Elaborate on this, I'm interested in what makes it one exactly.Tangled is basically a scene by scene remake of Beauty and the Beast.
Also...
People that say the story has been done before always bring up Dances with Wolves, Atlantis, and Pocahontas.
Why didn't anybody say "The story's been done before" when the SECOND released of those films came out?
Remember, most movies that are out have been rehashed ideas from other sources.
So glad to see someone else agreeing with my thought that the movie was merely Pocahontas + Atlantis + Fern Gully. I thought it was pretty, but certainly NOT original and not worth all the hype, or the Oscars.:shrug:
Also, the protagonist's name is Sully...and he's a blue kitty-like creature. My BF yells at the screen: "Kitty!" and I start laughing and mutter "Mike Wasowski!". Disney references are fun.:lol:
Tangled is basically a scene by scene remake of Beauty and the Beast.
Doesn't discredit it.
The reaction to hype is what fuels the dislike of Avatar. Same as Titanic. Do I like Titani?. No. Is it a better movie than almost every other disaster film ever made? Yes.
WHAT? I never realized the beast was longing to get out into the real world and feel that his life was an adventure just waiting to start and along the way falls in love with a handsome young thief.
Interesting.... I was convinced that I was watching Dances With Wolves in space...even their dialect was very 'native american' sounding....
I actually found the movie visually rewarding and plot/politically reprehensible. I'm so sick of big bad evil American corporations being depicted in reality and even now, fantasy....as the root of all evil. So not true!
The fact that Cameron even combined our so called big bad American military in with the evil corporate giant made it more reprehensible. Anyone serving in uniform shouldve been thoroughly disgusted after watching avatar.
I seriously hope neither Disney or uni touch this pile of dung of a movie with a 199 foot pole.....
Tangled is basically a scene by scene remake of Beauty and the Beast.
Doesn't discredit it.
The reaction to hype is what fuels the dislike of Avatar. Same as Titanic. Do I like Titani?. No. Is it a better movie than almost every other disaster film ever made? Yes.
Treasure Planet (although he didn't fall in love with a handsome young thief).
Cinderella (Longing to get into the real world...and fell in love with someone that she never thought she would (and vice versa)).
Aladdin (Basically Jasmine...and she did fall in love with a thief)
Those movies weren't being compared to Tangled. Im talking about Jimbo's statement that "Tangled is basically a scene by scene remake of Beauty and the Beast." The only part of that movie that I could see a similar connection is Flynn being stabbed through the end of that particular scene.
Back to the original topic.
Rumor has it that an Avatar attraction is being considered by Universal, however for Universal Studios Hollywood. As part of their revamping to their park in the next few years, Universal Studios Hollywood has considered replacing T2 3-D: Battle Across Time with a 4-D, immersive Avatar attraction. It is also said this is being looked at for Universal Studios Orlando, as well to draw guests away from the Harry Potter-hype at Islands of Adventure and bring them over to the original park at Universal Orlando to balance out the crowds.
Transformers is a part of this project.I have to doubt this rumor still a little bit.
The park is getting major overhaul work already and is going to be Opening Transformers. A huge original E ticket. The park's numbers are also up this year. I don't think they are going to be adding an Avatar Attraction.
The countering of Potter also makes no sense. An attraction does not pop up overnight and by the time it would be able to open and operate Potter's hype will have died down enough to make the crowds managable for the resort.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.