• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

DAK 'Encanto' and 'Indiana Jones'-themed experiences at Animal Kingdom

HMF

Well-Known Member
The problem wasn’t just that it was too scary for young kids, but given that it was an indoor attraction with no height requirement featuring a popular children’s character, many parents assumed (yes, despite the signage) that it would be perfect for their little ones. That’s why its presence actually decreased overall guest ratings — the people who would hate it the most weren’t skipping it, they were particularly drawn to it.

ITTBAB suffered from a similar phenomenon, but at least there, if your kids were terrified, you could walk out in the middle, you weren’t strapped to the seat.
They made the exact same mistake with TBA in my opinion in completely not understanding what audience they were aiming for.
 

Cranky Kong

Member
I mean, I guess the name checks out. Sadly though, it doesn't really matter imo because Dinoland WAS built on the cheap. That was still the whole point.
Cheap doesn't inherently equal bad, just as expense doesn't necessarily equal good. It depends on how the resources are used. There are many examples of this I could point to, both in the theme park space and in other areas. I also don't think it's fair to suggest that Dinoland had no visible narrative while Africa does.

More to the point being argued earlier in the thread, I got the exact same feeling from Dinoland as I did Africa the first few times before I knew to actively look for environmental storytelling - that is, "oh, this is supposed to be an old village with a connection to nature that's become a site for tourists", in both cases, just for safaris in one case and dinosaurs in the other. Which is. . . ultimately. . . what every Animal Kingdom land is anyway, barring Camp Minnie-Mickey and arguably Oasis.

To be fair to those critical, do you think the impression comes from which direction Dinoland you mainly approached from? If most people discussing it came to it via Asia, then I agree the point of the theming was indeed less noticeable with Dinorama being the focal point, and if that's the first thing you see of the land, I can understand tuning the interesting things out, or missing things like the Diggs County sign when there's a giant green dinosaur the other side of the road. For example, that's how I feel about Toy Story Land, except unlike Dinoland there's zero avoiding it from either direction you approach it from. The giant character statues really sort of mess with me in a way that if I wasn't actively looking for them, I probably wouldn't notice things like the way certain plants were chosen to emulate grass or the fact the "tacky" pylons for Slinky are actually giant building toys; I did not get the impression of "oh I'm a toy" until I actively remembered that was the stated point. And this is a land that was built after the "immerse yourself in the movie" initiative started post-Potter.

Anyway, coming to Dinoland via Discovery Island, I really don't understand how one would find the Boneyard approach through to Restaurantasaurus and then Dinosaur "tacky" or "un/underthemed", at least pre-Dino Bash anyway. As someone who has no interest in Everest, I almost never approached Dinoland via Asia, so maybe I've been uncharitable to those who did mostly navigate to it after rushing to Everest first thing, when I fully understand with Toy Story Land in mind.

As an aside, boy oh boy I have a lot of chagrin for Dino-Bash. I thought it was a fun, lovely idea the first year they had it up. Then the second year. Then I realized they were never going to take it down. 100% did not help things. Worst part, they never even had a suit character of the new dinosaur OC they made for it! To say nothing of the old Restaurantosaurus loop appearing to be lost to time...
 

JD80

Well-Known Member
It would be nice if people stopped using the word "cheap" since it has more than one meaning.

Alternatively, use either "low quality," "poorly made," "inexpensive," or "poorly funded."

I have to tell this to young people coming in to business all the time. Use words like "inexpensive" or "lower budget" or "entry level".
 

lentesta

Premium Member
Hey @lentesta didn't that Maya convention thing happen? Any chance they spoke about Indy again?

Yep. Three days of really good stuff. It's just fun to see talented people doing things well.

WDI made a point of saying everything in their presentation was confidential and not to share it. And I have to honor that.

For last year's stuff I explicitly asked before they started talking, and they said both legal & comms had approved. So last year it was okay, but not this year.

I will say, like I did last year, that I'm super, super impressed with the dedication WDI has to honoring the culture and stories of the Maya. They're a great team doing good stuff. Really excited for y'all to see it.
 

ChewbaccaYourMum

Well-Known Member
Yep. Three days of really good stuff. It's just fun to see talented people doing things well.

WDI made a point of saying everything in their presentation was confidential and not to share it. And I have to honor that.

For last year's stuff I explicitly asked before they started talking, and they said both legal & comms had approved. So last year it was okay, but not this year.

I will say, like I did last year, that I'm super, super impressed with the dedication WDI has to honoring the culture and stories of the Maya. They're a great team doing good stuff. Really excited for y'all to see it.
That's awesome and completely understand! Thank you for letting us know, and I'm happy you had a great time again!

With that being said, are you allowed to say if it made you more excited and confident in the Indy attraction? If I remember correctly, last years presentation got you a lot more excited and confident that they knew what they were doing with this new Indy attraction.
If you don't think you can answer, that's fine!
 
Last edited:

lentesta

Premium Member
That's awesome and completely understand! Thank you for letting us know, and I'm happy you had a great time again!

With that being said, are you allowed to say if it made you more excited and confident in the Indy attraction? If I remember correctly, last years presentation got you a lot more excited and confident that they knew what they were doing with this new Indy attraction.
If you don't think you can answer, that's fine!

Oh yeah, 100% excited for all of it. They’re putting in the hours and talking to the right people.
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
Hi Disney Spies!! Please release more of this info officially! If len could hear about it, why can't we? Thank you spies
1771877128696.png
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom