Shaman
Well-Known Member
Ghostbuster626 said:I think its tacky and what does it have to do with California?
There are bugs in California. :lookaroun
Ghostbuster626 said:I think its tacky and what does it have to do with California?
objr said:There are bugs in California. :lookaroun
peter11435 said:I wouldn't compare WDSP and DCA. DCA is far better than WDSP. WDSP was built on the cheap. DCA was not built on the cheap any more so than AK or MGM. DCA has many problems but for the most part the park is solid and will continue to be developed. In ten years we won't even be having this discussion.
DCA was certainly cheaper than other things designed for that spot such as Westcot. But you can say that about everything. I can'd think of a single park or attraction built in the last 40 years that was not originaly planned to be much grander. Its the reach for the stars hope for the moon strategy.jimmybog said:Yes I admit DCA is better than WDSP but both parks were still built on the cheap. If you think that Disney planned to build Disney Seas, then decided to go for Westcot but instead built DCA, then that to me is going for the cheapest option. I know there were various reasons for doing this but it still shouldn't have happened. But at least with DCA there is room for improvement and possible expansion. With WDSP, it can be improved by tearing down existing attractions and rebuilding new ones but there is actually very little room for expansion. I actually see this park causing Disney problems for many years to come. I think it will take more than a Tower of terror ride to get the attendance up to reasonable leveles.
Anyway back to the original post about Beastly Kingdom. I found another piece of concept art for Beastly Kingdom last night and will try and post it tonight.
jimmybog said:Anyway back to the original post about Beastly Kingdom. I found another piece of concept art for Beastly Kingdom last night and will try and post it tonight.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.