• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

Disney Pulls Starbucks Mug from Epcot Shelves

JohnD

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
I'll start.

It's sensitivity run amok. The entire mug had a purple theme. The monorail stripe is purple because of the entire palette. It would be no different if the mug was B/W. A black stripe on the monorail wouldn't mean it was supposed to represent "Monorail Black." It would be a completely different matter if the mug used a full color palette. That isn't the case here.

To those who have already bought the mug, I suggest you keep it in the package and don't open it. It will be worth A LOT.
 

JohnD

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
So what color is the monorail stripe on this mug?
image.jpg
 

The Empress Lilly

Well-Known Member
Eh, why shouldn't Disney be a bit sensitive. An employee died, only 21, they decided to honour him by pulling the purple monorail. Personally I wouldn't have done it like that, but at least they are actually putting their money where their mouth is.

Incidentally, great choice of colour for EPCOT! I just might get that mug, sans coloured monorail, it looked good!
 

flynnibus

Premium Member
An angle people overlook is.. this isn't trying to scrub the EXISTENCE of purple... but simply avoid using it in promotional/merchandise.

I would agree it would be over the top if people were all upset over it - I don't think its over the top for the company to wise up and say "no a good choice" and simply change it.

Imagine the naive kid going 'wow, a purple monorail.. I wonder why they don't have one of those? Dad: They did johnny, until some kid got killed in it". Disney is an idealized world... no need to bring tragedy to the forefront.
 

mousehockey37

Well-Known Member
An angle people overlook is.. this isn't trying to scrub the EXISTENCE of purple... but simply avoid using it in promotional/merchandise.

I would agree it would be over the top if people were all upset over it - I don't think its over the top for the company to wise up and say "no a good choice" and simply change it.

Imagine the naive kid going 'wow, a purple monorail.. I wonder why they don't have one of those? Dad: They did johnny, until some kid got killed in it". Disney is an idealized world... no need to bring tragedy to the forefront.

Here I thought all of this purple nonsense was going to a gender related issue. So what's wrong with history? Yes, it's sad there was a fatal accident involving the monorails. Is that a reason to shy away from it? No.
 

tirian

Well-Known Member
I'll start.

It's sensitivity run amok. The entire mug had a purple theme. The monorail stripe is purple because of the entire palette. It would be no different if the mug was B/W. A black stripe on the monorail wouldn't mean it was supposed to represent "Monorail Black." It would be a completely different matter if the mug used a full color palette. That isn't the case here.

To those who have already bought the mug, I suggest you keep it in the package and don't open it. It will be worth A LOT.
I agree 1000% (is that possible?). It's a color scheme on a cup.
 

flynnibus

Premium Member
At the end of the day.. it's a stupid mug. Why taunt faith when the easiest thing to do is just pull it and do something else. It's not like there is some strong affinity or NEED to keep it as it was. It's a blip on the spreadsheet and Disney moves on.

The only people who will even care about it 6 days from now are those who hoard Disney merchandise.
 

mp2bill

Well-Known Member
They are drawing attention to it themselves by pulling it. Most people would have never noticed or made the connection. I know I didn't and I call myself a fan.
Streisand effect. I had no clue what the problem with monorail purple was until I read the article...
 

flynnibus

Premium Member
They are drawing attention to it themselves by pulling it. Most people would have never noticed or made the connection. I know I didn't and I call myself a fan.

Drawing attention to it in a very finite audience. Disney didn't make noise about doing it (promoting or not) - they simply did it. It's the Disney stalkers making news of it. It's just good business sense to just pull it and move forward.

Think of the alternative... they don't do it.. and later down the road someone gets their feathers riled up about it.. what's Disney to do then? Defend the choice and tell them 'get over it'? No, Disney would then have to play sympathetic then too.. and be right back in the same spot. There is ZERO upside for Disney sticking with the design.. only risk. So write-off a few grand in merchandise and get on with life.
 

Goofyernmost

Well-Known Member
Streisand effect. I had no clue what the problem with monorail purple was until I read the article...
Even if everyone knew, it is time to move on. It was tragic and the loss of a young life in an accident is awful, but, it has been treated like that was the only fatal accident that happened that entire year. The monorail is an inanimate object operated by people. The monorail regardless of the color did not cause this young mans demise, it was just as much a victim as he was. Just that we don't really care about the Monorail, rightfully so, and enough time has passed since the incident to just let it fade into an unpleasant memory.

That same year I knew someone that was killed in a car accident. The car was red. Should I now be offended every time a red car is depicted anyplace? As said, over-sensitivity concerning this event. Yes, it was a big deal, yes it was traumatic to a number of people that had never really witnessed a fatal situation, but, has been a long time since that happened, in relative terms. Not having a purple Monorail does not make everything OK now or bring the boy back. 2000 people were killed when planes ran into a couple of highrise buildings, should we now never acknowledge that highrises exist or demand that they be eliminated from our skyline? Many very good people have died in plane crashes, should we never again be exposed to airplanes? It is time to get over it. I doubt if Disney would have pulled them or had them pulled unless someone complained about it. That is a very high cost and waste of resources. Not to mention the fact that a segment of the population is now able to cash in handsomely because of a tragedy. Not much of a tribute in my opinion. Misplaced sentimentality!
 
Last edited:

kap91

Well-Known Member
I think it was a smart choice, you know in today's social media age someone would have started making a huge fuss over it, this thread and the coverage it's been getting (really Orlando sentinel? A company deciding to not sell a coffee mug is news worthy?) proves it.

Better to be on the proactive side than at the mercy of an angry facebook mob that turns it into a national headline. Cause that's never happened before.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom