Ratatouille was good. Wall-e should have never made it out of conceptual and whoever thought it up should have been fired.
Wall-E was great and made over half a Billion dollars.
Ratatouille was good. Wall-e should have never made it out of conceptual and whoever thought it up should have been fired.
And cigarettes kill people, so what's your point?Wall-E was great and made over half a Billion dollars.
And cigarettes kill people, so what's your point?
I agree. The incredibles could have all kinds of sequals and keep new story lines as compared to toy story and a bunch of toys obsessed with remaining relevant.Stephen King said he wanted to do a sequel to all his biggest works, there's definitely always more story that can be told, unless you blow up the entire universe, but it is curious that they still haven't gotten to an Incredibles 2 yet, I know they're waiting on Brad Bird, but you think they'd push harder to try to bring him something.
Anyone see this?
http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/364103/20120717/toy-story-4-monsters-finding-nemo-2.htm
Although the Finding Nemo news kinda made me roll my eyes, the prospect of a 4th Toy Story makes me want to smash my head into a wall. What I can't tell is if the article is has a legitimate and recent source regarding a 4th Toy Story, or if they just lumped the recent Nemo news on top of the Monsters University trailer and what Tom Hanks mumbled about a month ago to create an article about "3 Pixar sequels".
I agree. The incredibles could have all kinds of sequals and keep new story lines as compared to toy story and a bunch of toys obsessed with remaining relevant.
Absolutely. There is so much Marvel product out there that is not a part of UNI. Plus they could create new stuff. There is so much potential.Especially now that they have Marvel and the 3rd and 4th tier heroes and villains in their catalogue, it would be a good way to get some of them higher exposure to hopefully launch more films.
I hadn't heard about toy story 4, I would love that!Anyone see this?
http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/364103/20120717/toy-story-4-monsters-finding-nemo-2.htm
Although the Finding Nemo news kinda made me roll my eyes, the prospect of a 4th Toy Story makes me want to smash my head into a wall. What I can't tell is if the article is has a legitimate and recent source regarding a 4th Toy Story, or if they just lumped the recent Nemo news on top of the Monsters University trailer and what Tom Hanks mumbled about a month ago to create an article about "3 Pixar sequels".
So, wait, between now and the potential "sequel" for Finding Nemo, we're getting at least two brand new concepts from Pixar (The Good Dinosaur and the yet to be titled one inside the child's mind) and because they may return to the Nemo universe, people all over the place (outside of here more than on here) are burying Pixar???
Why are sequels so terrible? Anyone remember Toy Story 2 and Toy Story 3? Each sequel better than the last.
If they announce that it's another movie where Nemo gets lost and they have to go find him again, basically retell the first, ok, I can understand trepidation. If they decide that these are beloved characters with a whole new story to tell, I'll give them the benefit of the doubt.
I see it as a problem because it could signify Pixar's diminished standing as a studio that makes principally artistic decisions. The original Nemo and Toy Story 3 each featured endings with a very high sense of "closure," which would have derived from an artistic decision to close them that way. A sequel to either likely indicates that a non-artistic incentive ($$$$) overcame that decision. That's problematic because most of Pixar's best films, such as Up, Ratatouille, and Wall-E, were all developed from concepts that seemed quirky or even downright unmarketable, and yet those are the movies that got Pixar the level of respect they have today. Pixar thinking with their wallet instead of their gut/heart could mark the end of the values that made them great.
I see it as a problem because it could signify Pixar's diminished standing as a studio that makes principally artistic decisions. The original Nemo and Toy Story 3 each featured endings with a very high sense of "closure," which would have derived from an artistic decision to close them that way. A sequel to either likely indicates that a non-artistic incentive ($$$$) overcame that decision. That's problematic because most of Pixar's best films, such as Up, Ratatouille, and Wall-E, were all developed from concepts that seemed quirky or even downright unmarketable, and yet those are the movies that got Pixar the level of respect they have today. Pixar thinking with their wallet instead of their gut/heart could mark the end of the values that made them great.
Pixar needs to stop with the sequels before their product gets tainted. There was no reason for a cars sequel and there's absolutly no reason for the new monsters inc movie either (and I'm honestly not that excited about it, especially after seeing the trailer). And I honestly hope they don't make Toy Story 4. The third one was a fantastic conclusion. The shorts they've been making however are fantastic and I would like to see more of those.
And I agree with the others on here, of all the sequels pIxar makes I have no idea why the incredibles keeps getting the shaft. There's so much potential! And I wanna see more of Edna Mode!
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.