Actually yes all... Disney covers the overhead costs of the fund. That's one of the reasons why it's actually a really helpful organization, because everything donated actually goes towards helping the animals and not towards paying people, accounting, etc...
By Disney you means "guests." Disney will always find a way to charge guests for operating costs. And just about everyone knows when Disney uses the word "donation" that it's just a fancy word to make people think the price is justified.
True, but the overhead costs are not being deducted from the $30/person they're making from Caring for Giants, they're being covered by general profits they make from the parks, which kind of makes this conversation more interesting-- it's good that the $30 is going to the conservation fund, but in theory that means guests who will never do this experience are paying for its overhead costs. Although I guess it's not much different than increasing ticket prices and building an attraction some guests don't care to do.By Disney you means "guests." Disney will always find a way to charge guests for operating costs. And just about everyone knows when Disney uses the word "donation" that it's just a fancy word to make people think the price is justified.
Oh but they are. Disney doesn't donate employee and trainer time, vehicle upkeep and maintenance costs. That would mean they would eat the cost and cover it themselves. They don't. Those expenses are definitely handed down to guests.
They say all "proceeds" (I did the wild africa trek) which is not the same as the entire fee.
Didn't say they should stop. I think they should contribute more than 1 days gate at one park per year to this. Maybe the gate at ALL the parks on 4/22 each year?
Behind The Seeds price point has never really changed much and they're running tours all day long.
I think is a fair comparison. It's a hour long tour within an attraction guided by people specialized in their field that isn't food and beverage based.