• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

EPCOT Announced: Mary Poppins Attraction in UK Pavilion

UNCgolf

Well-Known Member
I did not intend for my suggestion to be any more graphic, or pro-hunting than what's depicted in said cartoon.

Ironically, in the movie it's the Mary Poppins outing that Mr Banks finds the least objectionable. 😅

My post was more about how you could have multiple, smaller outdoor attractions in that plot instead of spending a lot of money just to put one flat ride indoors.

I know you didn't -- I was just pointing out Disney likely wouldn't use that as a basis for an attraction if only for PR reasons.

But yeah, I agree. If they're not going to build a D or E ticket there, they'd be better off with multiple smaller attractions.
 

Tha Realest

Well-Known Member
Speaking of IP, Mary Poppins is one of Disney’s most enduring properties, it’s managed to escape (to date) modern day attempts to find it problematic, and it was one of Walt’s last creations. It’s really pretty abysmal that in 50 years the only real Mary Poppins presence in at WDW resort is an occasional meet and greet, some thematic touches at a resort, and pictures at the Boardwalk hotel of Julie Andrews wandering around the opening of the Magic Kingdom.
 

Disstevefan1

Well-Known Member
Speaking of IP, Mary Poppins is one of Disney’s most enduring properties, it’s managed to escape (to date) modern day attempts to find it problematic, and it was one of Walt’s last creations. It’s really pretty abysmal that in 50 years the only real Mary Poppins presence in at WDW resort is an occasional meet and greet, some thematic touches at a resort, and pictures at the Boardwalk hotel of Julie Andrews wandering around the opening of the Magic Kingdom.
Give the Twitter Mob some time they are busy canceling someone or something at the moment.
 

Magenta Panther

Well-Known Member
Speaking of IP, Mary Poppins is one of Disney’s most enduring properties, it’s managed to escape (to date) modern day attempts to find it problematic, and it was one of Walt’s last creations. It’s really pretty abysmal that in 50 years the only real Mary Poppins presence in at WDW resort is an occasional meet and greet, some thematic touches at a resort, and pictures at the Boardwalk hotel of Julie Andrews wandering around the opening of the Magic Kingdom.
Plus it was a world-wide box-office hit and scored a mess of awards. Cinematically, it's probably Walt's crown jewel. It holds up beautifully to this day. It deserves a land of its own. A dark ride, shops, restaurants - all of that. (Although I don't know if today's Imagineers are up to doing a good job of it.) It's funny that Disney's version of Alice in Wonderland gets more theme park presence than Poppins, given that the former didn't achieve anything like the success of the latter. The lack of Poppins in the parks, as you say, is abysmal indeed. And with the soulless dunderhead Iger in charge of the company, we'll probably never see Walt's best film get anything like its due. Tragic.
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
Give the Twitter Mob some time they are busy canceling someone or something at the moment.
It's been discussed in this thread that there is indeed something mildly problematic in MP with a minor character (and I'm not talking about the crazy claims which were universally dismissed). But no where near as problematic as Travers' original books.

But it's a movie of its times and hardly worse than most movies released around the same time.
 

Disstevefan1

Well-Known Member
It's been discussed in this thread that there is indeed something mildly problematic in MP with a minor character (and I'm not talking about the crazy claims which were universally dismissed). But no where near as problematic as Travers' original books.

But it's a movie of its times and hardly worse than most movies released around the same time.
It's too bad they didn't play the "a movie of its times" card to save Splash.
 

EPCOTCenterLover

Well-Known Member
Plus it was a world-wide box-office hit and scored a mess of awards. Cinematically, it's probably Walt's crown jewel. It holds up beautifully to this day. It deserves a land of its own. A dark ride, shops, restaurants - all of that. (Although I don't know if today's Imagineers are up to doing a good job of it.) It's funny that Disney's version of Alice in Wonderland gets more theme park presence than Poppins, given that the former didn't achieve anything like the success of the latter. The lack of Poppins in the parks, as you say, is abysmal indeed. And with the soulless dunderhead Iger in charge of the company, we'll probably never see Walt's best film get anything like its due. Tragic.
Speaking of Alice in Wonderland comparisons, I wish they use Poppins to create a "mini-land" in the UK, similar to what Disneyland has with Alice. That part of Fantasyland is so charming and well done.
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
I'm sure some (internally and externally) view Disney as far more important and powerful than Norway. So... "magical" nation > "sovereign" nation?



 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom