mickEblu
Well-Known Member
Because the story takes place on land and UNDER the sea?![]()
Well tell Tony Baxter that.
Because the story takes place on land and UNDER the sea?![]()
Up doesn't really fit as they travel to South America, not the California Redwoods. Maybe if you wanted to do an Up overlay to Soarin' where Carl takes us around to see the world, but that doesn't sound worth the trouble to me.While true, I feel an outdoor wild mouse coaster would greatly diminish the atmosphere in that part of the park. My vote would be to keep Redwood Creek or keep it until you absolutely need that land and use it for something like a suspended Up D ticket or combine it with Mermaids space for something grander. Up makes a lot of sense at Grizzly Peak and DCA in general. Would be a very welcome addition to the park. In a way, I’m glad they didn’t go with Coco as a suspended ride which would have made for sense for the IP as if we’re going to get any new suspended dark ride in general UP is the obvious choice.
Up doesn't really fit as they travel to South America, not the California Redwoods. Maybe if you wanted to do an Up overlay to Soarin' where Carl takes us around to see the world, but that doesn't sound worth the trouble to me.
Not sure how Up would fit at all unless they ditched the premise of the film and just made a random ride about the Wilderness Explorers, but that sounds way too deep cut for an attraction beyond a play area.
I get what you're saying, the area is beautiful, but yes I meant transportive to another time/place or other worldly or something uniquely owned by Disney (essentially nearly all of DCA started out "public domain" and replicating things within a few hundred miles). And I share your opinions on Avenger's Campus and have posted quite a bit about that underwhelming office park aesthetic (I photoshopped a Boeing logo on Infinity Defense, probably in this thread up above, to make the point it belongs in any office park!)You are one of my favorite new posters here Dr. Starlander but I'm going to have to disagree that the Grand Californian (and I assume by extension Grizzly Peak?) is not transportive. You are transported to a National park. Thats not something people see every day (or ever) and it's very immersive. Like 360 immersive. And it's beautiful full of trees and has rushing water. I believe it (and by extension the Grand Californian) is one of the most transportive lands in the resort actually. Much more than something like Avengers campus. That business park/ college campus or whatever that is supposed to be is uninspired and imagery we see everyday. Maybe you mean to say transportive to another to another time/ place? Or other worldly?
I get what you're saying, the area is beautiful, but yes I meant transportive to another time/place or other worldly or something uniquely owned by Disney (essentially nearly all of DCA started out "public domain" and replicating things within a few hundred miles). And I share your opinions on Avenger's Campus and have posted quite a bit about that underwhelming office park aesthetic (I photoshopped a Boeing logo on Infinity Defense, probably in this thread up above, to make the point it belongs in any office park!)
If you like Grand Californian's arts and crafts aesthetic and you want the no-crowds (although less "grand") version, when we go to San Diego we sometimes stay at the Lodge at Torrey Pines and it's pretty cool.
View attachment 886196View attachment 886197
Still not sure why we would be flying to South America and Paradise Falls in California. Maybe an Up darkride in Pixar Pier as it's a California seaside carnival using Pixar IPs. Not sure if PP has the room for another attraction though.
Soarin' isn't a narrative, it's like an evolution of circle vision. And you would soar over California.What’s the difference between this and Soarin? You’re taking off from Grizzly Peak/ California and flying to Paradise Falls.
Except for when you soar over the world....Soarin' isn't a narrative, it's like an evolution of circle vision. And you would soar over California.
An Up ride would be tied to the narrative of an old man who flew his house to South America. Kevin and Doug are big characters and tied to that Paradise Falls narrative.
That looks like they've used up all usable space back there. Even if they knock down all the operations building behind it I don't believe there is enough space for anything else, especially not a coaster. Sorry @DrStarlander
You're probably not surprised, but I remain undeterred, haha. I think there's 75,000 to over 150,000 sq. ft. of available space to the east of the tower (conceding some systems/utilities adjacent to the tower may need to be relocated) and north if using the Hyperion space. This backstage space is almost entirely redundant road surface. I know we may disagree about what is exactly required as part of setbacks and buffers, but I'm confident they can make it work, and I'm confident they need to in the next 10 to 15 years, before going across Disneyland Drive.That looks like they've used up all usable space back there. Even if they knock down all the operations building behind it I don't believe there is enough space for anything else, especially not a coaster. Sorry @DrStarlander
Soarin' isn't a narrative, it's like an evolution of circle vision. And you would soar over California.
