Brer Panther
Well-Known Member
The Africa land has an enormous safari and a walking trail where you can see animals. Plus a show featuring characters from a movie about animals (which was originally in another area of the park anyway).A park with an Asia and Africa land is adding a Central/South America land. I’m just not that offended.
Asia has a walking trail where you can see animals. And a bird show (is that still there?).
A South America land would be a great fit for Animal Kingdom if done right. You could have some sort of Amazon River cruise with animals (either real or animatronic), a walking trail where you can see animals, maybe something Rio or a show hosted by Antonio (ONLY Antonio - no Mirabel, no Bruno, no Luisa, etc.) or Kronk showcasing real animals if you MUST get an IP in there.
Instead, they're removing dinosaurs from the park entirely so they can shove in two franchises that are about people, not animals, and no real animals at all.
Why is this so hard to understand?
The only ride I can think of is Kali River Rapids (maaaaaaaaybe the Avatar rides, too?), and I wouldn't complain if they replaced it... provided the attraction they were replacing it with actually fit the park. If they replaced it with a Moana land or a Mulan attraction, I'd complain because those IPs don't belong in Animal Kingdom either.The park has had rides that aren’t really about animals for a long time.