Universal Epic Universe (South Expansion Complex) - Now Open!

[Comped]

While I agree entertainment has never been Uni strong suit they definitely have the talent to pull off shows just as good as Disney.

Did you forget Creative and Imagineering basically share employees ?

I'm well aware they share employees. Disney has a significantly stronger history and culture, and infrastructure, surrounding live entertainment. Could they? Untrainable proved they could certainly make an attempt (more focused on tech than anything else), but I'd need more proof this is a long term commitment.

 

[celluloid]

To me, this attitude has been the most puzzling thing about watching Epic Universe's opening unfold: a defensiveness when it comes to any suggestion that anything could have been handled better. That seems to extend, in this case, to it being hilarious to suggest Universal could benefit from studying how Disney has built up such brand loyalty and emotional attachment to their parks. I would have thought any company would be envious of that regardless of your opinion of current Disney management, but ok

I do wonder whether this is why some are complaining of all the negativity on here toward Epic Universe despite the fact the park has mostly received very positive reviews. If all critiques are met with a firm "no", it unnecessarily polarises the discussion as there is no middle ground and relatively minor critiques become major disagreements.


Sorry if you were confused, but I was discussing the impact of the opening night extravaganza beginning undercut by the decision to begin with a recorded corporate speech. You may have seen someone else posted the Shanghai Disneyland equivalent earlier for reference.

It was humoring because you critique something a company would do differently when they did just that. The same kind of corporate open every new major theme park does mixed with razzle dazzle. You are basically critiquing the ribbon cutting moment the night before for doing a firework and drone show. So really. More than typical. It was very appropriate for Woodbury and Spielberg because of their direct creative influence over Universal parks and destinations since early on. Yes, Josh D would be different because the guy did not come from the creative production or design side. Because it is different, you want to get on the trope of why they don't do it like Disney. Then you post as if they do something different, they must inherently need to learn. False dichotomy.
You also discount the entire near week of opening bits the park had. You are only going by the firework nighttime situation you did not like. Not the opening moment the next day, nor all of the Portal vignettes they did.

Yes, that extravaganza posted was what followed after Bob Iger corporate speaking. It's the same on different scale.
Shanghai was Disney opening a park in a market that has never had an American company open one.
Epic is third actual theme park to open in the Uni Orlando resort catalogue.

We don't know what Disney would do for sure for a new park stateside because we have not had a new Disney Park stateside in over about quarter century. Media is different in many ways now than it was about 25 years ago.
But we do know how they treat celebrations and attraction expansions, and it is not all that different.

See WDW 50th.
(And don't do the pandemic excuse. Other parks did more with it)

 

[Sir_Cliff]

It was humoring because you critique something a company would do differently when they did just that. The same kind of corporate open every new major theme park does mixed with razzle dazzle. You are basically critiquing the ribbon cutting moment the night before for doi g a firework and drone show. So really. More than typical. It was very appropriate for Woodbury and Spielberg because of their direct creative influence over Universal parks and destinations since early on. Yes, Josh D would be different because the guy did not come from the creative production or design side. Because it is different, you want to get on the trope of why don't they do it like Disney. Then you post as if they do something different they must inherently need to learn. False dichotomy.
You also discount the entire near week of opening bits the park had. You are only going by the firework night time situation you did not like. Not the opening moment the next day, nor all of the Portal vignettes they did.

Yes, that extravaganza posted was what followed sfterBob Iger corporate speaking. It's the same on different scale.
Shanghai was Disney opening a park in a market that has never had an American company open one.
Epic is third actual theme park to open in the Uni Orlando resort catelogue.

We don't know what Disney would do for sure for a new park stateside because we habe not had a new Disney park stateside in over about quarter century. Media is different in many ways now than it was about 25 years ago.
But we do know how they treat celebrations and attraction expansions and it is not all that different.

See WDW 50th.
(And don't do the pandemic excuse. Other parks did more with it)

I don't mean to be rude, but I feel like you're throwing up so much information that isn't relevant to a very simple point that it becomes hard to respond.

That simple point was just that the Mark Woodbury introduction to the opening night extravaganza struck a discordant note for how corporate it sounded. I don't think that would be an at all controversial observation if we were to imagine a similar message from Josh D'Amaro (who is the equivalent executive over at Disney). The fix is also very obvious and was mentioned by @Comped: Just start with Spielberg. So, you wonder why they didn't do that.

Honestly, it's such a minor point and I don't understand the back and forth. Of course I am not suggesting anything about what a hypothetical Disney opening ceremony for a park that doesn't exist would look like. As for Iger's opening day speeches in Shanghai, if anything it reinforces the point that it is better to keep the corporate side of things separate from the showmanship which you're hoping will connect emotionally with guests.

And, yes, WDW's 50th was bizarre. Perhaps the weirdest day in WDW history and the broader celebration was a flop. It doesn't have anything to do with my comment, though.

 

[999th Happy Haunt]

The park is actually open and we’re still having these conversations man. Thread is cooked.

Congrats to Universal, park looks great and appears to be running smoothly!

 

[Disstevefan1]

I don't mean to be rude, but I feel like you're throwing up so much information that isn't relevant to a very simple point that it becomes hard to respond.

That simple point was just that the Mark Woodbury introduction to the opening night extravaganza struck a discordant note for how corporate it sounded. I don't think that would be an at all controversial observation if we were to imagine a similar message from Josh D'Amaro (who is the equivalent executive over at Disney). The fix is also very obvious and was mentioned by @Comped: Just start with Spielberg. So, you wonder why they didn't do that.

Honestly, it's such a minor point and I don't understand the back and forth. Of course I am not suggesting anything about what a hypothetical Disney opening ceremony for a park that doesn't exist would look like. As for Iger's opening day speeches in Shanghai, if anything it reinforces the point that it is better to keep the corporate side of things separate from the showmanship which you're hoping will connect emotionally with guests.

And, yes, WDW's 50th was bizarre. Perhaps the weirdest day in WDW history and the broader celebration was a flop. It doesn't have anything to do with my comment, though.

The WDW 50th was garbage.

Wait, sorry, I am wrong, garbage has substance.

 

[Tom Morrow]

I mentioned this during the livestream, but the endless spew of corporate buzzwords and mandated approved points to make (amazing! Immersive! Storytelling! Next level! Etc) felt the hardest I’ve ever seen this stuff laid on and it was genuinely grating. Corporations should consider dialing this stuff down as it feels insincere even if they’re saying what they actually think.

For comparison… hate the man, but Ron DeSantis’s video reaction to the park felt genuine and more believe than anything uttered by anyone in the entire livestreams.

 

[BringMeTheHoriz]

I don't mean to be rude, but I feel like you're throwing up so much information that isn't relevant to a very simple point that it becomes hard to respond.

That simple point was just that the Mark Woodbury introduction to the opening night extravaganza struck a discordant note for how corporate it sounded. I don't think that would be an at all controversial observation if we were to imagine a similar message from Josh D'Amaro (who is the equivalent executive over at Disney). The fix is also very obvious and was mentioned by @Comped: Just start with Spielberg. So, you wonder why they didn't do that.

Honestly, it's such a minor point and I don't understand the back and forth. Of course I am not suggesting anything about what a hypothetical Disney opening ceremony for a park that doesn't exist would look like. As for Iger's opening day speeches in Shanghai, if anything it reinforces the point that it is better to keep the corporate side of things separate from the showmanship which you're hoping will connect emotionally with guests.

And, yes, WDW's 50th was bizarre. Perhaps the weirdest day in WDW history and the broader celebration was a flop. It doesn't have anything to do with my comment, though.

What happened on May 21 was meant for VIPs, media, and corporate executives from Comcast and UDX. In addition, your false dichotomy is also failing to address the fact that unlike Bob, Mark isn’t the highest man on the totem pole. Comcast were the ones who green lit this project, and it was/is a significant investment on Mark’s vision. There is no alternate universe (pun intended) where Mark DOESN’T get up and thank everyone who helped make it happen. Not only for this project but to keep Comcast interested in continuing to invest in all the future projects (even in the face of shifting macroeconomic tides).

