News Impressions de France only available for limited time in the mornings

DKampy

Well-Known Member
I can’t believe anyone thinks if Walt owned Frozen, he would have opted to make Maelstrom instead. It was made out of necessity because there was nothing else.
I have nostalgia for many past EPCOT Center attractions(Horizons, original Imagination, WOM, and even Kitchen Cabernet, but I don’t get the love for Maelstrom… it was a weird disjointed ride… Frozen IMO is much better
 

Jenny72

Well-Known Member
I am sort of an Epcot purist, and really hate the IP stuff and the singalong, but I admit that I am also a visitor that doesn't get excited about seeing films in theme parks anymore. Especially after being stuck home during Covid, conducting lots of meetings virtually, etc. I am staring at a screen in one form or the other so often that I want to do things that are more tangible or interactive.

What I wish they would do with some of the less popular film experiences is to turn them into an innovative, interactive experience or exhibit about the country. I'm no imagineer, but something with a few animatronics, a guide, even a group trivia game or something. I'm sure they can come up with creative ideas (or could, if they tried). My impression is that people are craving that sort of experience now, especially since we can often watch amazing cinematography at home. In my opinion, that would be a far better way to get more people interested in the pavillions than slapping some movie character on it.
 

JohnD

Well-Known Member
Next project: Update the film with fresh 4K footage. Keep a lot of what's there location-wise, just update things. Maybe even throw in a brief shot of DLP if it would get the expenditure for new footage and projectors approved. (I know it's not as easy/simple as that, work with me here)
A more recent wedding couple. Bicyclists riding modern bicycles. Show Notre Dame in the midst of restoration.
 

MrPromey

Well-Known Member
In just a few days you all got Disney to course correct on this.

What’s our next objective?
Get Bob to stop wearing the sweaters and Josh to knock it off with the skinny jeans.

Maybe to keep things consistent, ToTBellHop should once again, register his complaint in French.
 
Last edited:

doctornick

Well-Known Member
I am sort of an Epcot purist, and really hate the IP stuff and the singalong, but I admit that I am also a visitor that doesn't get excited about seeing films in theme parks anymore. Especially after being stuck home during Covid, conducting lots of meetings virtually, etc. I am staring at a screen in one form or the other so often that I want to do things that are more tangible or interactive.

What I wish they would do with some of the less popular film experiences is to turn them into an innovative, interactive experience or exhibit about the country. I'm no imagineer, but something with a few animatronics, a guide, even a group trivia game or something. I'm sure they can come up with creative ideas (or could, if they tried). My impression is that people are craving that sort of experience now, especially since we can often watch amazing cinematography at home. In my opinion, that would be a far better way to get more people interested in the pavillions than slapping some movie character on it.
I think that’s valid WRT IDF but other films like the Circle Vision hold up better because of how the experience is different from what you can do at home or locally.
 

UNCgolf

Well-Known Member
I have nostalgia for many past EPCOT Center attractions(Horizons, original Imagination, WOM, and even Kitchen Cabernet, but I don’t get the love for Maelstrom… it was a weird disjointed ride… Frozen IMO is much better

I think a lot of it is just due to fit. Frozen is an IP ride with no relation to Norway (in the attraction itself), whereas Maelstrom was at least about Norway.

I personally don't have any special love for Maelstrom (it was mediocre), but fit aside, I still think it was a better attraction than FEA. FEA has some really nice AAs, but huge parts of that ride are empty/barren -- almost like they forgot to finish building it -- and it doesn't really make any sense.
 

MerlinTheGoat

Well-Known Member
Aside from the fact that it's actually appropriate for the location, Maelstrom had significantly higher quality set design and detailed artwork painting into the backgrounds. Far less barren, empty and flat than Frozen. The AA's didn't have those horrible facial projections either.

maelstrom-viking-ship-epcot-M.jpg

maelstrom_frozenolaf2016ww.jpg


There were instances where Maelstrom's scenery had lapses as well (the plain blank wall and door transitioning into the three headed troll room, which Frozen also failed to address). But it was still a lot more consistent and far more beautifully designed than Frozen overall (like the entirety of the backwards portion and final drop). The layered painted details were exceptional and made great use of traditional and convincing forced perspective techniques. Making it appear as if sets were much larger than they really were and reaching far into the distance. Tirian has brought up before that modern imagineers lack skill in the art of forced perspective effects that their predecessors once had (another example being the New Fantasyland facades, particularly for Be Our Guest). Something I have also noticed to be accurate.

As a result of all of this, even Frozen's best scenes look very flat and empty. Even the rooms that are supposed to have outdoor scenery. It does a consistently poor job at conveying a natural looking environment.

The only problem with Maelstrom is that it was criminally short. Only about 4 minutes. Absolute bare minimum it should have been double that, ideally at least triple though. Another flaw Frozen also didn't address...
 

WondersOfLife

Blink, blink. Breathe, breathe. Day in, day out.
Let’s not pretend he was trying to balance between IP and non-IP.
I wasn't saying that. But on a side note, he had PLENTY of IPs to use if he wanted to do so.
If he owned more IP, they would have been in there.
And I don't disagree.

But his creativity for new stories and characters in the parks would have continued to thrive.

Now, the last non-IP things we have gotten have been Space 220, Awesome Planet, and the O Canada reboot. Whoop Dee friggin doo.
 

wdwmagic

Administrator
Moderator
Premium Member
I am not defending the sing along, it's atrocious. What I am referring to is that kids are bored out of their mind watching Impressions, but are at least engaged with the sing along.
Well that's a problem for those kids and their parents. I see no issuewith kids actually learning something, and seeing another country on a large format projection. Disney should not be catering to the lowest common denominator.
 

Andrew25

Well-Known Member
Well that's a problem for those kids and their parents. I see no issuewith kids actually learning something, and seeing another country on a large format projection. Disney should not be catering to the lowest common denominator.

Not picking between either. I think both shows should rotate throughout the day. I am just mentioning what I observe.
 

Tony the Tigger

Well-Known Member
Well that's a problem for those kids and their parents. I see no issuewith kids actually learning something, and seeing another country on a large format projection. Disney should not be catering to the lowest common denominator.
I wouldn’t refer to children as the lowest common denominator because they’re age-appropriately bored with a boring travel pitch. (And I’ve referred to children as “dirty as pigeons.”)
My opinion is the sing-along should be on Disney+, not in a theme park.
Mine is Impressions should be on PBS, not in a theme park.

Running both seems to be the best solution for the moment!
 

UNCgolf

Well-Known Member
I wouldn’t refer to children as the lowest common denominator because they’re age-appropriately bored with a boring travel pitch. (And I’ve referred to children as “dirty as pigeons.”)

Not all children are bored with stuff like Impressions de France (it's certainly not a boring travel pitch).

I loved it as a kid, just like I loved basically all of EPCOT. It was a lot more fun than the Magic Kingdom (not that I disliked the Magic Kingdom).
 

JohnD

Well-Known Member
My opinion is the sing-along should be on Disney+, not in a theme park.
At least that one. I have to admit, I enjoy the Frozen sing along in HS. But that one has hilarious narrators so it's partly a live show. Except for Let It Go, they're out there grooving to the music also.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom