Hmmmm...so why would you love it then? It’s mostly just scenery. If you aren’t a fan of Star Wars...how does scenery translate to “awesome”
You’re argument applies more to avatar...because nobody remembered much about the movie before the land opened anyway
That is “like” in a definition not yet published by webster’s Where “like” means “not like much at all”
I’m really interested to see this...luckily I won’t have to fight any crowds in Disneyland to do it
...
But here’s the problem with “look”. There’s no substance to it. In the end, the rides, shows, food and to a lesser degree shops are what you HAVE to have for longterm success.
The DL has started off not good on all fronts. The second ride will help...but can it compensate for known design flaws now?
We’ll see.
Wdw will have the exact same flaws in a park that can’t handle capacity...by the way.
But that didn’t go to the original poster’s (documented) belief that if you don’t say everything done in Orlando is an “amazing, magical experience”...it ruins their day in Cleveland...or wherever.
It’s personal. You are consistent.
You’re premise is actually erring on the side of erring...as Disneyland has far more options to alleviate potential crowding issues than mgm would in its wildest dreams.