• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

News Disney’s Fiscal Full Year and Q4 2025 Earnings Results Webcast

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
Here's the assumptions I'm working with:
  • 2024 domestic attendance of 76.489MM from the TEA report
  • Q1 and Q4 are higher attendance according to Disney's 10-Q reports, so weigh them as contributing 30% each towards attendance. Weight Q2 and Q3 at 20% each.
  • We know the Q1, Q2, and Q3 attendance changes from those 10-Qs, too.
    • There's probably some rounding in there, but we don't know
So then the question is "How much did attendance change in Q4 to get to -1% overall?"

And yeah, it works out to be around -4% in one quarter:

View attachment 892817

I could be wrong but that seems ballpark-y. I haven't tried different weights for the quarterly variations in attendance.

It is probably also a rounded -1% figure, would also be my presumption. Meaning it could be closer to -2/-3.

Q4 fully is in Epic’s shadow either way.
 

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
I understand that plenty of people do consider cruises as a viable alternative to a theme park, but I will never understand why. They aren't even remotely similar things to me.

Like, yes, it's an alternative vacation you could take, just like going to Europe is an alternative. But, at least to me, it's like suggesting someone that wants to go skiing could just go to the beach instead.

They are overlapping more than you’d think. If a Disney park experience is summarized as lapping Tron then no, it’s not an equivocal experience at all. But if one is looking at resorts, characters, entertainment, service within the wrapping of a Disney bubble, a lot of people are finding it a natural substitute. It scratches the same itch, one that is for better or worse a branding itch.

Ostensibly you have cruise operators like RCL that are increasingly turning into a water park land operators. There seems to be an endpoint that Disney has a Typhoon lagoon equivalent in the Bahamas.
 

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
The hyperventilation over the last 12 hours did not fail to disappoint me.

Revenue and operating income at experiences remains significantly up since 2019 and even more since 2015. Disney survived an economic catastrophe they’ve never seen before that required the shuttering then severe disruption of their experiences portfolio for years. They survived a coordinated political attack, a malicious corporate takeover, an even worse CEO. They survived the complete undoing of their primary income source(s). Including their own self destruction of theatrical.

The company is neither currently in an exciting place. Nor is experiences their struggling buisness unit. Nothing remotely exciting was in this report. The company is fortuitously in a boring phase.
 

Tha Realest

Well-Known Member
All is good right now because the top 10% have been riding out one if, if not the longest duration, bull markets in history and one that has produced ~235% returns over the past decade, while also seeing one of their larger assets, their houses, essentially double in value.

Good point. Here is what a $1,000 investment in DIS would be worth today:

1763084115336.png



 

PREMiERdrum

Well-Known Member
Addressing part of @PREMiERdrum post from earlier…

Expansion of the luggage services is a sign that they know they need the buses back. But Bob never “loses”…so he needs a recession of some type to spend the money…A “don’t blame me” to his investors

I think he wants that for a few things

I'm not sure we'll ever see a legacy DME-like system again, but value-adds like the baggage handling test could go along way.

And, DisneyNittany, I get it. Shameful that enforcement expected guidelines to be followed. 🍻
 

JoeCamel

Well-Known Member

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Especially if you account for inflation, you lost money. Of course all but a handful of stocks on earth would have similar, or worse outcomes.
Wow…I just Remember when Eisner was EVIL…20 years of investment…those stock splits…

Just awful

Studios Paris did suck though…put the idiot under him who was a throw in when he bought espn in charge!!!😡
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Now try going 20 years back and compare them with their competitors.
So is that
“Somedays you get the bear and somedays the bear gets you?” Logic?

I’d even agree with it…if the product was still the same quality

…ummm…no

If you bought those shares…more like 25 years ago during the dot.com crash, digital media switch and 2002 recession…you made some nice scratch…

Like enough to pay for one of your rental houses 😬

But if you bought it 10 years ago…during the “biggest boom in the world ever!!!” You haven’t made enough to buy a donut
 

UNCgolf

Well-Known Member
They are overlapping more than you’d think. If a Disney park experience is summarized as lapping Tron then no, it’s not an equivocal experience at all. But if one is looking at resorts, characters, entertainment, service within the wrapping of a Disney bubble, a lot of people are finding it a natural substitute. It scratches the same itch, one that is for better or worse a branding itch.

Ostensibly you have cruise operators like RCL that are increasingly turning into a water park land operators. There seems to be an endpoint that Disney has a Typhoon lagoon equivalent in the Bahamas.

No no, I know they are -- I'm just saying that it personally would not work at all for me. I like theme parks (although I don't go very often) and I strongly dislike cruises. A cruise is just about the last thing I'd ever do for a vacation; I'd need someone to pay me to take one.

I suppose it makes more sense to me if the goal is just to be immersed in "Disney", but Disney IP was never the reason I enjoyed Disney theme parks (not that I don't also enjoy Disney IP, but original EPCOT was why I fell in love with WDW), so a cruise ship filled with Disney IP doesn't sound any more appealing to me than one without Disney IP.
 

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
No no, I know they are -- I'm just saying that it personally would not work at all for me. I like theme parks (although I don't go very often) and I strongly dislike cruises.

Exactly. I think you don’t value any of the areas that overlap, which is obviously fine.

I will say that service, food and entertainment exceed Disney’s land experience. Though as far as DCL is concerned I find they are very overpriced.

A cruise is just about the last thing I'd ever do for a vacation; I'd need someone to pay me to take one.

I’m curious what sort of past experience you have with them? You might be surprised. There’s a wide space between a Carnival to Nassau, a bike and barge in Europe or an expedition vessel to Antarctica. It’s a pretty broad industry. There’s usually a brand, size, experience and type for most people.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom