1. On a side note (and back to my earlier point regarding IASW) I was able to track down the episode of Alex's podcast with his friend Matt, where Alex discussed a proposed idea to move IASW north from where it's currently located, as apart of a fantasyland expansion. Now, this episode stems from a "rumor" micechat was running with last year in June, which I'm sure a handful of you are familiar with, but that's not important here. The reason I'm bringing this up, is because Alex mentioned that he has a source
(I'm assuming in WDI) who let him in on a few proposals on what to do with IASW if a future fantasyland expansion were to come to fruition. One of those proposals involved a complete removal of the attraction from the park, which just seems like the most ludicrous thing TWDC could possibly do. I can understand if WDI pitched a permeant overlay of the attraction (even that's a bit extreme), but a complete removal of the original IASW from the original park is one way to alienate guests, because its both ludicrous to do such a thing, but it also won't provide the proper financial return they'd be looking for. I mean, what would you even replace the attraction with anyways? Whoever seriously suggested they remove the attraction completely shouldn't be working with WDI in the first place. Anyways, because I'm sure most of you are baffled that I'm bringing up something from last year, I'm simply curious as to whether Alex's source is legitimate or even exists. Now, make no mistake, I'm not trying to make him look bad, but it just doesn't seem realistic to me that they'd even go through with something like this. In other words, I'd like to get someone to verify Alex's source.
SIDE NOTE: Yes, I understand COVID has delayed everything, so therefore any plans to alter or remove IASW are probably off the table. I'm simply curious as to whether Alex's source is legitimate. So again, if any of you have information on this, I'd be interested to hear about it. Until then, I advise everyone to take this with a grain of salt. I'm simply bringing this up out of curiosity, not to spread fallacy.
Here is the episode in which this is discussed:
2.
Sorry if I came across short or snippy. Wasn't my intent. I'm simply saying that approach will get some responses. Maybe that's what you wanted though.
With that said, you mention a list of 4 core attractions, but wouldn't Peter Pan's Flight be considered core? What about Dumbo?
No worries. In terms of Pan and Dumbo, I'd say they'll most likely remain in the park, due to the fact that they don't necessarily take up any prime real estate, and they're still popular among guests. I think its important that I mention I'm referring to DLR's Pan and Dumbo, but I think the same can be said (maybe to a lesser extent) for MK.