BJones82
Well-Known Member
I think you may have missed my point, apologies if not.
Chip and Sign is the less secure method against Chip and PIN. I thought it seems strange that they would choose the more expensive and less secure method when having to upgrade regardless.
Nope completely understood your statement, I am sure it is cheaper for retailers when it comes to fraud and sense most large retailers rent their pads in the U.S. the up front cost is not a huge issue. It may be more expensive for banks but retailers don't care, and they probably have a presence in Washington which means their voice is louder and more important than reason... We see this all the time here......