What you call soulless Disney calls money in the bank.
View attachment 913144
So if your only addition to this is to try and compare this to Lilo and Stitch, then I think the movie will do fine. Sometimes a movie can just be a movie for fun, doesn't have to be groundbreaking or "art".
I think it has appeal like Lilo and Stitch, Moana is very popular, that doesn’t mean I don’t think a remake done right wouldn’t make hundreds of millions more.
And Lilo and Stitch making that much is literally just a testament to solid marketing and banking on a beloved character that has been slept on for 20+ years. I could’ve told you that Lion King, Aladdin, Beauty and the Beast, and Lilo and Stitch were billion dollar movies.
Snow White or say Cinderella never could achieve that even if they were masterpieces, tho Cinderella despite being by the numbers and unoriginal like Stitch remake, instead was beautifully shot, perfectly cast, had insane costumes and art direction, all totally absent from Lilo, but it is an average type remake, “safe.”
I could’ve also told you Snow White was going to flop when I first saw the 7 bandits leak LMAO.
Moana I felt was going to do upwards of How to Train Your Dragon, but that was actually a well put together movie, safe like Lilo and stitch, but also better made still.
Moana legitimately looks like a clusterf*** and I sincerely hope parents won’t blow money on this movie, I doubt it’ll be a 1/10 like Snow White or Rise of Skywalker, but idk, 5, like average, looks optimistic. Aladdin had problems, and was truly lacking heart, but it did *some* things right too, where as I don’t know, will there be a single improvement over the original Moana? I actually doubt it, and it’ll be compared so closely with the 2016 movie. I mean you see the reactions of Tangled over Moana, both relatively the same era, but totally different.
I haven’t put enough thought and we’re too far out to know for sure (Snow White was an automatic flop for me like Project Haul Mary was always going to be a success, I mean you could tell the quality difference and the team attached behind it, stars, production design and craftsmanship), but Moana and Mando both are like the embodiment of Disney’s problem.
I think the public’s back is starting to break though with how much they’re willing to tolerate.
Lilo and Stitch wasn’t a train wreck, but will it inspire people to see its sequel being that it was mid and totally lacking heart like the original. Kind of reminds me of Maleficent: Mistress of Evil or Alice Through the Looking Glass. The bankability of the IP and marketing of it only goes so far. When people taste a bad burger they stop eating, and the same quality issues have indeed hurt Disney’s numbers on many films.
I guarantee you if TRON: Ares was a true Legacy sequel with Ryan Gosling as a star and had the Spider-Verse writers attached it would’ve made a profit. Guarantee it like I’d put money in it.
Not every franchise would operate this way, but it’s like would Dark Knight Rises have made more than Dark Knight if it sucked? Absolutely not.
You seem to ignore, consistently, Disney’s just awful output generally, and the totally lacking heart remakes and sequels they pump out.
You occasionally get a gem like Guardians 3, but it feels almost every time like, “wow, we’re lucky Disney let us have this cut.”
Maybe there’ll be a viral TikTok trend to boycott this movie to get Disney to stop the cash grabs, I’m hoping everyday.
People rejected with their wallets 1/10s in Snow White, slop after slop of mid marvel movie from The Marvels to Quantumania to Brave New World, and it’s beautiful to see.
The cultural tide has changed if you can sense it.
People do want high quality movies.
Disney only hurts themselves and their brand by not trying.
It’s like, release a Hunchback of Notre Dame PG-1r movie that follows more so the off-Broadway approach, and adapt it entirely new for live action. Same plots characters, but added depth. Hire an elite writer that has made a banger before. Maybe a second one and see who writes a better plot independently.
I genuinely feel like the CEO needs to start reading the scripts to some degree.
Like if you’re the Disney CEO, it’s your life, you’re not going to have a 40-hour work week. You live eat and breathe Disney, and you do what it takes. It’s totally a writing room problem and Disney’s corporate HR meddling in everything.
Iger’s mantra that has milked Disney of “just make it cuz they’ll come and they’re peasants that will eat anything we put out” has been proven spectacularly wrong, as have other studios that have been doing the same.
And it’s like, when you make a trilogy like Star Wars, hire someone competent like Dune got. It’s instant money when you pair talent with popular franchises. Instant money. Anytime you don’t try you’re leaving money on the table. It literally makes no sense, you could keep the heart and shoot Lilo and Stitch well you’re already spending millions, it’s just pure laziness, like totally on management and no one else.
Ya know?
The fact Disney has been messing up the basics while coasting on the most valuable IP library of any company by far is profoundly mind blowing.