GoofGoof
Premium Member
NY/NJ and the Northeast where the first areas who got hit with the first wave. That’s when most of the death occurred when community spread wasn’t even known due to lack of testing and was already rampant before things were restricted. FL had a delayed start of the first wave so had advanced warning of the problem. What prevented FL from having as many deaths as NY/NJ is they locked down sooner before their first wave took full hold. That’s a fact. So by making the argument that FL handled things better you are arguing that their stay at home orders were more successful. It’s not like FL stayed open and still did better. They had stay at home orders in the Spring just like everyone else. You yourself were “locked down” and unable to even leave the house. I‘d say that is proof the stay at home orders worked well in FL.There's nothing to "figure out." Either you put in severe restrictions that take away people's freedoms and significantly reduce the spread while the restrictions are in place or you give people information and let them decide what they want to do to protect themselves. Also, if you show your data per capita, you'll find that your great state of NJ has over twice the deaths per capita as FL and FL is #20 and a hair below national average despite a population that skews elderly and a governor that is apparently incompetent and trying to kill as many people as possible (according to some on here).
Your debate style is impressive. Just keep changing the subject and speaking in riddles.
Now if you want to compare deaths per capita after say May 1, I think you will find NJ did much better than FL. Again, proof the restrictions work.