And once again, you're ignoring the fact that other characters Disney has purchased the rights to (as opposed to owning them outright) were interpreted in the Disney style and thus a version of them was created that is wholly Disney's. To the public, the characters seem to be Disney's because in a very real sense they ARE Disney's. The passage of time has nothing to do with it; the public thinks those characters are Disney's because Disney put so much of its own creativity and craft into them. And that is very different, by the way, from merely buying some foreign entity and, with no attempt to create a Disney version, simply inserting them into the parks, advertising, etc. It's jarring to say the least and, to my mind, crass and creatively bankrupt. Worse, it violates the spirit of Walt's legacy. It's a base corporate move and nothing more.