DisneyHead123
Well-Known Member
Yeah I thought it was a fascinating tidbit!Very interesting. Especially with how much Disney has pivoted towards showcasing food and gluttony.
Yeah I thought it was a fascinating tidbit!Very interesting. Especially with how much Disney has pivoted towards showcasing food and gluttony.
Anecdotal only, after about 3 months I don’t notice any overall lack of spending on consumer goods/merch/souvenirs. Certainly food spending gets massively cut. There just isn’t a desire, for snack, or heavy meals. I find it also cuts way down on drinking spending. Some is just the idea of not wanting the “wasted” alcohol calories, but there is also a lack of desire to drink.
Because I’m handicapped and switched my seats to the handicapped “platform”, I didn’t have to pay a PSL…but when you figure the parking, transportation (fuel) costs, it got up there…Season tickets…should be WAY more than a Disney trip
Soft drinks? Beer? Glass of wine? All of the above? Haha
Attributed to price increases and cost cutsThey did record numbers - with fairly deeply discounted hotel rooms. Hope they made that connection.
Ok…per hourThe original argument is that a days worth of a Disney park is a better value for entertainment per hour (assuming that entertainment is equal to you) than anything else. A broadway play, and NFL game, a Taylor Swift concert whatever.
The argument is not used to justify the cost, it's used to say that the alternatives are just as expensive.
Because they aren’t comparable products…at allSeason tickets gets you 8/9 home games, at around 3 hours each. It comes with no food, no drinks, no transpiration to/from. Stadium, and lets you watch something that you could watch for free from home .
Why should 24-27 hours of entertainment through season tickets to football be WAY more than a week long trip to Disney? Is it something something “value?”
Except I the vacationer do care, a show or game that lasts 3-4 hours means that I have to find something else to do the rest of the day (which almost always costs me money.) When I go to a theme park, almost always, that’s the only thing I do that day.Ok…per hour
However they can’t price it based on per hour…which a concert, sporting event or show can do because they don’t have to care
But they are, they are all competing for your discretionary spend, and discretionary time. Most Americans have precious little time off, most of these events require you to have an entire day off to attend.Because they aren’t comparable products…at all
But they are, they are all competing for your discretionary spend, and discretionary time. Most Americans have precious little time off, most of these events require you to have an entire day off to attend.
They are legally required not to lie. Spending is up, and onsite hotel occupancy is high. Putting observation in with those figures probably means that if attendance is down (which they didn’t report so it could) it’s the lower margin guest who stays off site who aren’t showing up.I don't believe a word. There are tons of evidence, beginning with the waiting times for attractions and even videos and pictures that show that the parks are half empty. I don't know where they get these numbers from. But I don't believe them.
They’ve limited DAS and apparently re-worked the LL/standby ratios to shorten standby wait times.I don't believe a word. There are tons of evidence, beginning with the waiting times for attractions and even videos and pictures that show that the parks are half empty. I don't know where they get these numbers from. But I don't believe them.
How dare you! Im showing up with ears on! Haha.it’s the lower margin guest who stays off site who aren’t showing up.
Lie is strong…trying to downplay difficulties is not illegalI don't believe a word. There are tons of evidence, beginning with the waiting times for attractions and even videos and pictures that show that the parks are half empty. I don't know where they get these numbers from. But I don't believe them.
Nope.They are legally required not to lie. Spending is up, and onsite hotel occupancy is high. Putting observation in with those figures probably means that if attendance is down (which they didn’t report so it could) it’s the lower margin guest who stays off site who aren’t showing up.
So what you’re saying is…they’re not comparable. We’re in the ballpark (finally)Except I the vacationer do care, a show or game that lasts 3-4 hours means that I have to find something else to do the rest of the day (which almost always costs me money.) When I go to a theme park, almost always, that’s the only thing I do that day.
Aren't you the one who was just recently over in the other thread telling me that you are a Crescent Lake addict who has found himself around Seven Seas Lagoon a lot recently? Seems to me that for all your protestations, you apparently still spend a lot of time at Walt Disney World. Why not just enjoy it and stop trying to convince the rest of us we're getting a raw deal?So what you’re saying is…they’re not comparable. We’re in the ballpark (finally)
So $1000 and hour for Tay just doesn’t translate to the charge you get at 3 am for the pillow to catch the drool at pop century 7 straight nights…or the 8 am Mickey spin to go into a gate to go on rides…which are always the same except for minor hiccups against Bob’s will once every three years or so?
-Never stayed at Pop CenturySo what you’re saying is…they’re not comparable. We’re in the ballpark (finally)
So $1000 and hour for Tay just doesn’t translate to the charge you get at 3 am for the pillow to catch the drool at pop century 7 straight nights…or the 8 am Mickey spin to go into a gate to go on rides…which are always the same except for minor hiccups against Bob’s will once every three years or so?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.