sweetpee_1993
Well-Known Member
Agreed. The problem is the Disney name is attached on either coast. Not just to the food specifically, it's an overall concept for all aspects of the parks product: product inconsistency breeds brand distrust. Once upon a time product consistency created a reputation second to none. Now it's the exact opposite.so just a comment on that...I think it's something that WDW can get away with because we don't know any better. Most of the "finer diner establishments" are filled with people burning 2 dining credits from their free dining plan anyway and can't tell the difference prime rib and a strip steak. I'm not sure that Disneyland could get away with charging top dollar for a meal and not deliver upon a top-notch experience. Californians are kind of food snobs! I do think that i get more value for my money from a sit-down meal at Disneyland than at Walt Disney World.
We did eat at Carthay Circle for dinner as well. We all agreed it was an overall worthwhile experience. I only bit for the WoC package, tho. If it hadn't been for that I still would've walked on by.
The lunch we had at Blue Bayou was decent in proportion to our expectations. Overpriced, yes, but not bad. Not exceptional. We went in expecting meh, tho. I only did that one because one of my boys asked for it. I strategically didn't do dinner because of my distrust of Disney's cuisine. I'm telling you, its kinda a theme with me. LOL!
Best Disney meal I've had in terms of food quality? Remy. But the 3+ hour experience isn't all that. I'd eat a Remy level meal every night of vacation regardless of where we are if I was certain it'd be worth the cost and under 2 hours.
Not trusting of the Californians' palate. They love their In-n-Out and even 3 months later I'm still trying to grasp the concept of a burger without mayo. Or fries with a vomit-looking substance on it. LOL!