Believe it or not it’s not exactly size that matters. On paper HKDL has more “attractions”So if I had to pick between Hong Kong or Shanghai (for Disney purposes), which should I choose?
Believe it or not it’s not exactly size that matters. On paper HKDL has more “attractions”So if I had to pick between Hong Kong or Shanghai (for Disney purposes), which should I choose?
Everything is better themed at Shanghai. The attention to detail at HKDL's OG land's is lackingBelieve it or not it’s not exactly size that matters. On paper HKDL has more “attractions”
Didn’t say it isn’tEverything is better themed at Shanghai. The attention to detail at HKDL's OG land's is lacking
Yes and no IMO.Everything is better themed at Shanghai. The attention to detail at HKDL's OG land's is lacking
With Frozen maybe. Otherwise it’s too small even with Small World.Yes and no IMO.
The best of Shanghai is better than the best of Hong Kong.
But when Shanghai's bad, it's worse than anything at Hong Kong Disneyland.
And that's with the acknowledgment that Hong Kong's original areas are a bit half-formed. Even with that being the case, I'd still make the case that, say, HKDL's Fantasyland is a considerably better environment over the Shanghai version.
That’s because of its minuscule budget. I’d argue Grizzly Peak and the Mystic complex hold their own against any other park.Even on Main Street you notice it lacks detail versus Mickey Avenue/Gardens of Imagination.
Totally agree! Same with Frozen. Though the queue for Runaway Minecars leaves a little to be desired.That’s because of its minuscule budget. I’d argue Grizzly Peak and the Mystic complex hold their own against any other park.
I've only visited pre-Frozen, but I'd still give HKDL the win in Fantasyland over Shanghai at the very least.With Frozen maybe. Otherwise it’s too small even with Small World.
I think HKDL’s Disneyland biggest issue is Tomorrowland honestly, and despite them throwing 3 Marvel rides at it it basically is still the same land, unlike their other wonderful expansions. I even really liked Toy Story Land with the lush Hong Kong landscape, felt it was more intimate in a good way over Shanghai.
Even on Main Street you notice it lacks detail versus Mickey Avenue/Gardens of Imagination.
Grizzly is one of Disney's greatest coasters, so much fun. Simply one of their best rides anywhere. And its surroundings area is also superb, great placemaking.That’s because of its minuscule budget. I’d argue Grizzly Peak and the Mystic complex hold their own against any other park.
When did you visit Shanghai? I went with opening and got back for a second visit last year. Fantasylands vibe changed massively due to the now grown trees. Makes the land feel much more intimate and magical.Yes and no IMO.
The best of Shanghai is better than the best of Hong Kong.
But when Shanghai's bad, it's worse than anything at Hong Kong Disneyland.
And that's with the acknowledgment that Hong Kong's original areas are a bit half-formed. Even with that being the case, I'd still make the case that, say, HKDL's Fantasyland is a considerably better environment over the Shanghai version.
2019.When did you visit Shanghai? I went with opening and got back for a second visit last year. Fantasylands vibe changed massively due to the now grown trees. Makes the land feel much more intimate and magical.
Agreed 100%. Even with the trees there's still large sections of the land that have wooden fences as the only thing going on visually. The flaw is having the Crystal Grotto attraction in the middle of the land and yet deciding to not have it be visible.2019.
I'm sure that the tree growth will help, but I just didn't find the land to my taste, nor did I feel it bettered the approach of any previous Fantasyland.
The only thing it really had going for it was the updated Peter Pan IMO.



Is that fence where the Grotto attraction is?Agreed 100%. Even with the trees there's still large sections of the land that have wooden fences as the only thing going on visually. The flaw is having the Crystal Grotto attraction in the middle of the land and yet deciding to not have it be visible.
View attachment 907601View attachment 907602View attachment 907603
I hope they replace the ride. Genuinely just an awful downgrade from Small World; it's basically a prime expansion plotIs that fence where the Grotto attraction is?
Oh, it’s fun. Even a cartoon jungle cruise.I hope they replace the ride. Genuinely just an awful downgrade from Small World; it's basically a prime expansion plot
I think this one is between Fantasyland and Toy Story across from Pan, but they're everywhere so it's hard to keep track. The area directly behind is worse, with unthemed tents and picnic tables. The last pic here is definitely behind the grotto because you can see the castle.Is that fence where the Grotto attraction is?



Agreed 100%. Even with the trees there's still large sections of the land that have wooden fences as the only thing going on visually. The flaw is having the Crystal Grotto attraction in the middle of the land and yet deciding to not have it be visible.
View attachment 907601View attachment 907602View attachment 907603
I don’t disagree but I honestly feel like long-term plans, maybe by the park’s 25th they should have a replacement, particularly if the rate of expansions don’t slow too much with a second park.Yes I’m 90% sure this is TSPL that is the issue, not really Fantasyland proper. Not Crystal Grotto.
The empty expansion pad(s) are the problem, but not really Fantasyland proper in my opinion. The counter clockwise loop from Pan to Pooh is quite nice and I really like how well the 100 acre woods has grown in.
View attachment 907697
What it needs is expansion into the picnic area and north.
Perhaps more than any other rideI hope they replace the ride. Genuinely just an awful downgrade from Small World; it's basically a prime expansion plot
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.