DHS What should they do with Animation Courtyard?

flynnibus

Premium Member
So let me get this straight, They spent the last 10 years trying to undo the studio concept by removing The Great Movie Ride for Runaway Railway, The backlot tour, The Pixar Studios area, added the cheap and tacky Toy Story Land and Galaxys Edge. we are losing MuppetVision for an entire Monsters Inc. Land and now for Animation Courtyard they are actually leaning back into the studio concept? They really have no long term plan on how to make this park cohesive, do they?
To have a area/hub/land of this setting is not really a conflict nor a flip flop from the changes you outlined. It's not claiming the place is a working studio or a return to a fake studio.

Also, if they are not bringing back the actual animation studio this will basically be a glorified exhibit just like it was before Launch Bay.
I don't think they are promoting it as anything more than that... a look into how it's made. Just like we don't pretend One Man's Dream was really where Walt used to work...
 

flyerjab

Well-Known Member
Yes. And my assumption is still that AC is the center of whatever DHS Phase 2 will be as part of this 10-year plan.
Hey @lentesta , any thoughts on if the Indy/Star Tours/Backlot area is being considered for Phase 2? Especially if this AC refurb ends up being unexpectedly and overly popular? Aside from the typical detractors on these forums I have the feeling that the normy crowd is going to eat this up as an offering.
 

lentesta

Premium Member
Hey @lentesta , any thoughts on if the Indy/Star Tours/Backlot area is being considered for Phase 2? Especially if this AC refurb ends up being unexpectedly and overly popular? Aside from the typical detractors on these forums I have the feeling that the normy crowd is going to eat this up as an offering.

I've heard nothing at all about those areas being affected. Doesn't mean it won't happen.

Launch Bay's operational hourly capacity might as well be zero, so closing it affects no guests or park ops.

There would have to be a pretty compelling idea to replace something like Indy, which is 2,100+ seats per performance I think.
 

Streetway Again

Well-Known Member
I've heard nothing at all about those areas being affected. Doesn't mean it won't happen.

Launch Bay's operational hourly capacity might as well be zero, so closing it affects no guests or park ops.

There would have to be a pretty compelling idea to replace something like Indy, which is 2,100+ seats per performance I think.
Star Tours finds away to escape again, like always.
 

AidenRodriguez731

Well-Known Member
I've heard nothing at all about those areas being affected. Doesn't mean it won't happen.

Launch Bay's operational hourly capacity might as well be zero, so closing it affects no guests or park ops.

There would have to be a pretty compelling idea to replace something like Indy, which is 2,100+ seats per performance I think.
It's a huge amount of space though so I imagine the new ride system similar to Spiderman at Universal that they're using could do a similar capacity of about 2,000 guests per hour + maybe a flat ride and/or smaller show depending on how much you take from that area.
 

AidenRodriguez731

Well-Known Member
Star Tours is awesome, and I hope it stays. The great tragedy of our most recent trip is that we only got to ride twice.
It's pretty cool but it's just in the most inconvenient space of all time. I think we could get a similar enough experience if they keep plussing up Millenium Falcon to retheme it. I would say go for an Incredibles themed ride with you helping the Incredibles with Syndrome/Omnidroid or something. Could have that whole area around still themed to California since iirc that's where Incredibles takes place. Dare I say a western branch of the Sanctum where a new midnight suns ride would be. Very speculative on if that movie releases/does well but it would be a blast and skirt the Universal copyright.
 

James Alucobond

Well-Known Member
Star Tours is awesome, and I hope it stays. The great tragedy of our most recent trip is that we only got to ride twice.
To ensure it sticks around, it should honestly just get plopped in over at the former Starcruiser entrance as a Batuu travel agency, with First Order Cargo as its gift shop. That plus the planned table service restaurant and rideabout beast would help the land feel more complete and potentially open up a pathway to a new area for development east of Monsters without disrupting IJ.
 

