I mean, I guess the name checks out. Sadly though, it doesn't really matter imo because Dinoland WAS built on the cheap. That was still the whole point.
Cheap doesn't inherently equal bad, just as expense doesn't necessarily equal good. It depends on how the resources are used. There are many examples of this I could point to, both in the theme park space and in other areas. I also don't think it's fair to suggest that Dinoland had no visible narrative while Africa does.
More to the point being argued earlier in the thread, I got the exact same feeling from Dinoland as I did Africa the first few times before I knew to actively look for environmental storytelling - that is, "oh, this is supposed to be an old village with a connection to nature that's become a site for tourists", in both cases, just for safaris in one case and dinosaurs in the other. Which is. . . ultimately. . . what every Animal Kingdom land is anyway, barring Camp Minnie-Mickey and arguably Oasis.
To be fair to those critical, do you think the impression comes from which direction Dinoland you mainly approached from? If most people discussing it came to it via Asia, then I agree the point of the theming was indeed less noticeable with Dinorama being the focal point, and if that's the first thing you see of the land, I can understand tuning the interesting things out, or missing things like the Diggs County sign when there's a giant green dinosaur the other side of the road. For example, that's how I feel about Toy Story Land, except unlike Dinoland
there's zero avoiding it from either direction you approach it from. The giant character statues really sort of mess with me in a way that if I wasn't actively looking for them, I probably wouldn't notice things like the way certain plants were chosen to emulate grass or the fact the "tacky" pylons for Slinky are actually giant building toys; I did not get the impression of "oh I'm a toy" until I actively remembered that was the stated point. And this is a land that was built after the "immerse yourself in the movie" initiative started post-Potter.
Anyway, coming to Dinoland via Discovery Island, I really don't understand how one would find the Boneyard approach through to Restaurantasaurus and then Dinosaur "tacky" or "un/underthemed", at least pre-Dino Bash anyway. As someone who has no interest in Everest, I almost never approached Dinoland via Asia, so maybe I've been uncharitable to those who did mostly navigate to it after rushing to Everest first thing, when I fully understand with Toy Story Land in mind.
As an aside, boy oh boy I have a lot of chagrin for Dino-Bash. I thought it was a fun, lovely idea the first year they had it up. Then the second year. Then I realized they were
never going to take it down. 100% did not help things. Worst part, they never even had a suit character of the new dinosaur OC they made for it! To say nothing of the old Restaurantosaurus loop appearing to be lost to time...