Additionally, how you’re able to go as far off the trail as to fault Universal for not having a figure head as iconic as Walt in their history is beyond me. Walt ascended to become the enigma he was/is because he always put himself front and center, and because his fans have propped him up so strongly after his passing. Disney doesn’t miss an opportunity to shove Walt into the parks via a recorded quote or a statute. Even still, Bob Iger also puts himself front and center on literally everything he can (well, at least everything that goes well). I prefer my executives to stay in the background and make moves quietly, but it’s totally understandable that they want and deserve credit for executing this massive project on their post-Covid timeline. Also, don’t you think that adding Spielberg’s narration is UDX’s clear recognition that they didn’t want to go too deep on the corporate jargon? It serves as a clear balance and segway to the actual show.

All that said, I don’t expect to hear a Mark Woodbury voiceover on any continuing nighttime spectacular offerings. But who knows, maybe in 60 years time instead of a narrator talking about building a park in an old orange grove, there will be a narrator talking about raising this park from a toxic missile site, and then we’ll hear Mark’s voice echo across the cosmos once more.

 

[BrianLo]

The fix is also very obvious and was mentioned by @Comped: Just start with Spielberg. So, you wonder why they didn't do that.

Miyamoto was also there and would have been worth trotting out.

I know the company doesn’t want to be Disney… but it shows their corporate overlords flaws, is that it’s still a big ole utility corporation that bought a studio. There’s no Comcast Con. But, why isn’t that an eventual desire they have? I know we’ll be shortly explained to why it is a good thing that don’t have it.

They have such a powerful spectrum of licensed properties now that frankly have their own bigger fandoms than corporate Comcast. Particularly looking at Nintendo and Potter, which frankly rival some of Disney’s studio biggest arms as the best of the best; with a massive reservoir of their own fandoms.

 

[BrianLo]

https://www.thrill-data.com/epic-universe-tickets

I do find this quite fascinating and I won’t portend this means a thing, as I don’t really know their booking curves.

It does speak to the ceiling they’ll have and also that the early ticket sell out wasn’t this glamorous achievement. Boo to you and various MK ticketed events sell out at double the capacity. The attendance looks pretty soft even after the capacity limits release.l

 

[BringMeTheHoriz]

Miyamoto was also there and would have been worth trotting out.

I know the company doesn’t want to be Disney… but it shows their corporate overlords flaws, is that it’s still a big ole utility corporation that bought a studio. There’s no Comcast Con. But, why isn’t that an eventual desire they have? I know we’ll be shortly explained to why it is a good thing that don’t have it.

They have such a powerful spectrum of licensed properties now that frankly have their own bigger fandoms than corporate Comcast. Particularly looking at Nintendo and Potter, which frankly rival some of Disney’s studio biggest arms as the best of the best; with a massive reservoir of their own fandoms.

Owning properties is different than holding rights to properties. For Nintendo and HP, it’s the latter.

 

[BrianLo]

Owning properties is different than holding rights to properties. For Nintendo and HP, it’s the latter.

That was my commentary. They have to look outside themselves for fandoms and seem a bit resistant to building it themselves. With the one exception that HHN has some sub culture behind it.

 

[BringMeTheHoriz]

That was my commentary. They have to look outside themselves for fandoms and seem a bit resistant to building it themselves. With the one exception that HHN has some sub culture behind it.

Sorry I misread that!

 

[Agent H]

That was my commentary. They have to look outside themselves for fandoms and seem a bit resistant to building it themselves. With the one exception that HHN has some sub culture behind it.

I would argue Jurassic Park is one more exception.

 

[Jrb1979]

https://www.thrill-data.com/epic-universe-tickets

I do find this quite fascinating and I won’t portend this means a thing, as I don’t really know their booking curves.

It does speak to the ceiling they’ll have and also that the early ticket sell out wasn’t this glamorous achievement. Boo to you and various MK ticketed events sell out at double the capacity. The attendance looks pretty soft even after the capacity limits release.l

It's done on this way on purpose to slowly increase capacity til they know the attractions are running with little downtime. IMO it's a great idea.

