Search results

A water parade type show would be great along the Discovery River but the noise levels might be a bit too much for the animals having it be park-wide like that. The little lake by Everest would be a nice spot though, it seems to be isolated enough. As for a story, it should be something that...

"Sugar Rush" I think is perfect for a Radiator Springs style racing ride. Can you imagine the ice cream peaks and cake valleys of this world rising over the old Indy speedway as another extension of new Fantasyland? The way you bring Ralph and company into it is simply set the ride in the middle...

it's not that nobody likes it, it's just no one cares. Avatar the franchise doesn't really inspire that much love from people. It'll open and it'll look nice but by that time, more people will be lining up for Cars Land 2.

Actually, it's the Matt Smith era that's made it so mainstream in the US. (Series 5 was when BBC-America took the rights from Sci-Fi and marketed it as their flagship show) It became such a success that the show now regularly goes to America to film an episode here and there (part of a...

I dunno, I still find the irony of it all to be highly entertaining. Both Disney and Cameron are all about drumming up excitement for Avatar, leaking blue prints, talk about all the different sequels and the general concensus is that no one cares. Heck, even the sequels, everyone's just glossing...

I highly disagree with you.

that's one attraction versus a whole land, plus Waterworld fits in in a park about movies.

I'm writing it off because it doesn't fit in fundamentally, not because the land itself sucks, which we don't know yet and I could really care less. I'm opposed to the placement not the land. You're being ed off, calling people irrational and immature for no reason.

Oh gee I'm sorry i'm not doing what you want me to, for heaven's sake why should I have the free will to not follow in other people's footsteps. And I've stated multiple times that my issue with this is not with the movie but with the fact that it's gonna be in Animal Kingdom. I could care...

yeah i saw it twice, i gave it a fair shot. I can definitively say that I didn't like it that doesn't mean I don't think it should be the focus of a theme park attraction. I've said numerous times that I would not mind it going to any of the other parks. and i've already explained numerous...

Aladdin fits because it's in the Arabian Coast, Raging Spirits fits because it;s in Lost River Delta, Tower of Terror fits because it's in American Waterfront, as does Toy Story Mania that will be located in a boardwalk type area, Journey to the Center of the Earth because its in Mysterious...

You're taking everything I say out of context, what's wrong with you? You're the one who was all talk about just enjoying individual well done attractions without worrying about the over-all theme, which is what's happening. And the same kind of thinking looks to be what's behind the design of...

oh I'm not boycotting Disney, I'm just sticking with Disneyland and Tokyo Disney Resort. And I've seen the movie thank you, I found it to be quite mediocre. Enjoy your Avatar-land. I'll go hang out at DisneySea instead.

yeah but that's also saying that the Avatar animals are really just animals and not part of a different planet, you're equating fictional animals that are completely made up with anthophomorphized cartoons taken from real animals. How on earth did you even connect those two?

a dictionary? really? you can do better than that. Or...well... maybe you can't.

yeah i'm sorry I'm not settling for just another big name movie property being shoe horned into a park it doesn't belong to. That's a real shame.

so it's NOT an a movie set in an alien world? Because they're all really just animals from our planet right?

so now you're saying that Avatar is not set on an alien planet?

alright that's just silly, those are fictional characters based on real animals.

I'm a Disney nerd, that's like asking for a silver lining to the holocaust.