threvester
Well-Known Member
I rode this morning..didnt notice the tower, but did notice the ending..it was the mickey and friends that caught my eye.. I went in not knowing anything changed
They should have taken the Space 220 Space elevator method of just rendering a cloud located conveniently over future world, or whatever nonsense they call it now.This is a positive change, let's acknowledge it as such.
It’s been well established since the 50th that they would be permanentThe beacons on Spaceship Earth.
Which actually makes me wonder why that hasn’t been updated yet eitherThey should have taken the Space 220 Space elevator method of just rendering a cloud located conveniently over future world, or whatever nonsense they call it now.
Yeah, agreed. But it's even more permanent now haha.It’s been well established since the 50th that they would be permanent
Very true. They really do to fix those lights.Fair. And it was an opportunity to put more CGI into the movie with those working lights in the center spine.
End of an era. Sniff.I miss the bent Effiel Tower.
We’re about a year or two away from a movement to bring back the Bent Eiffel Tower cut.I miss the bent Effiel Tower.
Video -
I don't mind CGI if it isn't noticeable. What IS noticeable CGI are the figures progressing toward you--plane, elephant, orca, kite, screeching hawk, etc.--that create the transition to the next scene. Those I can do without.Feel free to roast me but I have very little issue with the use of CGI in the current film
Watch the posted video.Much better but I still wish that you would approach EPCOT from the north and have the fireworks going off in their natural position.
Misleading? It's a video of the show - nothing else.Slightly misleading video. It's shot from a central position anyway, there is nothing that is bent, so the original scene would have looked OK too.
No, it couldn’t have been improved. No “distortion correction” would have addressed the issue, because it’s simply unavoidable with the kind of curved screen they use. The only way around the problem was what they’ve just done: replacing the footage entirely.And it could have been improved - but when you start off with such a mess, the end result would never had been good outcome either.. so why bother fixing it partially.. and still have hot garbage because you created a scene that would never look good in a dome that can't use full distortion correction because of the multi-viewer position setup...
I mean, it’s not like you’re using your energy any more productively! We’re all here engaged in the same pretty useless activity!The stuff you all spend energy on sometimes is... I can't even describe.
No, it couldn’t have been improved. No “distortion correction” would have addressed the issue, because it’s simply unavoidable with the kind of curved screen they use. The only way around the problem was what they’ve just done: replacing the footage entirely.
You’re describing how the screen works anyway. There is only one ideal viewing point—the middle seat of the middle glider. The further out you move from that point, the more distorted the image will appear. All the footage is equally prone to this distortion and always has been (California was no better in this regard), even if some shots look worse than others.You can't correct that much distortion for different perspectives concurrently over such extreme different viewing angles. So you could make it right for one person, but the guy 2 gliders over and up.. would see that correction differently than the perspective you fixed.
It isn't fixed. It is still off.You are being pedantic - they fixed the effiel tower scene by changing the scene. Full stop.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.