Disgruntled Walt

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
In the Parks
No
To ensure it sticks around, it should honestly just get plopped in over at the former Starcruiser entrance as a Batuu travel agency, with First Order Cargo as its gift shop. That plus the planned table service restaurant and rideabout beast would help the land feel more complete and potentially open up a pathway to a new area for development east of Monsters without disrupting IJ.
I think that would be great, but they'd never do it. Moving rides around isn't exactly something they do, though this one seems really simple. But I'll bet if the doors close on Star Tours, they never reopen.
 

JSchnitz

Well-Known Member
Build the Star Wars land people wanted next to Star Tours on the Indiana Jones/Backlot plot. Original trilogy, Tatooine. Animatronic Jabba, Roxy the Rancor, original characters. Galaxy’s Edge continues as sequel trilogy land.
 

Gusey

Well-Known Member
I do think the new Star Tours scenes last year bought it more time at HS and Disneyland, and that DLP and now Tokyo this year only got the new scenes because they were already in the works
 

James Alucobond

Well-Known Member
Build the Star Wars land people wanted next to Star Tours on the Indiana Jones/Backlot plot. Original trilogy, Tatooine. Animatronic Jabba, Roxy the Rancor, original characters. Galaxy’s Edge continues as sequel trilogy land.
Tatooine is no more compelling than Batuu. It’s basically just Batuu with more sand and fewer trees. In no universe should they build both next to each other. Just abandon the timeline and move in some of the characters people want, or legitimately commit to the timeline and bring in the originally promised entertainment necessary to actually make that pay off.
 

Vegas Disney Fan

Well-Known Member
Star Tours is awesome, and I hope it stays. The great tragedy of our most recent trip is that we only got to ride twice.
We prefer Star Tours to the Millenium Falcon ride, that may change if the Falcon ever starts rotating scenes like ST but we got bored of Falcon after the first half dozen rides.

Star Tours is still the best example of the variability a screen based ride offers, the other screen based rides just keep the same ride year after year. Laugh floor and Crush are great examples also but feel like shows rather than rides.
 

Bill Cipher

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
Yes
So let me get this straight, They spent the last 10 years trying to undo the studio concept by removing The Great Movie Ride for Runaway Railway, The backlot tour, The Pixar Studios area, added the cheap and tacky Toy Story Land and Galaxys Edge. we are losing MuppetVision for an entire Monsters Inc. Land and now for Animation Courtyard they are actually leaning back into the studio concept? They really have no long term plan on how to make this park cohesive, do they? Also, if they are not bringing back the actual animation studio this will basically be a glorified exhibit just like it was before Launch Bay.
While I agree that at first this move seems really counter-intuitive to the park's new "high concept" (being a bit generous calling it that), I honestly don't think it makes the park feel less cohesive. If the park was entirely "enter the worlds of films" then there would be no glue to hold the lands of such a park together. Hollywood Blvd, Sunset Blvd, and Echo Lake all portray an idealized Hollywood and having attractions in those spaces which reflect that idealized Hollywood (including ones about studios making movies) bolsters the significance of those lands, and one's reason for being able to visit the immersive film lands in the park. An experience in this spot that serves as a fanciful look at animation studios is a boon to this park's thematic integrity, imo.

It's still a shame that GMR was removed because it still fit this new identity perfectly and would have continued to be a perfect thesis attraction. Regardless, my main issue with the Animation Courtyard development is that it is yet another project that does not address DHS's primary issue, that being a severe lack of ride-through attraction capacity.
 

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
Star Tours finds away to escape again, like always.

Star tours has been constantly iterated and reinvested in. It’s not old. It continues to receive reinvestment spread around by the film marketing budgets and shared across four resorts.

Any replacement would not empirically be an improvement and probably risk deteriorating it. Or worse, they remove it and nothing I can think of would provide more reliable capacity for the same space. It’s the only workhorse attraction DHS has. It does not even occlude any expansion space.

Its only flaw is that it makes Millenium Falcon look bad.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom