Mr. Sullivan
Well-Known Member
It was not about Iger's ego not allowing him to see issues with the sequels, it was about Iger forgetting that the Star Wars fanbase is notoriously impossible to please and full of some deeply, deeply rotten people (and I say this as a member of said fanbase) and that even if the sequels were the best films ever made in the history of cinema, there'd be a line out the door of people with lists of reasons they hated them as long as my forearm.I have loved Star Wars since I was nine years old and I acknowledge it's a bad fit and honestly has outlived its welcome. I feel the same way about the two American incarnations of Star Tours especially with the advent of Galaxy's Edge in completely different areas of their respective parks. I would have set the land in the timeline of the original trilogy but Iger's ego was too strong to fathom that the Sequel Trilogy was going to implode.
It was perfectly reasonable to design the land with the sequels in mind, especially when the reception to the first of them was massive enthusiasm. Very few could've predicted what was going to happen culturally around those movies. By the time people started acting stupid, it was way too late for them to change course on that.
You really, really cannot blame everything you don't like on Bob Iger and/or his ego. Issues run much deeper than Iger as a lone figure, and in some cases you're drawing a connection to Iger that just isn't even really even there.
Let's critique Bob Iger for real, tangible reasons (there is no shortage of proven things to call him on) instead of the fan fiction you write about him.