• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

News Splash Mountain retheme to Princess and the Frog - Tiana's Bayou Adventure

Status
Not open for further replies.

RSoxNo1

Well-Known Member
I'm fairly certain that is the basic plan, reskins of the BatB animatronics. They've already developed them. Beast for Louis, Human Beast for Naveen, Belle for Tiana. Saves money on R&D.
Any humidity concerns here? I know the Na'vi Shaman operates close to water but that was previously a concern.
 

RSoxNo1

Well-Known Member
I know nothing about anything regarding AAs. I am sure that WDI has accounted for this. Is it something they need to account for, definitely.
I'm sure they do when the original AAs were built for a water ride, I just didn't know if there were differences in the Beauty and the Beast AAs.

Disney has put some wildly impressive animatronics near water, I don't doubt their ability to do it.
 

owlsandcoffee

Well-Known Member
I'm sure they do when the original AAs were built for a water ride, I just didn't know if there were differences in the Beauty and the Beast AAs.

Disney has put some wildly impressive animatronics near water, I don't doubt their ability to do it.
That I'm not sure about!
 

Kirby86

Well-Known Member
That video is so disrespectful to all the imagineers that worked on splash mountain and America sings. Not one mention of the preservation of the America Sings AAs the last project Marc Davis ever worked on.
Yeah Disney is going to pretend that the current theme for the ride never existed if the behind the attraction show is still around when this project is finished they will gloss over the current theme if it's mentioned at all. As for this video although this is said to be for both Disneyland and Magic Kingdom it seems like the focus is mostly on Land.
 

Sir_Cliff

Well-Known Member
That video is so disrespectful to all the imagineers that worked on splash mountain and America sings. Not one mention of the preservation of the America Sings AAs the last project Marc Davis ever worked on.
My impression was always that Marc Davis was annoyed at Tony Baxter for using the America Sings figures in Splash Mountain. I don't think that was any happier a repurposing from his perspective than the Princess and the Frog redo is for a lot of people on here.
 

DCLcruiser

Well-Known Member
I think of all the concerns, the idea that the mountain exterior will suddenly clash with the rest of Frontierland is the one I understand the least. If anything, the mountain exterior is a bit of an odd fit for an attraction set in a bayou. As you say, I'm sure it will fit about as much after the redo as it does now as the changes aren't that extreme.

I also honestly hope that any re-theming to New Orleans/Louisiana happens beyond the railway track. I don't see any need to re-theme any of the existing Frontierland shops or restaurants, which I think would look a little odd if they were to leave the rest of them more or less the same.
Louisiana is supper mountainous (JK). I don't think it will ruin enough trips to make them demolish the mountain for a swamp.

I think Pacos Bill's could be redone as it takes us from the Gulf of Mexico (Pirates) and leads us West, towards Splash and Thunder Mt. Louisiana leads to the West.

Wait, you think this re-theme is going to result in a net positive financially for TWDC? 😂 They aren't even going to break even on it.
Do you mean the cost to re-theme will be so great that it's a write-off?

Or do you mean that Tiana can't bring in enough revenue?
 

Roger_the_pianist

Well-Known Member
Isn't Splash Mountain just a hill? Chickapin Hill? There aren't a lot of significant mountains in central Georgia where Song of the South is set, especially heading south from Atlanta, which is where I gather Johnny's grandmother's plantation is located.

People making the arguments about no mountains in Louisiana, Tiana out of place in Frontierland, etc...are just people who don't want the new project to go forward because they are defending the "lost cause" of original Splash 😑
 

Ghost93

Well-Known Member
Yeah Disney is going to pretend that the current theme for the ride never existed if the behind the attraction show is still around when this project is finished they will gloss over the current theme if it's mentioned at all. As for this video although this is said to be for both Disneyland and Magic Kingdom it seems like the focus is mostly on Land.
Disney has really gone out of its way to avoid mentioning Song of the South as much as possible. While media outlets have made the connection that Disney is replacing Splash to get away from the SotS theme, in all press releases released by Disney related to the retheming there hasn't been anything said about SotS...just statements about the power of diversity and how Tiana is inclusive. I honestly don't think Disney will ever fully address the Song of the South controversy.

For example, in the Imagineering Story on Disney Plus, Angela Bassett makes one brief comment about how Splash Mountain is based on "an old, problematic movie called Song of the South" and she gives no further elaboration. The documentary did not explain:
1. Why Song of the South was problematic
2. Why Song of the South was chosen as a theme in the first place
3. How the Disney company's relationship with SotS has evolved since the development of Splash Mountain. SotS was released FOUR times between 1972 and 1986. In that era of Disney history, it was a profitable movie and generally regarded as a Disney classic by white Americans (it did still receive criticism from Black Americans, but the criticism wasn't as prevalent as the original 1946 release).


The documentary could have said how the ride wanted to capitalize on the Brer characters (which were popular in the parks at the time) while leaving behind the more offensive and racist aspects of the movie (The plantation setting, Uncle Remus, the Tar Baby, etc.). But Disney didn't do that because they didn't want people to dwell on Song of the South or the past mistakes they made.

I believe that once the retheme does happen, it would be a good opportunity for Disney to have a "Behind the Attraction" episode that explores the creation of the original Splash Mountain and thoroughly explains WHY it was problematic and why it was rethemed to Princess and the Frog. But knowing Disney, I doubt such a serious and uncomfortable topic like that will be addressed.
 

Captain Neo

Well-Known Member
Isn't Splash Mountain just a hill? Chickapin Hill? There aren't a lot of significant mountains in central Georgia where Song of the South is set, especially heading south from Atlanta, which is where I gather Johnny's grandmother's plantation is located.

People making the arguments about no mountains in Louisiana, Tiana out of place in Frontierland, etc...are just people who don't want the new project to go forward because they are defending the "lost cause" of original Splash 😑
GA has Stone Mountain
 

DCLcruiser

Well-Known Member
Disney has really gone out of its way to avoid mentioning Song of the South as much as possible. While media outlets have made the connection that Disney is replacing Splash to get away from the SotS theme, in all press releases released by Disney related to the retheming there hasn't been anything said about SotS...just statements about the power of diversity and how Tiana is inclusive. I honestly don't think Disney will ever fully address the Song of the South controversy.

For example, in the Imagineering Story on Disney Plus, Angela Bassett makes one brief comment about how Splash Mountain is based on "an old, problematic movie called Song of the South" and she gives no further elaboration. The documentary did not explain:
1. Why Song of the South was problematic
2. Why Song of the South was chosen as a theme in the first place
3. How the Disney company's relationship with SotS has evolved since the development of Splash Mountain. SotS was released FOUR times between 1972 and 1986. In that era of Disney history, it was a profitable movie and generally regarded as a Disney classic by white Americans (it did still receive criticism from Black Americans, but the criticism wasn't as prevalent as the original 1946 release).


The documentary could have said how the ride wanted to capitalize on the Brer characters (which were popular in the parks at the time) while leaving behind the more offensive and racist aspects of the movie (The plantation setting, Uncle Remus, the Tar Baby, etc.). But Disney didn't do that because they didn't want people to dwell on Song of the South or the past mistakes they made.

I believe that once the retheme does happen, it would be a good opportunity for Disney to have a "Behind the Attraction" episode that explores the creation of the original Splash Mountain and thoroughly explains WHY it was problematic and why it was rethemed to Princess and the Frog. But knowing Disney, I doubt such a serious and uncomfortable topic like that will be addressed.
Just let it fade into oblivion.

This is like history. You learn about the bad things, and the grey areas, in higher levels of learning. In school, at museums, etc. You don't need to rehash it in cartoons.

I agree Disney should use this as a teachable moment, and Hulu allows them to do it. That being said, the movie itself is an issue and they don't want to give it light, so it doesn't come up directly.

The updated ride will probably retain enough Splash elements to provide a nod to the nostalgia of the old ride.
 

Ghost93

Well-Known Member
Just let it fade into oblivion.

This is like history. You learn about the bad things, and the grey areas, in higher levels of learning. In school, at museums, etc. You don't need to rehash it in cartoons.

I agree Disney should use this as a teachable moment, and Hulu allows them to do it. That being said, the movie itself is an issue and they don't want to give it light, so it doesn't come up directly.

The updated ride will probably retain enough Splash elements to provide a nod to the nostalgia of the old ride.
I'm not saying Disney should support/glorify Song of the South, because they shouldn't. I'm saying they should at some point release a documentary explaining what it was, why it happened and why it was a mistake. But as it is, the company has taken ridiculous lengths to avoid mentioning it.

They don't have to address it of course, but I think it would be a good move for the company to finally examine its history in a documentary format, explain how they've evolved as a company and then move on.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom