• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

DAK “Zootopia” is being created for the Tree of Life theater

HMF

Well-Known Member
Still anchors NFL in Florida.. doesn't sit empty.. still attracts thousands of riders.. still can push out long LL return times.. still can avg nearly 30min waits for a omnimover.. still anchors a top princess in the park. What more do you want?

At DCA the waits can be even more.. I know.. I was stuck in 'em!
That is mostly because it was one of the few actual attractions that came with "New Fantasyland"
 

James Alucobond

Well-Known Member
Moana doesn't belong in Animal Kingdom.
As presented in the film, we know. Neither did the story in the film A Bug's Life, neither do the narratives of Lion King and Pocahontas aside from one song apiece, neither do Encanto and Indiana Jones, etc. However, as there is no point right now in speculating about IP-free attractions, it's more realistic to hope for lands where the available IP options are either generally appropriate or at least superficially inoffensive and capable of being manipulated toward thematic cohesion.
 

HMF

Well-Known Member
Anecdotally, Little Mermaid at DCA has made zero impression on my family and they must be reminded each visit that the attraction exists. Then there's a few minutes discussing if it's worth walking over there for it.
It is quite fascinating how much of DCA's real estate the Mermaid show building takes up considering its quality.
 

HMF

Well-Known Member
what they slapped down in Epcot for Moana was a better fit for AK. A friend I took recently even said this looks like it should have been at AK instead and shes no Epcot purist......but back to zoomess, zoomiss,,,
It doesn't really fit either, but AK would be less objectionable.
 

flynnibus

Premium Member
That says more about Disney's reluctance to invest in World Showcase than it does about Maelstrom.
It wasn't a matter of invest - it was a matter of design. Even if the japan ride happened, it would have been largely the same issue. WS is a ride desert.. and at the time EPCOT as a whole really lacked any thrill elements. Disney really hammed up Malestrom as this attraction with this thrill element.. and really was such a small piece of it, it came across as way over selling and under delivering. The fact the elements like the dry film at the end were so boring for many really contributed to it all as well. The attraction was weak compared to it's contemporaries elsewhere.

That is mostly because it was one of the few actual attractions that came with "New Fantasyland"
A point that would have mattered when new... not a generation later like we are talking about now. That was literally 13 years ago now.. it's ride appeal is no longer "hey, lets go check out the new FL ride!".
 

UNCgolf

Well-Known Member
A point that would have mattered when new... not a generation later like we are talking about now. That was literally 13 years ago now.. it's ride appeal is no longer "hey, lets go check out the new FL ride!".

I just Googled Magic Kingdom average wait times and the Little Mermaid is near the very bottom; on average it has one of the lowest wait times in the park. This is obviously anecdotal, but the last two times I was there it was a legitimate walk-on -- we just strolled through the queue and boarded without ever stopping.

I wonder what the data @lentesta has would show, though.
 

flynnibus

Premium Member
I just Googled Magic Kingdom average wait times and the Little Mermaid is near the very bottom; on average it has one of the lowest wait times in the park. This is obviously anecdotal, but the last two times I was there it was a legitimate walk-on -- we just strolled through the queue and boarded without ever stopping.

I wonder what the data @lentesta has would show, though.
The graphs posted already speak to the data on longer terms and you can compare. https://www.thrill-data.com/waits/attraction/magic-kingdom/undertheseajourneyofthelittlemermaid/ if you aren't familiar with the site.
 

UNCgolf

Well-Known Member
The graphs posted already speak to the data on longer terms and you can compare. https://www.thrill-data.com/waits/attraction/magic-kingdom/undertheseajourneyofthelittlemermaid/ if you aren't familiar with the site.


They have data since the Little Mermaid opened and have it as consistently near the bottom of all rides at the Magic Kingdom. A 15-20 minute posted wait generally means the ride is a walk-on (it was posted at 20 minutes both times we walked straight through the queue and boarded).

I doubt Disney considers it a major success considering how much money they spent on it, especially with how much more money they spent to try to improve it.
 

WondersOfLife

Blink, blink. Breathe, breathe. Day in, day out.
I hate to be the one to admit it, guys... But average, normal people in the world truly dont appreciate originality, art, and effort anymore. Most people really do have the mindsets of "I know dat movie! Woo!" and "This ride goes zoom zoom fast! Best ride ever!"

And there is no sense in continuing the unending argument with these people... Which, again (sadly), make up the majority of the average human population, and the average tourist that visits Disney World.

And this is a message I have stated since I was 13 years old on these threads (im 27 now). But I feel like that message is more important now than ever.

On the flip side, to the annoying folks who keep replying with "YoU jUSt cAnT aCCepT ChAnGe!!!" ....We come here to complain about what we lost because it is near impossible to find that many likeminded people in the real world that give a s***. It is nice to be able to vent somewhere about what was, what could have been, and what could be but wont happen.

Someone here said recently that there is a difference between "Disney Adults" and "Theme Park Enthusiasts" and I 100% agree. I wish the average Disney Adult Pixie Duster would just stay in those Facebook groups tho instead of taking over the forums and threads here that just enjoy discrediting intellectual discussions with "New is always better. You're stupid for thinking old was better" posts all the time.

Two very different types of fandoms are just increasingly getting more tense because Disney truly is changing in favor for the generic fandom. And I wish that generic fandom would just stay on Facebook. Because the theme park enthusiasts need a place to escape from you guys. We dont have a large community. Let us have our rants. 😂
 

WondersOfLife

Blink, blink. Breathe, breathe. Day in, day out.
Yeah I’d be curious to see how a well done, modern non-IP ride did. The last one that comes to mind is Expedition Everest.
Test Track 3.0 can essentially be considered a re-skin of an old ride and is an improvement of the original instead of a downgrade. It proves that OG Epcot principles could still work if they just....... Tried.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom