking facilities directly connected to the park.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom