DHS Rock ‘n’ Roller Coaster to be Re-Themed?

begood524

Well-Known Member
So the Parks Blog said that they'll be announcing some things during their live stream of the new show on the Chinese Theater. How likely is it that it's an announcement of RNRC's retheme?
 

kthomas105

Well-Known Member
I know that the average lifespan of a steel coaster varies based on upkeep, design and lots of other factors but part of me wonders if RnRC might have a shorter lifespan due to the way in which it was constructed. I'm sure there is a way to replace worn track but is it worth the trouble? Remember RnRC was built first and then the building was built around it. This is opposite of what Disney is currently doing with GotG at EPCOT. If it is too expensive to reimagine/update I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't just rip it out and start over with something brand new. This is basically what they did with the GMR. And it would give them the option to open up that side of Sunset more and incorporate Sunset Ranch expansion plot in an over-arching redevelopment the way it was originaly intentioned for the Roger Rabbit section.
 

FigmentFan82

Well-Known Member
Love me some RnRC, but it seems the inevitable change is coming. Decriers of nostalgia, your pleas are most liekyl going to fall on deaf ears. Less a question of if than when. Aerosmith had their time to shine, but it's time to put them out to pasture. As a big fan of the Muppets Dr.Teeth and Electric Mayhem would be suppurb re-theme in my book. I woul;dn't put it past them to try something Pixar though, as that brand is hugely popular.
 

matt9112

Well-Known Member
I know that the average lifespan of a steel coaster varies based on upkeep, design and lots of other factors but part of me wonders if RnRC might have a shorter lifespan due to the way in which it was constructed. I'm sure there is a way to replace worn track but is it worth the trouble? Remember RnRC was built first and then the building was built around it. This is opposite of what Disney is currently doing with GotG at EPCOT. If it is too expensive to reimagine/update I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't just rip it out and start over with something brand new. This is basically what they did with the GMR. And it would give them the option to open up that side of Sunset more and incorporate Sunset Ranch expansion plot in an over-arching redevelopment the way it was originaly intentioned for the Roger Rabbit section.

likely has a far greater life span assuming stress of operation is normal since it isnt affected by the elements.
 

trainplane3

Well-Known Member
I know that the average lifespan of a steel coaster varies based on upkeep, design and lots of other factors but part of me wonders if RnRC might have a shorter lifespan due to the way in which it was constructed. I'm sure there is a way to replace worn track but is it worth the trouble? Remember RnRC was built first and then the building was built around it. This is opposite of what Disney is currently doing with GotG at EPCOT. If it is too expensive to reimagine/update I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't just rip it out and start over with something brand new. This is basically what they did with the GMR. And it would give them the option to open up that side of Sunset more and incorporate Sunset Ranch expansion plot in an over-arching redevelopment the way it was originaly intentioned for the Roger Rabbit section.
RnRC is only nearing 20 years old at this point. That's not very old for a coaster at all, indoor or outdoor. If they want to improve the ride experience then they should just get the new Vekoma trains without the headbanging restraints (like DLP SM).
Hyperspace%2Bvehicle1.jpg



I'm still a bit puzzled by why Hulk had it's track replaced only 16 years after it opened.
 

Justin Walker

Active Member
I know that the average lifespan of a steel coaster varies based on upkeep, design and lots of other factors but part of me wonders if RnRC might have a shorter lifespan due to the way in which it was constructed. I'm sure there is a way to replace worn track but is it worth the trouble? Remember RnRC was built first and then the building was built around it. This is opposite of what Disney is currently doing with GotG at EPCOT. If it is too expensive to reimagine/update I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't just rip it out and start over with something brand new. This is basically what they did with the GMR. And it would give them the option to open up that side of Sunset more and incorporate Sunset Ranch expansion plot in an over-arching redevelopment the way it was originaly intentioned for the Roger Rabbit section.

The life span of a roller coaster is a lot longer than 20 years! Especially when said roller coaster is in an enclosed building and not exposed to the elements. There are coasters all over the country that are 40/50/60/70/80 years old. Now most of those are wooden not steel because steel coasters have not been around as long, but the lifespan and maintenance of a steel coaster is even longer than a wooden one.

I am all for Disney building more roller coasters, they don't have nearly enough, but why do it at the expense of an existing coaster??
 

Justin Walker

Active Member
Agreed. It is sad that many people in this thread instead of fighting against the idea of a change are just speculating what it could be. There is no reason the ride should change.

ToT is one of the worst things Disney Anaheim did. It ruined the years they spent fixing the theme of California Adventure and ruined a great ride.

