That a matter of opinion which has been debated for almost 2000 pages now.
And if you go back to page 1, you’ll see that once we made it just a few responses in, the idiocy was clearly palpable. That’s why it continues. Nothing new under the sun.
That a matter of opinion which has been debated for almost 2000 pages now.
BTW, I still blame you for starting this thread!And if you go back to page 1, you’ll see that once we made it just a few responses in, the idiocy was clearly palpable. That’s why it continues. Nothing new under the sun.
Hippocratic oath?Aren’t we all required to act a certain way when we’re on the clock. I don’t know how many people are defined by their profession outside of work. Geez I’d never be able to drink beer or eat fried food if that was the case.
That doesn't apply to my personal life. It applies at work. I'm also not a physician.Hippocratic oath?
Hmm...first time I've ever heard of a part-time oath...That doesn't apply to my personal life. It applies at work.
I know. You said any profession. I was just thinking of one. And, actually, you are correct. It doesn’t actually mean anything. It’s just a tradition and isn’t really a practical oath. That aside, I think this starts to venture into ethics. If your job requires a certain type of behavior in order to protect people it would logically follow that the ethical thing would be to continue that behavior outside of work. I am no philosopher, though, so I am just processing out loud hereThat doesn't apply to my personal life. It applies at work. I'm also not a physician.
Are you referring to just masks or do you expect healthcare workers to be role models in all areas.I know. You said any profession. I was just thinking of one. And it does apply outside of work in that case. Just an example
I edited my response. SorryAre you referring to just masks or do you expect healthcare to be role models in all areas.
There are healthcare workers that smoke, do drugs, overeat, and participate in other bad behaviors. The Hippocratic oath is basically an oath to protect your patients. It's nice people have this heroic vision of people in healthcare, but they are just people struggling to get through life like everyone else.I edited my response. Sorry
Fair enough. I do think there will be healthcare workers at all ends of this spectrum and everywhere in between. Of course they are regular people. Most of my friends are doctors and PAs. I was trying to Extrapolate a more difficult issue. We all relax outside of work. But I would imagine a lot of us try to uphold the Same moral ideals no matter where we are and are consistent in our behavior in terms of how we treat others no matter the situation. Surely this is true for many people. It seems logical (but you are anecdotally saying this is incorrect) that if a person knew something was life threatening to people while at work it wouldThere are healthcare workers that smoke, do drugs, overeat, and participate in other bad behaviors. The Hippocratic oath is basically an oath to protect your patients. It's nice people have this heroic vision of people in healthcare, but they are just people struggling to get through life like everyone else.
The influenza virus was isolated in the early 1930s and they still don't know exactly how it spreads. Over 80 years and it's still just hindsight studies and best educated guesses.Lack of understanding of the purpose for wearing a mask. No different in a medical setting than it is for this virus. It is to slow or stop transmission of particles from you to others.
I am amazed that 6+ months into this that it would not be clear how this spreads,
Fair enough but the person would have to believe that not wearing a mask is life threatening. Keep in mind masks are not mandated in many cities across the US. That being said I I really don’t think we need another mask debate on this thread.Fair enough. I do think there will be healthcare workers at all ends of this spectrum and everywhere in between. Of course they are regular people. Most of my friends are doctors and PAs. I was trying to Extrapolate a more difficult issue. We all relax outside of work. But I would imagine a lot of us try to uphold the Same moral ideals no matter where we are and are consistent in our behavior in terms of how we treat others no matter the situation. Surely this is true for many people. It seems logical (but you are anecdotally saying this is incorrect) that if a person knew something was life threatening to people while at work it would
Still be so outside of the hospital. So wouldn’t that person want to continue protecting others in that real
World scenario?
One of Denmark's top immunologists is wondering about Sweden now too
![]()
Tog vi fejl om flokimmunitet? De meget lave svenske smittetal tyder på det
Sverige har nu en af Europas laveste smitterater, og nyt studie forklarer, hvorfor de kan have opnået tilstrækkelig grad af immunitet til at bremse smitten tidligere end ventet. Måske er de »færdige med epidemien«, siger dansk forsker.politiken.dk
One of Denmark's top immunologists is wondering about Sweden now too
![]()
Tog vi fejl om flokimmunitet? De meget lave svenske smittetal tyder på det
Sverige har nu en af Europas laveste smitterater, og nyt studie forklarer, hvorfor de kan have opnået tilstrækkelig grad af immunitet til at bremse smitten tidligere end ventet. Måske er de »færdige med epidemien«, siger dansk forsker.politiken.dk
Unfortunately, behind a paywall for me. (And in Danish, but Google Translate is truly an amazing feature.)
The science is not proven with a peer reviewed scientific study, but there’s enough known about how viral diseases spread in general to make an educated guess that it’s going to be at least partially effective. There hasn’t been a formal study like the one you describe that shows hand washing works either. Should people stop washing their hands now since it hasn’t been definitely proven to help? I get people want something to ”hang their hat on” in an argument when they just don’t feel like doing something, but I don’t buy into that logic. If you want to be against masks, just own it. Don’t try to make it like the science is on your side, it’s not.The influenza virus was isolated in the early 1930s and they still don't know exactly how it spreads. Over 80 years and it's still just hindsight studies and best educated guesses.
It isn't remotely clear how SARS-CoV-2 spreads.
To really know if face coverings (not masks which have specifications to them) do anything, you'd need to put infected people in rooms with uninfected people and have some rooms with the infected wearing face coverings and some not and see what the rate of transmission is to the uninfected. Since nobody is volunteering to be part of an experiment like that, the "science" is not clear or proven.
It can be (and has been) proven that washing hands removes viruses and bacteria from the skin. It is impossible to transfer a particle to your nose, mouth or eyes if it isn't on your skin. The experiments don't need to be done with every different bacteria or virus as long as they have similar physical properties to those that have been experimented with.The science is not proven with a peer reviewed scientific study, but there’s enough known about how viral diseases spread in general to make an educated guess that it’s going to be at least partially effective. There hasn’t been a formal study like the one you describe that shows hand washing works either. Should people stop washing their hands now since it hasn’t been definitely proven to help? I get people want something to ”hang their hat on” in an argument when they just don’t feel like doing something, but I don’t buy into that logic. If you want to be against masks, just own it. Don’t try to make it like the science is on your side, it’s not.
Same here on the paywall. @SamusAranX can you give a brief summary?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.