An Up ride would be tied to the narrative of an old man who flew his house to South America. Kevin and Doug are big characters and tied to that Paradise Falls narrative.
Ok, well as long as you understand this may not actually come to be, and that this isn't the Imagineering forum where you blue sky ideas you would do if you were in charge.You're probably not surprised, but I remain undeterred, haha. I think there's 75,000 to over 150,000 sq. ft. of available space to the east of the tower (conceding some systems/utilities adjacent to the tower may need to be relocated) and north if using the Hyperion space. This backstage space is almost entirely redundant road surface. I know we may disagree about what is exactly required as part of setbacks and buffers, but I'm confident they can make it work, and I'm confident they need to in the next 10 to 15 years, before going across Disneyland Drive.
I'm connecting this show building to the existing Avengers building (where the trolley doors are) because I think they could be leaving this spot for the entrance (Indy style) for such an attraction based on how that facade (a prime location) is depicted as dark and abandoned in the Avengers expansion aerial concept art. This the most tenuous aspect of my speculation, but we'll know more in months as they fill out Infinity Defense as we see how wide of berth -- if any -- is left back there. To me, there is no way this facade is just filler/spacer, with no plans.
And to be clear, I can't even ride coasters due to my back. There is no self-interest/wishful thinking on my part. I am putting on my "If I was in charge of DLR and my boss says get DCA's attendance up to 13 million" hat, what do I do? The words "Spider-Man Coaster" are the simplest, most guaranteed answer (besides "Frozen Land"). Whether you are age 6 or age 96, you "get it." It would perhaps be the most easily explained and marketed E-ticket attraction in the history of US theme parks (other than "Star Wars Coaster").
View attachment 886633
View attachment 886627
View attachment 886628
So then Disney will start knocking down existing stuff instead?Don't worry. Once the DisneyForward plots open up, DLR will have the blessing of size!!
You're probably not surprised, but I remain undeterred, haha. I think there's 75,000 to over 150,000 sq. ft. of available space to the east of the tower (conceding some systems/utilities adjacent to the tower may need to be relocated) and north if using the Hyperion space. This backstage space is almost entirely redundant road surface. I know we may disagree about what is exactly required as part of setbacks and buffers, but I'm confident they can make it work, and I'm confident they need to in the next 10 to 15 years, before going across Disneyland Drive.
I'm connecting this show building to the existing Avengers building (where the trolley doors are) because I think they could be leaving this spot for the entrance (Indy style) for such an attraction based on how that facade (a prime location) is depicted as dark and abandoned in the Avengers expansion aerial concept art. This the most tenuous aspect of my speculation, but we'll know more in months as they fill out Infinity Defense as we see how wide of berth -- if any -- is left back there. To me, there is no way this facade is just filler/spacer, with no plans.
And to be clear, I can't even ride coasters due to my back. There is no self-interest/wishful thinking on my part. I am putting on my "If I was in charge of DLR and my boss says get DCA's attendance up to 13 million" hat, what do I do? The words "Spider-Man Coaster" are the simplest, most guaranteed answer (besides "Frozen Land"). Whether you are age 6 or age 96, you "get it." It would perhaps be the most easily explained and marketed E-ticket attraction in the history of US theme parks (other than "Star Wars Coaster").
View attachment 886633
View attachment 886627
View attachment 886628
"As long as you understand"? Or else what? Why do you care what I "understand" or not?Ok, well as long as you understand this may not actually come to be, and that this isn't the Imagineering forum where you blue sky ideas you would do if you were in charge.
Someone posted construction photos and you brought up attraction expansion and tagged me....then you're going to call me out for being off topic? Your commitment to conflict is ridiculousEven if they knock down all the operations building behind it I don't believe there is enough space for anything else, especially not a coaster. Sorry @DrStarlander
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.