Or is this actually a start to convert Planet Watch into an Oceania themed land?
Or is this actually a start to convert Planet Watch into an Oceania themed land?
Barbie's Epcot show, oddly enough, was a smash hit with one very particular demographic - teenage boys and men (of any age). Why? During the number of rewrites, the show really wasn't working well in the eyes of certain entertainment executives. Some 50+ different versions of the show existed - 30 or so of them during the revision process between when the show had its first performance and a month later when it officially premiered the version much more commonly known. Lines, segments, costumes, entire songs, were added and deleted with regularity. One executive grew so bored with the show he suggested that a swimsuit segment be added - surely he'd stay awake then (and so would, naturally, the brothers and fathers of the girls who were the intended audience)?Don’t forget Barbie at Epcot
As long as it's the cute and cuddly kind, I'm all for it. Spiders? Drop bears? Snakes? No thank you!No one's excited for Australian wildlife accompanying the Bluey M&G?
Longest line of the day was Kilimanjaro Safari which was maybe 45-60 minutes. Started around 10.30am and did - Kilimanjaro Safari, Gorilla Falls trail, Wildlife Express and a quick look around planet watch (we mis-timed it for the drawing class), lunch at Flame Tree BBQ, Nemo Musical, Tiger trail, Bird Flight show, ice cream, Avatar flight of passage, Avatar boat ride, Zootopia, Dinosaur, Everest x2 and a final go on flight of passage. Left the park at 8pm to go and eat at Jiko. Also did a couple of photopass stops.Not trying to be snarky but how long were you waiting in lines? AK is definitely not a full day park. I dont think many people will say it is…. Listen yea i guess if you choose to walk and stop and see everything in detail stop in every store etc…. But the park is far from a full day.
Just what we frickin' need -- it's not bad enough that crime in Florida is pervasive and rising, that people have forgotten how (or never learned how) to drive, and the developers are actively trying to pave every inch of open land, but now Disney wants to import a bunch of creatures (as if the boa constrictors and green iguanas* aren't bad enough) from AUSTRALIA, of all places, where EVERYTHING wants to KILL YOU!!!Grab the whole family and snap some pictures alongside your Blue Heeler pals to remember this one-of-a-kind adventure. Plus, as part of your wild excursion, step outside to discover an experience with animals native to Bluey’s home country of Australia!![]()
Walt Disney World in 2026: Events, Fun and More
Discover new attractions and experiences, nine festivals and special events, when you visit Walt Disney World in 2026.disneyparksblog.com
I like how we use the "kids are so smart and they love Disney stuff without the characters!" as some sort of shield when its obviously more complicated than that. Look at stuff liek Maelstrom vs Frozen, one has 3x the line the other has, every single day... I wonder..?That’s a lazy argument and wrongly assumes children will only being interested in attractions related to know Disney characters. Like they don’t have the creative capacity to see beyond that.
And, again, even if Disney does work with an existing known and popular entity, which isn’t a bad thing in itself, at least do a good job with those attractions. Tell a story. Make it interesting. But nah, we settle for shallow nonsense that gets us noise like that horrible zootopia attraction. This is just more of that. As I said, they are appealing to Disney adults with no standards. As long as it’s Disney. Who cares.
Because it is Frozen. Even though the attraction is garbage (with one or two good moments here are there), people eat it up. You are proving my point. There is no incentive to do anything great because "look! its Elsa!" is good enough to many people now.Maelstrom vs Frozen, one has 3x the line the other has, every single day... I wonder..?
Fine....then make them good. As I said at the very beginning, Disney is very good at turning something very popular into an underwhelming park experience.So clearly, kids DO prefer Disney characters in their attractions
More proves your own point wrong right? You said "That’s a lazy argument and wrongly assumes children will only being interested in attractions related to know Disney characters. Like they don’t have the creative capacity to see beyond that."Because it is Frozen. Even though the attraction is garbage (with one or two good moments here are there), people eat it up. You are proving my point. There is no incentive to do anything great because "look! its Elsa!" is good enough to many people now.
Fine....then make them good. As I said at the very beginning, Disney is very good at turning something very popular into an underwhelming park experience.
More proves your own point wrong right? You said "That’s a lazy argument and wrongly assumes children will only being interested in attractions related to know Disney characters. Like they don’t have the creative capacity to see beyond that."
You said that kids know better but then they absolutely love a ride filled with Disney characters and now its "well of course they will! It has a popular Disney character!"
Those two statements are at odds with each other
I hope you continue to enjoy the uninspired attractions though. Thanks for cheering on the downfall of WDW.That’s a lazy argument and wrongly assumes children will only being interested in attractions related to know Disney characters. Like they don’t have the creative capacity to see beyond that.
The old attraction was a few mannequins, a three headed troll, and a big finale plunging into an oil rig. Hardly a work of art.Because it is Frozen. Even though the attraction is garbage (with one or two good moments here are there), people eat it up. You are proving my point. There is no incentive to do anything great because "look! its Elsa!" is good enough to many people now.
Agreed it doesn't sound like much, but, ....I mean,...... yes, in retrospect it seems that anything else would have been a better idea than a rig????The old attraction was a few mannequins, a three headed troll, and a big finale plunging into an oil rig. Hardly a work of art.
The present being a Norwegian cruise ad followed by an 80s film?Agreed it doesn't sound like much, but, ....I mean,...... yes, in retrospect it seems that anything else would have been a better idea than a rig????
But the thrill came (far more than the fall) from feeling that you just returned from the distant past back into the present.
So if one to were concede that point (which I personally don’t but that doesn’t really matter), they replaced it with something worse that doesn’t fit the pavilion? Their most popular princess, they decide to build something for her, and she gets an underwhelming attraction. So not only do they put something in the pavilion that didn’t belong, they put something that just isn’t that good. SMH. Still going on today. Sad.The old attraction was a few mannequins, a three headed troll, and a big finale plunging into an oil rig. Hardly a work of art.
A worse fit perhaps, but a better ride in general with better AAs and more comprehensible storyline.So if one to were concede that point (which I personally don’t but that doesn’t really matter), they replaced it with something worse that doesn’t fit the pavilion? Their most popular princess, they decide to build something for her, and she gets an underwhelming attraction. So not only do they put something in the pavilion that didn’t belong, they put something that just isn’t that good. SMH. Still going on today. Sad.
If people want to settle for crap, that’s fine. Disney likes it. The new Disney Difference. “I can see Elsa. I can see Nick Wilde. I can see bluey.” That’s what matters now. Quality be damned.A worse fit perhaps, but a better ride in general with better AAs and more comprehensible storyline.
The company has been going in the direction that you call crap for several years now.If people want to settle for crap, that’s fine. Disney likes it. The new Disney Difference. “I can see Elsa. I can see Nick Wilde. I can see bluey.” That’s what matters now. Quality be damned.
No. Not as long as people like the Disney adults keep pumping in money.The company has been going in the direction that you call crap for several years now.
Do you think it’s going to change?
I wouldn’t limit it to Disney adults but people with different preferences than you are spending a lot of money at WDW.No. Not as long as people like the Disney adults keep pumping in money.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.