RnR is unique and I love it. Keep in mind I have no nostalgia for it as I only rode it for the first time 6 months ago. It is an awesome ride and Aerosmith is a great choice.

So sad. Lets go picket in the streets to save RnRC! Instead of discussing it on an internet forum! I'm sure Disney will do exactly as we say if we FIGHT!
 

Heppenheimer

Well-Known Member
The life span of a roller coaster is a lot longer than 20 years! Especially when said roller coaster is in an enclosed building and not exposed to the elements. There are coasters all over the country that are 40/50/60/70/80 years old. Now most of those are wooden not steel because steel coasters have not been around as long, but the lifespan and maintenance of a steel coaster is even longer than a wooden one.

I am all for Disney building more roller coasters, they don't have nearly enough, but why do it at the expense of an existing coaster??
Considering that the Loch Ness Monster at Busch Gardens is over 40 years old, operates in a very humid part of the country with much greater extremes of weather than Orlando and shows very little signs of age, I think its a safe bet that the infrastructure of Rockn' Rollercoaster is probably in pretty good shape currently.
 

aliceismad

Well-Known Member
With Toy Story Land just built and Star Wars opening soon, I would think the powers that be would have their eyes focused on the other parks for the next several years. We had Pandora in AK, now HS gets some new stuff, then Epcot and MK. How likely is it really that they throw more money into major rethemeing of RNRC (or the Indy show, or anything really) for the next decade(s)? Especially when they know they need capacity for the Star Wars crowd. Isn't this a "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" situation for now? I dunno.
 

aliceismad

Well-Known Member
I know that the average lifespan of a steel coaster varies based on upkeep, design and lots of other factors but part of me wonders if RnRC might have a shorter lifespan due to the way in which it was constructed. I'm sure there is a way to replace worn track but is it worth the trouble? Remember RnRC was built first and then the building was built around it. This is opposite of what Disney is currently doing with GotG at EPCOT. If it is too expensive to reimagine/update I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't just rip it out and start over with something brand new. This is basically what they did with the GMR. And it would give them the option to open up that side of Sunset more and incorporate Sunset Ranch expansion plot in an over-arching redevelopment the way it was originaly intentioned for the Roger Rabbit section.
Seems if they were going to replace worn track or wholesale replace a coaster, they'd start with Space Mountain. If it's not a safety concern, it seems cost prohibitive to demo and built new just for the heck of it.
 

DeletedAccount55555

Well-Known Member
I'm still a bit puzzled by why Hulk had it's track replaced only 16 years after it opened.

This is just my guess, but perhaps they felt compelled to be proactive about the track considering how the Marvel licensing agreement hinges on maintenance. Universal has to know Disney is watching Marvel Super Hero Island closely for any flaw that could allow them to nuke that contract.

Since that replacement took most of 2016, perhaps Universal also chose to get it done before closing Dragon Challenge, making sure IoA's remaining coaster was in tip top shape.
 

ᗩLᘿᑕ ֊ᗩζᗩᗰ

Hᴏᴜsᴇ ᴏʄ  Mᴀɢɪᴄ
Premium Member
I got an idea, if Disney wants to make a new land. How about a whole Haunted section with Tower of Terror, a rethemed Hearse coaster with ghosts and a new restaurant?

Tie it to an IP like //REMOVED// and you'd really have a idea worth pitching to TDO.
*IP removed out of fear the suits would actually consider it.
 

WDWTank

Well-Known Member
Change the band to AC/DC, Bon Jovi, KISS, Led Zeppelin, Van Halen, etc. Or a mix of bands. That’s all that could be done. Honestly the ride is fine as is. It’s always popular. One thing I will say though, instead of spending money on a licensing agreement with the NBA for a restaurant, Disney should’ve used that money for something already proven like for RNRC.
 

Rose&Crown

Well-Known Member
After seeing the new night show it popped in my head they can do a wreck it Ralph theme. Not exactly what I would like to see but just a thought.
 

Kram Sacul

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
Yes
A retheme is one of several possibilities being contemplated at the moment. There’s quite a few different options proposed.

I would hope renewing Aerosmith's contract would be one of them. It would be certainly be cheaper. I would hate for Disney to butcher another of their more popular attractions with a rushed half-assed overlay no one asked for. DHS has many issues with some of them being finally addressed but RNR's theme is not one of them.
 

aw14

Well-Known Member
I personally would've to see a Cars coaster, if we go the IP route. Keeping a similar track layout would still maintain the demographic.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom