News Disney plans to accelerate Parks investment to $60 billion over 10 years

Disstevefan1

Well-Known Member
Great points.

Regardless if you love or hate the plans that have been announced, this is all bad news for any theme park in the US with plans to expand or add attractions.

No one should celebrate this nonsense.
IgerExcuseBoard.jpg
 

Trauma

Well-Known Member
Great points.

Regardless if you love or hate the plans that have been announced, this is all bad news for any theme park in the US with plans to expand or add attractions.

No one should celebrate this nonsense.
Whether you agree or not with the tariffs or not, I do not think you should set a countries fiscal policy based on its effect on building theme park rides.

Disney has been sitting on its hands.

They could have started these projects years ago.

Iger has only Iger to blame.
 

Disstevefan1

Well-Known Member
Whether you agree or not with the tariffs or not, I do not think you should set a countries fiscal policy based on its effect on building theme park rides.

Disney has been sitting on its hands.

They could have started these projects years ago.

Iger has only Iger to blame.
THIS.gif
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
too hot. lol. It is true that Disney is really good at finding excuses so they can disappoint us.
Disney wants to spend that allocated money on the things they announced. They're not looking to cut back because it's the money they want to spend on the bet that parks continue to have a high ROI.

If they *have to* cut back because of tariffs or recession, it'd be because of tariffs and/or recession.
 

Andrew C

You know what's funny?
Disney wants to spend that allocated money on the things they announced. They're not looking to cut back because it's the money they want to spend on the bet that parks continue to have a high ROI.

If they *have to* cut back because of tariffs or recession, it'd be because of tariffs and/or recession.
I feel like they don't really want to spend the money or go all out. When there is a hiccup, Disney panics, and cut after cut ensues. Meanwhile, Universal decides not to do much theming on a show building...

Their timing always seems to just suck, they always underdeliver...it cannot be a coincidence every time. It can't always be someone else's fault.
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
I feel like they don't really want to spend the money or go all out. When there is a hiccup, Disney panics, and cut after cut ensues. Meanwhile, Universal decides not to do much theming on a show building...

Their timing always seems to just suck, they always underdeliver...it cannot be a coincidence every time. It can't always be someone else's fault.
Likewise it can't always be Disney's fault when there are things outside of their control: A Great Recession, COVID, being a political target, tariffs, etc...
 

Disney Analyst

Well-Known Member
Whether you agree or not with the tariffs or not, I do not think you should set a countries fiscal policy based on its effect on building theme park rides.

Disney has been sitting on its hands.

They could have started these projects years ago.

Iger has only Iger to blame.

This will impact all companies trying to make an investment in the local economy. Not just a Disney or Iger problem.

All theme park providers looking to expand, create jobs, will be impacted.
 

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
Whether you agree or not with the tariffs or not, I do not think you should set a countries fiscal policy based on its effect on building theme park rides.
Amusement park rides are a great example of how the narrative of manufacturing in the US, which had been increasing and facing labor shortages, is not always true. American companies aren’t being outcompeted on price but quality.

Also, amusement rides should be part of developing trade policy. Tariffs have not traditionally been set on a blanket per territory basis, but instead on a granular level where different types of goods are charged different duties. That’s why duty free shops at airports all tend to focus around certain products. It’s how we got Nix v Hedden, the Supreme Court case that unanimously held that tomatoes are a vegetable for trade purposes.
 

Sir_Cliff

Well-Known Member
Whether you agree or not with the tariffs or not, I do not think you should set a countries fiscal policy based on its effect on building theme park rides.

Disney has been sitting on its hands.

They could have started these projects years ago.

Iger has only Iger to blame.
Regardless of your opinion about the policies (which are not exactly consistent from one day to the next), the impact they would have on future projects is a relevant point in a general sense.

If the outcome is that they would be negative, that should at least provide some food for thought rather than just asserting it's Disney's own fault as they should have already built everything in the past.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom