Yeah, I don't understand why there is the re-narrative that Dinosaur was somehow popular or not "underutilized" space as a ride.
It was clearly not a successful ride in terms of rider interest. It's low wait times were not a solely a reflection of high capacity. When you run the ratio of average wait time by operating hourly capacity, thereby controlling for the different hourly capacities of each ride, rides like Space Mountain, Pirates, Big Thunder, Rise of the Resistance, Everest, Avatar Flight of Passage, tower of terror, Guardians all show significantly greater rider interest than Dinosaur. And just commonsense tells you that: How many people has anyone spoken to after a Disney trip who excitedly said "I went on this amazing ride - Dinosaur (or Countdown) - at Disney! You've got to ride it!" I have heard that when Everest opened. And Avatar. And tower of Terror. And Rise. Even Tron. I've never -- not once -- heard that about Dinosaur. Very few people get off that ride and immediately felt a need to get back in line -- even with 10 minute waits. Whereas you see guests recycling back on Everest repeatedly in low-line situation.
It's low wait times simply reflect it just wasn't a very good ride. It was the Mission: Space of Animal Kingdom.
This was an easy and correct call here: the Indiana Jones versions of this ride system are far superior to Dinosaur, which was of marginal interest to most guests throughout its existence.