Everest, Pandora, Soarin, Cosmic rewind, Rise, Happily ever after, skyliner, fantasmic, etc. are all more than “better than nothing”.
Pandora was budget cut and should have included another e-ticket, same with Galaxy's Edge (which was inconceivably set in the sequels and not the OG trilogy). On top of that their headlining e-ticket rarely works in full A mode anymore (and the canon blasters still don't work they way they are supposed to based on the last time I rode).
Everest was in development well before 2005 and was so far along it could not be cancelled - it, like Soarin' (which opened in 2005 and was basically done by the time Iger became CEO) were not products of the Iger era of the Walt Disney Company.
The Skyliner is nice, but once again was a value engineered decision because the long-term cost was cheaper than buses - it wasn't a guest convienence thing. AND it let them charge significantly more for Pop, AoA, and CBR, along with helping justify the insane cost for Riviera, which has to be the worst themed hotel Disney has ever done.
Fantasmic opened in 1998 at DHS so I don't really think that's germane to the argument that's being made here - I have no qualms with Fantasmic.
Happily Ever After (arguably the best fireworks show they've ever made) was considered a "temporary" bridge and they had no intention of bringing it back until GSAT scores were so low on Enchantment they were basically forced to do that.
I will concede that Cosmic Rewind is a great ride and ride system, but once again, it was value engineered into an existing pavilion into a park in which it really doesn't match. It would have been great in MK instead of TRON on that plot of land, but they decided they needed a cheap fix in MK so they threw a ride in there they'd already developed.
The reality is that every decision they have made since the time Iger became CEO was a value-engineered decision because it was "good enough" for the average family who visits Disney World once or twice in their life. They can't do that in California, Paris, or Tokyo because there is a major local/repeat visitor cadre that demands new things and excellence (which is why for example, DL's quick service food is so much better than MK).
They haven't built a decently themed hotel in decades (and don't tell me they can't do it because look what they did at Fantasy Springs and the remodel of the Disneyland Hotel in Paris) and apparently every new hotel has to be based on DVC. What they did to the Cabins at the campground was criminal, and the new Poly tower is awful (it wouldn't be bad if it matched the theme - they could have dusted off the original plans for the Poly and built THAT tower and people would have been ecstatic).
The reality is, WDW is seen as the ATM for Disney Parks and Experiences (and overall I believe the company as a whole) and because it continues to generate an outsized amount of profit, they are okay with just being "good enough" in the swamps.