Of course they could reappropriate the theater space in the future. But would they? This is the same company that's had a theater sitting empty for literally 99% of a park's existence, and you want to put that much faith in them to not allow it to happen again?
Would I dedicate an entire land to this IP? I think a general Oz theme would play better to an American audience than a Japanese one, and would be immediately recognizable to most people at the very least, but I'm not convinced it would be much of an actual pull for most. Even if they made a great attraction, it would likely end up like Monsters, with one of the shortest waits in the park. However, this would be even more true for Wicked, whether they try to expand the franchise or not. It's niche. So the way I see it, you either do an entire Oz land, which at least bears a resemblance to the version everyone knows, or you don't bother. Either way, we don't need a theater that used to play Wicked sitting off on a thematic desert island somewhere.
Good god is the theming unreal just everywhere you go.
Adding to that, I think it would be a little bit of a missed opportunity if universal were to do a land specifically based on the Wicked movies. There's so much you could do with the Oz world that if they were to put wicked in the parks I think they should do an Oz themed land with attractions from Wicked and the original Wizard of Oz. Plus, since Oz is known by multiple generations, people would be familiar with the world even if they haven't seen the wicked movies. But maybe you could make that argument for a Wicked land anyway since its already in Oz?If a Wicked land was made at any Universal park nowadays, it would be based on the film franchise rather than the musical.
I don't know why you're so flustered by differing opinions on the park, but you really think only two rides in Epic are on Disney's level of "technical prowess?" As if every ride at Disney is a cutting edge E-ticket?Getting a little tired of someone every now and then attempting to re-energize the narrative that "Epic Universe is the most beautiful, most creative, and most immersive theme park EvEr MaDe". It objectively is not, and everyone who isn't a terminally online theme park nerd that has made "prefers Universal over Disney" their identity has come to terms with this. Note that none of us are saying its bad, but it is not constructive to apply such blind praise to a park that is imperfect in many ways and could be improved over the years if they take actual constructive criticism to heart.
Only two of the park's five lands match the thematic immersion level set by the likes of Diagon Alley, Galaxy's Edge, Pandora, and a few others. The rest of the lands are full of views of backstage, dumpsters, outside of the park, the water treatment plant, expansion plots, etc.
Only two rides in the park give Disney a run for their money on their level of technical prowess (Monsters and Ministry), and word on the street is that Universal is already severely lacking in the upkeep of the show quality (not that Disney wouldn't also do this...)
The park as a whole is nowhere near as immersive as even Animal Kingdom down the road. Epic does not "DeSTrOy DiSnEy".
don't disrespect the magic carpets of Aladdin like thatI don't know why you're so flustered by differing opinions on the park, but you really think only two rides in Epic are on Disney's level of "technical prowess?" As if every ride at Disney is a cutting edge E-ticket?
You overrated Galaxy's edge. Making a land time sensitive can be a big mistake for a theme park land, and it was in this case. The fact is Galaxy's Edge takes place in sequels time land and that means no classic Characters for Galaxy's Edge. People want classic Star Wars Characters That also meant gave an excuse why Star Wars Launch Bay existed so long at Animation Courtyard.Only two of the park's five lands match the thematic immersion level set by the likes of Diagon Alley, Galaxy's Edge, Pandora, and a few others. The rest of the lands are full of views of backstage, dumpsters, outside of the park, the water treatment plant, expansion plots, etc.
I mean uh... isn't Isle of Berk also incredibly time sensitive. I think Galaxy's Edge is more impressive than trying to make Tatooine or something as well.You overrated Galaxy's edge. Making a land time sensitive can be a big mistake for a theme park land, and it was in this case. The fact is Galaxy's Edge takes place in sequels time land and that means no classic Characters for Galaxy's Edge. People want classic Star Wars Characters That also meant gave an excuse why Star Wars Launch Bay existed so long at Animation Courtyard.
Also a lot of people wanted Galaxy's edge to have a planet that already existed in the movies and Disney didn't do that. That is an issue to a lot of people because the Harry Potter theme park lands are based off lands that existed in Harry Potter Movies.
I might be a nitpicking but I would not consider seeing cars driving past within 5 seconds on their highly themed "Viking Village" coaster as a "finer thing" nor taking US themeparking to a new level.Too many don’t appreciate the finer things in life.
As for theme parks Epic’s overall visuals destroy anything created outside of Disney Sea. The queues, AA’s, fronts/facades, portals take US themeparking to a new level.
Food be mighty fine, too……not like that garbage found at Universal Studios and to some extent IOA.
lol. Why you mad?Getting a little tired of someone every now and then attempting to re-energize the narrative that "Epic Universe is the most beautiful, most creative, and most immersive theme park EvEr MaDe". It objectively is not, and everyone who isn't a terminally online theme park nerd that has made "prefers Universal over Disney" their identity has come to terms with this. Note that none of us are saying its bad, but it is not constructive to apply such blind praise to a park that is imperfect in many ways and could be improved over the years if they take actual constructive criticism to heart.
Only two of the park's five lands match the thematic immersion level set by the likes of Diagon Alley, Galaxy's Edge, Pandora, and a few others. The rest of the lands are full of views of backstage, dumpsters, outside of the park, the water treatment plant, expansion plots, etc.
Only two rides in the park give Disney a run for their money on their level of technical prowess (Monsters and Ministry), and word on the street is that Universal is already severely lacking in the upkeep of the show quality (not that Disney wouldn't also do this...)
The park as a whole is nowhere near as immersive as even Animal Kingdom down the road. Epic does not "DeSTrOy DiSnEy".
I mean just seems like they're a big fan of something and tired of seeing it be crapped on by people for some pretty shallow/stupid reasonslol. Why you mad?
Agreed. Zero energy in galaxy’s edge. Not to mention they cut the crap out of it from the get go.You overrated Galaxy's edge. Making a land time sensitive can be a big mistake for a theme park land, and it was in this case. The fact is Galaxy's Edge takes place in sequels time land and that means no classic Characters for Galaxy's Edge. People want classic Star Wars Characters That also meant gave an excuse why Star Wars Launch Bay existed so long at Animation Courtyard.
Also a lot of people wanted Galaxy's edge to have a planet that already existed in the movies and Disney didn't do that. That is an issue to a lot of people because the Harry Potter theme park lands are based off lands that existed in Harry Potter Movies.
Such is life.I mean just seems like they're a big fan of something and tired of seeing it be crapped on by people for some pretty shallow/stupid reasons
How many times you going to repeat this influencer park nonsense? What universal has done post Covid gets people excited. What Disney has done is a joke. And some Disney fans now see more value in going to universal than Disney (me included). Deal with it. Or don’t.If Epic Universe is the new level, I hope we go tf back. The park was built to look very nice in simple instagram shots and off rides where you can't film. Very grand. But it fails at being a great amusement park with its horrid capacity issues, obvious lack of theming on certain rides (Monsters + Isle of Berk have this problem the most), and severe lack of shade. It's like every single land is made to be shot on vlogs/pretty for pictures but it starts losing that substance for me very quickly when you're actually in the park.
I haven't been there, so take my opinions with as much of a grain of salt as you please, but my impression is that in terms of attractions Epic has a lot going for it. I think where some dissonance arrises for people who are primarily fans of Disney parks is when rollercoasters that pay a lot less attention to immersion within the park let alone a specific land are counted as headliners when if Disney built similar attractions we would all be up in arms.I don't know why you're so flustered by differing opinions on the park, but you really think only two rides in Epic are on Disney's level of "technical prowess?" As if every ride at Disney is a cutting edge E-ticket?
I can confirm this. No pre-show on our visit last Thursday and Friday. Also, Igor not working, Wolfman not working, Dracula at the end not working. Overall very disappointed with the ride.Getting reports of LOTS of effects broken on most of the rides. Monsters, for instance, running with no pre-show and half the animatronics frozen.
There is one thing I firmly believe Universal has been doing better than Disney since Potter, and that is keeping the effects on their attractions working. So to hear reports of lots of effects broken on almost every ride at Epic is... concerning.
I've said it like twice? maybe this is the third time maximum. Also what Disney has done definitely gets people excited as guest satisfaction has shown. Universal has done some great things but they lack the foresight imo to be a serious contender.How many times you going to repeat this influencer park nonsense? What universal has done post Covid gets people excited. What Disney has done is a joke. And some Disney fans now see more value in going to universal than Disney (me included). Deal with it. Or don’t.
These are very unfortunate for a park so new to have, especially for a land that has been cloned twice already.I can confirm this. No pre-show on our visit last Thursday and Friday. Also, Igor not working, Wolfman not working, Dracula at the end not working. Overall very disappointed with the ride.
Harry Potter had several effects not working. Umbridge's AA didn't disappear like it's supposed to, so she was on screen and still visible as an AA at the same time. And most of the trial scene did not light up like it's apparently supposed to from the POVs I've watched since returning home.
Hiccup is completely stationary on the coaster.
Several figures not working on Yoshi's Adventure. Several broken figures throughout Super Nintendo World, including the Koopa at the mini-game and the Goomba at that mini-game. The piranha plant mini game is completely broken. Yoshi was not walking around the tree on Mt. Beanpole and the tower of goombas was not moving.
Cranky's mouth is broken in the queue to Mine Cart Madness. The car did not have on-board audio.
The park's restrooms and outdoor seating areas were filthy. I don't think I ever saw a single custodian the entire trip.
The operations were as slow as a Six Flags park. It should not take 40 minutes to reach the load area of Mario Kart after exiting the pre-show. I will not be returning.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.