This is what happened to California Adventure. (sadly)
I know that the average lifespan of a steel coaster varies based on upkeep, design and lots of other factors but part of me wonders if RnRC might have a shorter lifespan due to the way in which it was constructed. I'm sure there is a way to replace worn track but is it worth the trouble? Remember RnRC was built first and then the building was built around it. This is opposite of what Disney is currently doing with GotG at EPCOT. If it is too expensive to reimagine/update I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't just rip it out and start over with something brand new. This is basically what they did with the GMR. And it would give them the option to open up that side of Sunset more and incorporate Sunset Ranch expansion plot in an over-arching redevelopment the way it was originaly intentioned for the Roger Rabbit section.
If they have to change it, this is precisely what I hope they do. They have proven themselves incredibly poor at retheming rides over the years.I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't just rip it out and start over with something brand new.
RnRC is only nearing 20 years old at this point. That's not very old for a coaster at all, indoor or outdoor. If they want to improve the ride experience then they should just get the new Vekoma trains without the headbanging restraints (like DLP SM).I know that the average lifespan of a steel coaster varies based on upkeep, design and lots of other factors but part of me wonders if RnRC might have a shorter lifespan due to the way in which it was constructed. I'm sure there is a way to replace worn track but is it worth the trouble? Remember RnRC was built first and then the building was built around it. This is opposite of what Disney is currently doing with GotG at EPCOT. If it is too expensive to reimagine/update I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't just rip it out and start over with something brand new. This is basically what they did with the GMR. And it would give them the option to open up that side of Sunset more and incorporate Sunset Ranch expansion plot in an over-arching redevelopment the way it was originaly intentioned for the Roger Rabbit section.
I know that the average lifespan of a steel coaster varies based on upkeep, design and lots of other factors but part of me wonders if RnRC might have a shorter lifespan due to the way in which it was constructed. I'm sure there is a way to replace worn track but is it worth the trouble? Remember RnRC was built first and then the building was built around it. This is opposite of what Disney is currently doing with GotG at EPCOT. If it is too expensive to reimagine/update I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't just rip it out and start over with something brand new. This is basically what they did with the GMR. And it would give them the option to open up that side of Sunset more and incorporate Sunset Ranch expansion plot in an over-arching redevelopment the way it was originaly intentioned for the Roger Rabbit section.
Agreed. It is sad that many people in this thread instead of fighting against the idea of a change are just speculating what it could be. There is no reason the ride should change.
ToT is one of the worst things Disney Anaheim did. It ruined the years they spent fixing the theme of California Adventure and ruined a great ride.
RnR is unique and I love it. Keep in mind I have no nostalgia for it as I only rode it for the first time 6 months ago. It is an awesome ride and Aerosmith is a great choice.
Considering that the Loch Ness Monster at Busch Gardens is over 40 years old, operates in a very humid part of the country with much greater extremes of weather than Orlando and shows very little signs of age, I think its a safe bet that the infrastructure of Rockn' Rollercoaster is probably in pretty good shape currently.The life span of a roller coaster is a lot longer than 20 years! Especially when said roller coaster is in an enclosed building and not exposed to the elements. There are coasters all over the country that are 40/50/60/70/80 years old. Now most of those are wooden not steel because steel coasters have not been around as long, but the lifespan and maintenance of a steel coaster is even longer than a wooden one.
I am all for Disney building more roller coasters, they don't have nearly enough, but why do it at the expense of an existing coaster??
Seems if they were going to replace worn track or wholesale replace a coaster, they'd start with Space Mountain. If it's not a safety concern, it seems cost prohibitive to demo and built new just for the heck of it.I know that the average lifespan of a steel coaster varies based on upkeep, design and lots of other factors but part of me wonders if RnRC might have a shorter lifespan due to the way in which it was constructed. I'm sure there is a way to replace worn track but is it worth the trouble? Remember RnRC was built first and then the building was built around it. This is opposite of what Disney is currently doing with GotG at EPCOT. If it is too expensive to reimagine/update I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't just rip it out and start over with something brand new. This is basically what they did with the GMR. And it would give them the option to open up that side of Sunset more and incorporate Sunset Ranch expansion plot in an over-arching redevelopment the way it was originaly intentioned for the Roger Rabbit section.
I'm still a bit puzzled by why Hulk had it's track replaced only 16 years after it opened.
I got an idea, if Disney wants to make a new land. How about a whole Haunted section with Tower of Terror, a rethemed Hearse coaster with ghosts and a new restaurant?
A retheme is one of several possibilities being contemplated at the moment. There’s quite a few different options proposed.
Like Stitch, the ride requirements would remove a large chunk of the target demographic.After seeing the new night show it popped in my head they can do a wreck it Ralph theme. Not exactly what I would like to see but just a thought.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.