SteveAZee
Premium Member
I think it's a combination of factors. How many skilled workers do they have at any given time who can work on repairs? It's likely they have folks who are skilled in different aspects of maintenance and repair, rather than a Fix-It Felix (see what I did there?) who can do everything well. These folks have a lot of different attractions for which they are responsible and the work has to be prioritized. Safety is going to come before "show." Also, they have to look at the amount of work that each repair or bit of maintenance requires. Longer repairs are more likely to result in downtime for the attraction. Even if a repair is fairly minor, it is going to cost some money and their maintenance budget has to go toward a lot of attractions. It was easier, back in the day, when WDW only had a single park, to make sure that everything was constantly in tip-top condition. They've simply gotten too large for that to happen any more. It definitely has a detrimental effect to the level of quality in the parks, but it isn't going to change anytime soon. I think in most cases, they let things pile up and wait for a scheduled refurb that may or may not happen when it was originally scheduled. Kick the can down the road, so to speak. The only solution is to pour more money into staffing and maintenance budgeting, but that is definitely not going to happen while they're in the midst of so much construction. The result is that an attraction either 1) keeps falling apart until it becomes a safety issue, 2) keeps falling apart until it becomes a major PR issue 3) keeps falling apart until it develops a reputation as a "lame" attraction and goes on the chopping block, 4) enough of the attraction still functions to the point that most guests don't care, or 5) it lucks out and finally ends up at the top of the list for maintenance and repair. Obviously, the last outcome is the preferable one, but these days it also seems to be the least-likely outcome.
I'm incredibly relieved that SSE has finally been given the go-ahead for a major refurb, rather than a full replacement. I'm sorry that my wife won't get to experience it under optimum operation when she rides it for the first time, but the knowledge that improvements are on the horizon will definitely help me be more forgiving of its current state.
Good points. I would also suggest that in a large organization, the people responsible for the repair and maintenance of the attractions aren't directly connected to those who bear the brunt of guest complaints and park revenue... so mostly their job involves spending as little as possible.