I thought in the initial announcement they talked about Carsland....and then after Carsland they would then begin creating Villainsland...but that would push the beginning construction for Villains to 2030 with a completion date of 2034-5?
Pity - that could have been really cool; and nice to have it next to Space Mountain's Horizons callbacks as wellYeah but the talks of it cooled off in the weeks leading up to it. It was probably just an idea kicked around for general QOL and fanservice
Why??Why wouldn't they be doing both at the same time? They indicated that work has begun on all the projects and that everything announced is planned to be completed within 5 years.
I'm not saying they will keep to that schedule, but it seems to be the intent and it is certainly a plausible timeline if they wanted.
Why??
Fixed CAPEX expenditures.
They seem to only want to spend a fixed amount for construction per month. If you build 2 projects at once, they will take 2x as long to complete.
Yup — setting clear expectations for the market.But they are increasing their Capex spend. That's kind of the entire point of the "we'll be spending $60B on the parks division in the next 10 years" announcement.
Yes - but 2025's film slate is worrying... but WDW should benefit from increased travel to Orlando next year. (Even if people skip a WDW park or two, Disney's hotels should benefit).So I was just thinking... I know many of us are jittery about how the financial state of the company can impact decisions to cut funding or value engineer projects. And the stock price not doing well has me on edge a bit as to whether the planned parks investment will be cut.
But I will say that the recent movie successes (Inside Out 2, Deadpool & Wolverine, now Aliens) means that that division will be healthier in the shorter term. and with streaming collectively turning a profit last quarter, can we be optimistic that they will let investments in the parks happen rather than siphoning off that profits there to support other branches of the company? The parks alone generate enough net profit to find the $6B/year that they planned.
i dont think so....it was gonna be a capacity and maintenance nightmareMaybe GE will reconsider the 3rd ride and put it into the park.
View attachment 810754
Maybe then add a "speeder chase" as depicted in the trading cards...i dont think so....it was gonna be a capacity and maintenance nightmare
From an online source:
- For a typical new thrill ride or dark ride attraction, the construction timeline is often 3-5 years. This allows for the design, engineering, fabrication, and installation of the ride systems, show elements, and supporting infrastructure
- Larger, more complex attractions like roller coasters or dark ride-based lands can take 4-6 years to complete. Projects like the new Star Wars: Galaxy's Edge land at Disney's Hollywood Studios took around 5 years from announcement to opening.
- Expansions to existing lands, such as adding a new ride or show to an established area, usually require 2-3 years for design, permitting, and construction
Yes, I'm puzzled why people are insisting he said all of this would be completed in 5 years when he clearly didn't: it's right there on YouTube for anyone who wants to watch it.I just went and re-watched the panel. At the end Josh D'Amaro says after recapping 'The New Lands, Attractions, Shows, Ships, and A Whole New Digital Universe'
"I can't wait for you to see these projects start to come to life over the next five years"
The ships won't be ready till 2031 but they are among the things starting to come to life over the next five years.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.