That entire story that was told falls apart the moment you start picking at it. Like most conspiracy theories, especially the glamorous and exciting ones, it requires you to suspend rational thought and basic common sense at several key junctures in the tale.
But so many folks were so willing to want to believe it, they refused to step back for 3 seconds and think it through.
To be fair, as I've been chatting on chat boards for coming up on 30 years this summer, you could probably dig up old comments of mine from Usenet in the '97-'99 era, or Laughingplace in the '04-'08 era, etc. and see my thoughts on Eisner and Iger all evolve.
But then as rational humans talking about stuff we love, we all evolved our thoughts on those two men.
I remember being fairly opinionated in '04-'05 that it was time for Eisner to go. I was very supportive of Roy Disney's public campaign at that time. DCA 1.0 had been a horrific failure and was a huge embarrassment, and even the quick fixes thrown at it in '02-'04 were cheap downgrades (Tower of Terror, Bugs Land, MSEP, XGames, etc.). Paul Pressler was a complete disaster as Parks Chairman circa '98-'02, and Cynthia Harris's policies and operational decisions were literally killing Disneyland guests during that time.
I don't think anyone didn't want Eisner to leave by 2004.
As someone who grew up with 90s/2000s Disney I think people who complain now forget how embarrassingly bad the new offerings were. Disneyland was not building out E tickets each year like now.
I remember the mid 2000s when the new ride openings were Winnie the Pooh, Monsters Inc, and Buzz Lightyear Astro blasters, culminating in a bad Nemo submarine redo.
I still think from a customer service perspective the parks were ran much better in those years but definitely not when it came to rides/maintenance as we all know.
Even though I don't like the movie property direction post Iger, by the end of his run Michael Eisner was literally throwing carnival rides into the former Disneyland parking lot and calling it a themepark.
My thoughts on Iger evolved similarly through the 2010's. By the time he chose Chapek to lead the Parks in 2015, I was quickly souring on being an Iger fan. That wasn't anything unique to me, I think the majority of us Parks fans felt the same way and our opinions and thoughts changed a lot in the late 2010's.
And to your point, a lot of my opinion was definitely shaped by the bitchy Al Lutz commentary of that era. Classic laughs!
The 60th was such a glorious time for Disneyland with the new parade, redone Alice, Matterhorn, and Peterpan rides.
I think the Mission Breakout announcement was when my opinion on WDI and Iger started to shift. By the time they did the Pixar Pier announcement any cohesion done by the 2010 redo of California Adventure was well on the way out.
Then in the movie realm he went all in on CGI remakes and milking Star Wars, Pixar, and Marvel to the point they are practically worthless shells of what they used to be.
Seems Iger's legacy was to ruin all the major acquisitions he was applauded for getting in the first place.
Iger very much was seen as a business genius basically until his return as CEO. I know everyone on this site and Micechat were all impressed with him when he took over from Eisner.
While he never reached the same lows as Eisner's DCA he has made some really confusing and terrible choices.