• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

DAK “Zootopia” is being created for the Tree of Life theater

bmr1591

Well-Known Member
That is...If CBS/Viacom just gives them the middle finger of fate...Then you should worry.

From what I heard, Imagineers pretty much told execs they can't mess with ToT and that they refuse to work on anything that has to do with a retheme of it. How true that is, I don't know, but I hope it is.


Honestly, I don't think an IP mandate is bad. People come to Disney World to see the Disney characters they love. The problem we've had is the terrible product that has come out, which to me speaks more about the quality of imagineers than Bob Iger's desire to make use of his IP. Take TBA. Yes, it's difficult to come up with a solid strategy to retheme Splash into a Tiana ride, but there are plenty of directions you could take it that would be more compelling and create an overall better attraction than what we got. Bob didn't sit in a meeting and ask for the secret ingredient to be music. That's the imagineers.
 

celluloid

Well-Known Member
I’m not sure how this directly relates to Iger or how him leaving would potentially change this for the better. The IP mandate is only a fractional part of the issue. His exit could signal the end of the IP fixation (though I very much doubt it), but it won’t magically unlock more impressive attractions or better storytelling capabilities within Imagineering.

Who said anything about IP and who said only Iger? It's a culture problem he co-created.
 
Last edited:

celluloid

Well-Known Member
Problem is, people are idiots and continue to give Disney their money and flock to whatever crappy new attractions they open. And Iger continues to get away with things that Eisner was, and would be, taken to task for.
That is catching up the way their too big to fail box office reputation did...fast.
 

Brer Panther

Well-Known Member
From what I heard, Imagineers pretty much told execs they can't mess with ToT and that they refuse to work on anything that has to do with a retheme of it.
Hmmm. I wonder if that's the ONLY attraction they refuse to mess with or if there are others.

If there's any truth to that, good on them.
Honestly, I don't think an IP mandate is bad. People come to Disney World to see the Disney characters they love.
Doing IP-based attractions isn't bad, the problem is just that there used to be a balance of IP-based rides and original attractions - it shouldn't have to be ONLY IP rides or ONLY original rides. Also, they have a habit of putting certain IPs in places that they do not belong.
 

TrainsOfDisney

Well-Known Member
Because a random 3D show is indicative of all quality but not Test track, Guardians, Rise of resistance
Guardians has a crazy amount of flaws for the price tag but it’s actually a really fun ride.

The exact same coaster without the IP would have the same lines. If you want proof look at tron…. Cause nobody cared about that Ip! Lol
 

Casper Gutman

Well-Known Member
Because a random 3D show is indicative of all quality but not Test track, Guardians, Rise of resistance
The new Test Track is very weak - the positive reaction is baffling. GotG is a fun coaster and a really lousy theme park ride and a weak representation of the IP. Zootopia isn’t an aberration, it’s the continuation of a trend.

Just to keep this from being too negative - up until Big Al appears, the new Country Bears is a lot better than I expected. I liked it more than the old Vacation show. It’s not flawless, but if it were alternating with instead of replacing the old show I’d almost love it -well, 2/3rds of it.
 

HMF

Well-Known Member
Does anyone think Bruce “cool sh**” is a good thing for WDI? Are you just hoping that he had nothing to do with this so cars of the frontier isn’t a disaster?
He is better than whoever ran WDI under Chapek but that is like scraping the bottle of the barrel.
 

HMF

Well-Known Member
I’m not sure how this directly relates to Iger or how him leaving would potentially change this for the better. The IP mandate is only a fractional part of the issue. His exit could signal the end of the IP fixation (though I very much doubt it), but it won’t magically unlock more impressive attractions or better storytelling capabilities within WDI.
If you hired enough actually creative people you could.
 

Cmdr_Crimson

Well-Known Member
Eisner was the person who extended the idea of IP attractions outside Fantasyland but unlike Iger, Eisner actually was open to original ideas whereas Iger has enshrined in policy that completely original ideas are forbidden.
Case in point....The failed original movie ride that was planned for Epcot Adjacent to JII.
images
 

FettFan

Well-Known Member
View attachment 890816

This doesn't sit right with me. Animals DON'T coexist like in Zootopia. They are ruled by the forces of nature, which another poster states "we evolved beyond." This is an extremely problematic statement to make in a park dedicated to showcasing the forces of nature.

Even worse is that they’re making the ToL sculptures part of the Zootopia canon. 🤢 🤮

Instead of a magic Tree of Life that grew with animal portraits occurring within it, it’s now Zootopia encroaching on (vandalizing) the natural world just like humans.

It’s an egregious waste, like carving faces into the side of a mountain .
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom