lazyboy97o
Well-Known Member
Are you unfamiliar with the metric that is key to determining a park’s design day capacity?Also "benchmark attractions per guest per hour that you used to determine this number"???
Are you unfamiliar with the metric that is key to determining a park’s design day capacity?Also "benchmark attractions per guest per hour that you used to determine this number"???
I am yes, always willing to be educated thoughAre you unfamiliar with the metric that is key to determining a park’s design day capacity?
No, the best way to deal with lost capacity is to fill it in and not induce additional demand.So it's irrelevant to the argument about replacing TSI because I'm talking about maximizing capacity at that plot of land. The best way to start with that capacity increase would surely be to take over existing capacity? Also the Adventureland Verrandah was replaced with Skipper Canteen, another restaurant?
I haven't noticed a discernible food problem at MK when I was there as I was able to get all of my orders easily within about 5-6 minutes or less? I don't think there's this huge problem you consider it but the answer would be more replacements anyway. I would love to recommend a Carousel of Progress themed restaurant actually over by Tommorrowland terrace perhaps. A rotating menu of favorites from different eras + an experimental "new" menu with present/future dishes sounds like a fun idea.
I’m advocating for it because even if it’s not the most popular attraction, it still has a place in the park. Not every square inch of the park needs to be taken up by an attraction.
Some areas could be used more for theming. Disney has been raising prices for years and I sincerely doubt all of those price increases are because of maintenance needed for RoA;
Stitch’s Great Escape is just sitting there, why don’t they replace that? Guests are paying for that too but not using it? At least the river offers something visually appealing, unlike an empty building.
Fans would also like more attractions instead of World Showcase Lagoon. And it’ll make more money. Doesn’t that mean they should do it?
You still haven’t provided a reason for how Cars fits thematically into Frontierland, just that it makes financial sense.
I grew up going to Disney World, not Disneyland. So why should I have to go there?
And there was a time in which an E ticket roller coaster was figured for spaceship earth.To be fair…. I do believe the insiders who say the rivers have been eyed for replacement for many years - before LL was an even a twinkle in Iger’s eye.
I’m sure many plans have been considered - I had hoped the success of Disneyland would make that the clear winner.
Don’t remind me! They even trademarked the name. They would have done it if they could.And there was a time in which an E ticket roller coaster was figured for spaceship earth.
So use the land outside the park and leave what is actually in the park for guests to enjoy and add ambience, instead of just tearing out RoA for more concrete and fancy rock work?Not every area of the park needs to be an attraction. Yes that is true. But then why can't I point to the unkempt wilderness beyond the railroad as part of the quiet park experience that is still there and available? You like quiet areas and trees.. it's all still out there.
All of the price increases? No. But paying to maintain space that isn't being utilized is definitely part of the admission cost. In addition to paying to keep the underutilized areas running, not utilizing already suitable land for new attractions drives up attraction construction costs dramatically.
They will eventually replace it.
They probably will someday.
Literally means nothing. They could just remove the Frontierland signs or rename the area or decide that they want to abolish themed lands entirely. These rules mean nothing and it makes no difference.
You can go to Paris or Tokyo too. Although I
The boat and the island did not “move thousands+ per hour” Not even close. And they were massively underutilized.
The first plans I saw to remove the island and riverboat were created while Eisner was still CEO. Long before anyone planned to monetize LL.
Im not saying you have to support the decision to close the attractions or the choice of IP for their replacements.
Oh my gosh, I’d forgotten about Project Gemini.And there was a time in which an E ticket roller coaster was figured for spaceship earth.
Between Muppet vision and the liberty Belle these were large capacity attractions that were eliminated because they weren’t capable of generating the additional sweet, sweet lightning Lane revenue.
But hey, with cars land, we’ve got something that probably has half the capacity if even but plenty of lightning Lane revenue.
Between Muppet vision and the liberty Belle these were large capacity attractions that were eliminated because they weren’t capable of generating the additional sweet, sweet lightning Lane revenue.
But hey, with cars land, we’ve got something that probably has half the capacity if even but plenty of lightning Lane revenue.
About 1/3rd I’m guessing?And the capacity it did have was barely being utilized
The max capacity for the boat was 900 per hour. And it hasn’t even came close to that in normal operation for a very very long time.OK big boy what was the capacity?
You know it all, spell it out for the rest of us.
Eisner was too decades ago and nothing happened. It was only when the drug known as lightning lane revenue was injected into the brain trust at Disney did all of this change.
All able to be monetized. You keep dancing around that for some reason. I wonder why…There you go again. The Liberty Belle was not a large capacity attraction. And the capacity it did have was barely being utilized. Stop lying to make your point.
The Cars attraction alone will have higher capacity than the boat, and that’s before you factor in the other three attraction the park will gain.
And it never happened because they were some of the most iconic attractions of the park.There have been numerous plans to remove these underperforming attractions over the last nearly three decades.
If the boat or the island were popular they could have been monetized. They weren’t. Which is why they are gone.All able to be monetized. You keep dancing around that for some reason. I wonder why…
Nope. That’s not why it took so long to finally move forward. Calling them some of the most iconic attractions in the park is more than a little bit hyperbolic.And it never happened because they were some of the most iconic attractions of the park.
Name somethings that’s changed that.
If the boat or the island were popular they could have been monetized. They weren’t. Which is why they are gone.
Lack of demand and popularity is why they are gone. You keep ignoring that.
Obviously the reason any park spends any money to put in anything new is to drive attendance and revenue. That’s why the park exists in the first place.
Really? Muppet vision Jim Henson’s last project, not iconic?Nope. That’s not why it took so long to finally move forward. Calling them some of the most iconic attractions in the park is more than a little bit hyperbolic.
I think it’s pretty clear I was referring to the boat and island. This is after all the cars thread.Really? Muppet vision Jim Henson’s last project, not iconic?
Exactly what part?What a very Six Flags Way of thinking. I guess that’s where we’re at right now.
Something to be proud of I guess…
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.