I will last commentary like this and others is part where my disdain for what's happened to Disney. The Disney fandom is very snobby in that many look down at parks that aren't Disney.

 

[MrPromey]

I mentioned this during the livestream, but the endless spew of corporate buzzwords and mandated approved points to make (amazing! Immersive! Storytelling! Next level! Etc) felt the most hardest I’ve ever seen this stuff laid on and it was genuinely grating. Corporations should consider dialing this stuff down as it feels insincere even if they’re saying what they actually think.

For comparison… hate the man, but Ron DeSantis’s video reaction to the park felt genuine and more believe than anything uttered by anyone in the entire livestreams.

I think they just gave themselves too much time to fill. Back in the olden days when every other park opened in central Florida, this was done on broadcast TV. They got what? Two hours tops (with commercials) to do this kind of thing, right?

This went for - wasn't it close to four and a half hours?

How the heck do you fill that much time and actually keep it interesting?

I believe the luxury of Youtube being able to remove all constraints was their downfall. I think there was a good two hours of solid stuff within that stream and if they'd only done two hours and focused on that substance, it would have played a lot better.

I get it. People in the company are excited about opening this after over 25 years of planning and speculation and they want to make sure every point of pride is known and interview every single person they can and point out every single thing they can think of, using hosts who display exaggerated excitement over the most uninteresting things - like the general merch - but it feels like they basically lost sight of their audience when setting this up.

Instead of live-streaming what must have been a five hour event meant for the people in attendance, they should have recorded it, edited it overnight and then played it on the actual evening it opened.

 

[Tom Morrow]

Should it be concerning that almost every ride is a walk on and it’s the first Saturday of official opening AND it’s Memorial Day weekend?

I understand they capped the attendance low, but I get the feeling this is lower than even that.

 

[Moth]

They need to figure out a solution for the Toothless meet and greet, fast. The long waits, outside nature is going to be bad come July.

 

[Animaniac93-98]

Should it be concerning that almost every ride is a walk on and it’s the first Saturday of official opening AND it’s Memorial Day weekend?

Doesn't this happen with every new theme park?

People think it's going to be super busy which leads it to be ironically not busy?

 

[BrianLo]

It's done on this way on purpose to slowly increase capacity til they know the attractions are running with little downtime. IMO it's a great idea.

I will last commentary like this and others is part where my disdain for what's happened to Disney. The Disney fandom is very snobby in that many look down at parks that aren't Disney.

It’s not the next six weeks, but rather the ticket sell through once they open up to 22k. It’s pretty interesting they are able to scrape how many tickets remain for sale each day. The park isn’t going to get remotely close to its 7.5-8M capacity for quite a while, if that’s predictive.

Though, as I said, I don’t really know theme park booking curves and maybe they tend to be very close in.

Doesn't this happen with every new theme park?

People think it's going to be super busy which leads it to be ironically not busy?

Shanghai was pretty busy. Other than opening day, which started at noon and was definitely capacity limited. This seems to be a capacity limitation issue, I wonder if they’ll just open up more sales. There’s little point in it being “sold out” and running walk on lines.

On the flip side, maybe they are caught off guard that Ministry is suddenly working.

 

[EricsBiscuit]

On the subject of changes to the rides, some additions have been made to Monsters Unchained since the earlier preview days:

- Haptic feedback on the vehicles (now VERY pronounced and unmistakable)
- Heat effect when Dracula breaks free.
- Water splash effect when Wolfman is goring... something.
- Wooden dummies on the pre-show demonstration Kuka seats, along with wooden figures of the monsters around it. These wooden figures are the same ones Ygor is demonstrating with in the safety video.
- On-ride photo now working, I believe it is taken as Wolfman swipes at you.

- Rumors of the vehicles being programmed with different movements, but cannot confirm.

Now, if they could just change or face you away from that awful view of the giant curtain after the first Dracula... and maybe work on the lighting a bit more to only illuminate what you should see. At least do something about the curtain. You not only see the giant curtain light up, but it tilts you toward the track and you see theater lights below. It completely takes you out of it.

Been on it today twice and it does feel smoother than during the previews.