Sirwalterraleigh
Premium Member
It’s terrible…well below the markets and also what’s needed to weather the mounting economic pressures
It’s terrible…well below the markets and also what’s needed to weather the mounting economic pressures
The talk I hear now is how expensive a Disney vacation is.
That is not a favorable shift in customer perception.
My simple brain just tells me if they are offering as many discounts as they are, they are below target on the number of bodies they want in the parks. And I'm also sure they want more money per person. I mean who doesn't?
Disney stated that the record volumes of attendance were hurting their business too. You can't keep cramming more people into the parks and expect people to be OK with that.
So between the two, what hurts more, overcrowding or high prices?
I think the answer to this can really be found in who these discounts are targeting and how Disney actually benefits from them.What confuses me is if Disney wants Less people who spend more, why all of the discounts lately?
Both are due to bad managementDisney stated that the record volumes of attendance were hurting their business too. You can't keep cramming more people into the parks and expect people to be OK with that.
So between the two, what hurts more, overcrowding or high prices?
What hurts more is the brand damage of being perceived as a rip off.Disney stated that the record volumes of attendance were hurting their business too. You can't keep cramming more people into the parks and expect people to be OK with that.
So between the two, what hurts more, overcrowding or high prices?
What if the word gets out that the unpaid vloggers and podders (who lurk here) are full of crap and pushing a “demand” narrative at corporate behest and just are too Dumb to realize it?plus their profit is highly dependent on LL. Sure you can cut capacity but eventually you lose enough guests the lines will still be short. Thats when people stop buying LL, and then you’re up poop creek without a paddle.
Compare the trailing 52 weeks for those companies to Disney.NVIDIA is down 4%, Tesla is down 7%, Intel is down 6%, Palantir is down 7%
Wall Street is Wall Street.
No, streaming being king and AI being a buzz word.Which fad?
Lighting lane?
Besides a brief dip in 2022, coinciding with Fed rate hikes, we've been on an unprecedented run. That immediately recovered.Did you land on Earth in 2022?
| Year | Return |
|---|---|
| 2009 | 26.46% |
| 2010 | 15.06% |
| 2011 | 2.11% |
| 2012 | 16.00% |
| 2013 | 32.39% |
| 2014 | 13.69% |
| 2015 | 1.38% |
| 2016 | 11.96% |
| 2017 | 21.83% |
| 2018 | –4.38% |
| 2019 | 31.49% |
| 2020 | 18.40% |
| 2021 | 28.71% |
| 2022 | –18.11% |
| 2023 | 26.29% |
| 2024 | 25.02% |
Agreed, Disney is not just a theme park company. And I think the comparison to Kodak is not only not an "incredible bad comparison" but in fact quite apropos precisely considering the technological disruption to, and consumer behavior changes around, linear television, and arguably theatrical films. Kodak is kind of a case study in fact. Yes, Disney has attempted to "change with the times" with Disney+/Hulu but just because they're trying doesn't mean it will be successful.KODAK also had the opportunity to change with the times with digital technology and chose not to invest in it. It's an incredible bad comparison. Disney is also just not a theme park company either.
No, not sure your point. But last time we were in So. Cal. I took the family to Universal instead of Disney because I find Disney's ticketing and Lightning Lane B.S. off-putting. And the lame Madame Leota gift shop also made me think Disney wasn't even trying anymore. So, little things can affect attendance.And they would change their mind if MagicalExpress came back? Or the rooms were 10% off? Probably not.
I wouldn’t say “fads” per se…No, streaming being king and AI being a buzz word.
Other than the simple reality that many major companies are experiencing a decline in stock prices today, Disney is currently beholden to the same volitility that the rest of the entertainment sphere is in that streaming and AI integration are current obsessions of analysts and any company who isn’t maneuvering the way these analysts think they should get punished.
Like yoy very correctly said earlier in this thread, the stock market has made itself pretty meaningless because of how reactive it is to things that in the long-term aren’t going to matter.
Streaming is already circling the drain a bit and I don’t foresee that changing in a positive direction anytime soon if ever. Disney’s streaming is doing better than some of their nearest competitors such as Paramount and Universal, but they along with WBD and Netflix are operating inside of a bubble that is going to implode (Netflix coming to the table to start working with AMC is a telltale sign of this). That’s why you see some of the big players exploring these bundles. They are just as aware that streaming is not going to remain king forever, especially as the non-Netflix streamers are becoming more and more aware of how streaming hurts their theatrical business.
Wall Street, however, is still pretty obsessed with streaming. While it has always been the case, it has been exceptionally clear I think in the last decade that Wall Street is very slow to react to change. They are not reacting to the noticeable wavering of streaming’s durability and are still holding entertainment companies by the throat to continue growing that segment even though it has a clear point of destruction.
in the same thing is happening with AI. Even though Iger brought it up, generally speaking, Disney is not going as deep on AI as analysts seem to want them to.
It has been a view Wall Street for years and years now, even when Disney was experiencing an exceptional run of success pre-pandemic, that Disney is an antiquated legacy company that has gone past the point of innovation and is going to pretty much hover where it currently sits forever. Them not going all in on AI confirms that in analyst’s minds. The thing is though AI is a bubble just like the dot com stuff was, and it is going to burst sooner rather than later, and it’s going to be really ugly when it does because Wall Street has gone so all in on it and tech companies in particular are chasing the dragon with them.
But once again, Wall Street seems to be in blissful ignorance of this and are giving unfavorable evaluations to companies that are not hopping on this bandwagon to an insane degree.
That is not to say that everything Disney is doing is perfect. It’s not. You may be shocked to hear me say this, but yes, I can identify problems with how the company is performing and how it’s being run. However, I do not think that the stock price is what people should be looking at to have that conversation, and you seem to somewhat agree with that. The stock price is influenced by people and things that have very little to do with how Disney as a company is actually operating and as such Disney would be wise to not knee-jerk react to it.
The comment I was referring to was saying they don’t know what Disney is going to do because Wall Street wants them out of the movie business. I’m saying they’re not gonna do anything, or at least they shouldn’t do anything, just because Wall Street has taken a stance that’s not really based on reality. I’m not saying that Disney should completely ignore the stock market, but I am saying that they should not take advice from the stock market because currently Wall Street is basing their perspective of everything on a whole bunch of stuff that is going to be meaningless five years from now.
Addressing part of @PREMiERdrum post from earlier…
Expansion of the luggage services is a sign that they know they need the buses back. But Bob never “loses”…so he needs a recession of some type to spend the money…A “don’t blame me” to his investors
I think he wants that for a few things
plus their profit is highly dependent on LL.
What hurts more is the brand damage of being perceived as a rip off.
As far as cramming more people into overcrowded parks last time I checked Disney can limit the capacity to their parks.
No, not sure your point. But last time we were in So. Cal. I took the family to Universal instead of Disney because I find Disney's ticketing and Lightning Lane B.S. off-putting.
Did you read the rest of my post? I said people will stop buying LL if lines are short (due to decreased attendance) which if they continue to lose customers will happen eventually. I said nothing about online booking/upcharge system.lol wut?
You are worried that, people already paying extra for a better experience with lightning lane, will be less inclined to spend more money when the online booking and upcharge system is removed?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.