My wife and I are starting to plan our next trip for this October (we're already getting excited!) and this time we're planning on going with my wife's sister and her husband - it will be the first trip for them.
DW and I stayed at Poly last time and loved it, and were planning to stay onsite again, but now my sister-in-law has mentioned that her husband's co-worker's mom apparently has a condo that we can rent when we are down there that is apparently "down the street from Disney World" (not sure where it is...) and will cost "a lot less".
DW and I would prefer to stay on-site even though it will cost more but we are trying to figure out how best to present our case. The cost isn't really an issue for either us or the in-laws.
So, what reasons can we give to a couple who has never been to WDW to justify spending more $ to stay on-site?
Thanks!
DW and I stayed at Poly last time and loved it, and were planning to stay onsite again, but now my sister-in-law has mentioned that her husband's co-worker's mom apparently has a condo that we can rent when we are down there that is apparently "down the street from Disney World" (not sure where it is...) and will cost "a lot less".
DW and I would prefer to stay on-site even though it will cost more but we are trying to figure out how best to present our case. The cost isn't really an issue for either us or the in-laws.
So, what reasons can we give to a couple who has never been to WDW to justify spending more $ to stay on-site?
Thanks!