Animatronics: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly

Well, I partly agree. I have been on both, but Disneyland's version really never had much of a story. I'm one of the few who actually watched the original Song Of The South, and WDW version really does it justice. I love how the best scenes are carried out by the amazing animatronics. The very first time I went on it, I was confused at the drop. I then realized that I was Brer Rabbit being thrown into the briar patch!
View attachment 164972
Disneyland version doesn't resemble Brer Fox

View attachment 164974
WOW
I've seen the actual movie as well. I don't think a ride has to be 100% accurate to be good. And also, I don't think it's really fair to compare what Disneyland's Br'er Fox animatronics look like to Disney World's, because in all fairness Disney in general isn't very accurate with Br'er Fox. I mean, look at his walk around. The colors are completely off, and in official art they mess him up as well. Also I don't understand why you brought up the story, because both rides tell the same story, just with a different soundtrack.
 

Chef Mickey

Well-Known Member
For it's purpose I think that the Kong** one built decades ago that did work was just as good and wasn't hidden in a haze of light and speed. I probably didn't get the opportunity to see the Yeti enough to get the full appreciation for it, but, what I saw went by faster then the speed of light so by the time it registered I was getting off the ride.
Found at Universal BLEEP years ago.
The execution of the Yeti was far better. Still the greatest attraction experience I've had ever.
 

Goofyernmost

Well-Known Member
The execution of the Yeti was far better. Still the greatest attraction experience I've had ever.
Simply a matter of opinion. I know that I escorted two mentally challenged brothers both in their 50's to Universal. Granted they weren't operating on a very mature level, but, when we got to that part I thought that they were going to die. They did too! That was something you didn't pass by at breakneck speed. It was right in your face and for quite sometime in theme park ride time. It was very real feeling even for those of us that knew better. Probably why it left such a lasting impression on me. The Yeti may well have had more range of motion when it was in motion, but, the time you got to experience it was a very small window. When I compare the two Kong wins hands down for me.
 

Chef Mickey

Well-Known Member
Simply a matter of opinion. I know that I escorted two mentally challenged brothers both in their 50's to Universal. Granted they weren't operating on a very mature level, but, when we got to that part I thought that they were going to die. They did too! That was something you didn't pass by at breakneck speed. It was right in your face and for quite sometime in theme park ride time. It was very real feeling even for those of us that knew better. Probably why it left such a lasting impression on me. The Yeti may well have had more range of motion when it was in motion, but, the time you got to experience it was a very small window. When I compare the two Kong wins hands down for me.
Did you ever see the yeti in full A-Mode action? It only functioned properly a very short time.
 

Goofyernmost

Well-Known Member
Did you ever see the yeti in full A-Mode action? It only functioned properly a very short time.
Yes, I did and I blinked and almost missed it. It was good, I'm not debating that. I'm also not debating the fact that it had a range of motion that was unsurpassed, however, the experience was so short, even before it went all Disco on us, that I am hard pressed to feel all that impressed by it. Now perhaps if we had stopped and spent some time watching him move and reach out to get us, I might change my mind, but, perhaps one of the reasons that they haven't bothered to fix it is that even they realize that it is wasted technology considering the amount of exposure it actually got per rider. I'm glad you liked it, I just wasn't all that charged up by it. To me doing that or strobe lighting is almost the same individual affect.
 

brb1006

Well-Known Member
Well, I partly agree. I have been on both, but Disneyland's version really never had much of a story. I'm one of the few who actually watched the original Song Of The South, and WDW version really does it justice. I love how the best scenes are carried out by the amazing animatronics. The very first time I went on it, I was confused at the drop. I then realized that I was Brer Rabbit being thrown into the briar patch!
View attachment 164972
Disneyland version doesn't resemble Brer Fox

View attachment 164974
WOW
Also why does Brer Rabbit's fur keep changing from brown to grey?
 

Goofyernmost

Well-Known Member
Also why does Brer Rabbit's fur keep changing from brown to grey?
He got old. It happens we get old, we get grey. Rabbits are not inclined to head for the Miss Clairol. Since he is a fictional character that was never really identified as being of a specific color, why are you trying to make an issue out of it when there more then likely is none.
 

