I thought Dinosaur itself had a lot of quality. It was the right amount of 90s-2000s corniness and quality theming. I don't think anyone will disagree with the quality of the overall land, but Dinosaur was one of the bright spotsDinosaur was a horrifically bad ride (loud, CORNEY, stupid plot) in a horrifically bad and cheap land. This was a public service announcement. We will now return to our regularly scheduled programming
Dinosaur was one of the best rides WDW had.Dinosaur was a horrifically bad ride (loud, CORNEY, stupid plot) in a horrifically bad and cheap land. This was a public service announcement. We will now return to our regularly scheduled programming
No new animal exhibits are coming with Tropical Americas, partly due to proximity of the land to the Parking Lot, and partly due to budgetHas there been nay news/rumours about the possibility of getting any living animals in Tropical Americas?
You can’t be serious.Dinosaur was one of the best rides WDW had.
The land itself was also one of the best lands Disney had.
question, what's the preexisting grey building behind the Nemo theater for? just curious, as ive been wondering is TA is a success if they would in the far future possibly tear down Nemo to expand the land (fingers crossed for Up or emperors new groove)
I'm absolutely serious.You can’t be serious.
No. They're footers for a monorail expansion.Pavement samples are also arrayed above.
Weather testing, perhaps?So ... didn't see this one posted, but I found it quite interesting.
View attachment 903245
If you zoom in on the left side, you can see material samples, which have shown up in flights past. They include what look like mockups of the finishes for the entrance arch, the temple exterior, the artificial trees that will flank the temple, the mountains that will conceal the Encanto show building, and more. Pavement samples are also arrayed above.
View attachment 903246
What's new is on the right side of the image, where it looks like they're actually assembling some full-scale facade elements to drop into place later (though someone can correct me on that if I'm way off base). Hard to tell exactly what they are since we're looking at the reverse side of most of it. Perhaps they're levels of the tiered temple facade?
View attachment 903247
The samples on the left are definitely out there for that, yes. They've been on site since before the land even closed. The items on the right are what's new and appear to be show-scale elements being prepped for future installation.Weather testing, perhaps?
DINOSAUR wasn’t bad at all, but chester and hester made up half the area. Restaurantosaurus was a glorified fast food place and the boneyard looked nice but was mostly meant for young kids so i never bothered to go. The land as a whole is no loss.Dinosaur was one of the best rides WDW had.
The land itself was also one of the best lands Disney had.
Losing Chester and Hester means WDW lost its worst area.DINOSAUR wasn’t bad at all, but chester and hester made up half the area. Restaurantosaurus was a glorified fast food place and the boneyard looked nice but was mostly meant for young kids so i never bothered to go. The land as a whole is no loss.
I agree though I wouldn't have gotten rid of the rest of Dinoland with it.Losing Chester and Hester means WDW lost its worst area.
Losing Launch bay means it lost its second worst area at the same time.Losing Chester and Hester means WDW lost its worst area.
Infrastructure for the boats/floats of the river/night time show.question, what's the preexisting grey building behind the Nemo theater for? just curious, as ive been wondering is TA is a success if they would in the far future possibly tear down Nemo to expand the land (fingers crossed for Up or emperors new groove)
I’ve not casually seen this but haven’t been lurking lately.Why is it so hard for people to assimilate basic information that has been shared about the ride's premise?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.