Johnny Three-hats

Active Member
Say what you will about Splash Mountain's Br'er characters, the figures made specifically for SM, but I think that the America Sings figures and their WDW clones still look incredibly organic. The geese in the introduction in particular don't look like robots to me, they look like fluffy, anthropomorphic geese. Same with the gators and the chickens in the finale. I especially love the vultures, though, they are just as menacing and deliciously sinister as ever, especially in WDW where they have their hats in tact.

As for other good animatronics, Hopper in It's Tough to be a Bug has always impressed me with his sheer size and complexity. I distinctly remember seeing him as a young child, but I hadn't realized exactly how much he towers over the audience and how smooth his motions are. Ooh, or the carnotaurus figures in Dinosaur. I remember being on that ride in the seat closest to the thing and barely having the guts to look at that thing, it was so big and real and intimidating. Or even the dinosaurs at Universe of Energy. Outdated as they may be, I still think they're breathtaking and I'd be very sad to see them go.

I can't think of any really bad animatronics that haven't already been said, but as for ugly animatronics? The squid in Les Mysteres du Nautilus over in DLP. It's not technically ugly, but I am absolutely terrified of squids and its ugly mug isn't helping at all. Not to mention that I'm not sure if enough people have been subjected to its presence and I want more people to see it.
iu
 

EagleScout610

This time of year I become rather Grinchy
Premium Member
A bump, but:
Best- Yeti (pre-disco)
Worst- DL's Br'er Fox and Br'er Bear. Br'er Fox doesn't resemble himself and Br'er Bear looks painfully fake
Ugly- Many of the GMR AA's. I just don't like realistic AAs. Messes with me big time
 

ABQ

Well-Known Member
Best would be a tie between the late Alec Tronic


or the stair climbing Ben Franklin in the American Adventure


Worst would be the munchkins in the Great Movie Ride. They are the things nightmares are made of.
 

RobotWolf

Well-Known Member
A lot of these "low quality" bots begin life as static statues in a central shop-type location. They are cut apart and some very simple mechanics are installed; mostly without any show sync at all. They just have to be plugged in and they're good to go. Sound like a cheap "alternative," but I'd prefer minimal movement to none at all.

A few notable mentions of animatronic excellence:

The civil war family scene in The American Adventure. The sight-line alignment between the characters and the programming make this extremely memorable. Trivia: There are TWO Imagineers in this scene; both in bot and picture format. (I'll give you a hint: they argue the whole scene.) The scene where the family receives the coffin of the fallen son was filmed at a Disneyland train station. ("apparently", I'd love confirmation on this)

In fact, there's so much amazing showmanship in The American Adventure, I'll just refer to any of Marni's (freaking amazing) videos on the subject.

Sindbad's Storybook Voyage is definitely something you should look up if you like bots.

I've never seen it, personally, but anyone who's been to DisneySea says the lava monster bot is without parallel. It seems too quick of a look to be that impressive. But it always, consistently, described as "amazing." (I wonder if Croc-bot in China will have the same "you gotta be there" showmanship.) I think it may boil down to "focus." The ability for a bot to really look like he's focused on you. It's one thing for glowing eyes in the dark to be looking at you. But it's a little more scary when your presence prompts that focus. (See La Taniere du Dragon)

Being an animatronic fan first, I am able to appreciate the art in all its forms. Therefore bots like Stitch certainly rank "up there" but I look forward to when he joins Sonny Eclipse. (But I fear for S.I.R.)
 

fractal

Well-Known Member
Hands down the most awe inspiring, captivating AA currently in the parks is Lumier at Enchanted Tales with Belle. If you have not seen it then I cannot recommend highly enough that you need to. Even if you don't have kids then swallow your pride and do it just for the experience. Additionally all of the AA's at The American Experience are top notch as well and not to be missed.

Agree on both counts. The way they switch scenes in the American Adventure is also impressive.

I also consider Hopper in ITTBAB as one of the best.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom