For the record, I have never said that the parks are gonna die because they are removing an attraction I like. Believe it or not, I understand why Disney is doing this, from their point of view. I know the average park guest is applauding this change, and that's who Disney needs to cater to, to keep making money. I get it. But, that doesn't mean I have to like it, or look forward to what comes next. It's almost like there's this dismissive mindset running through this thread that "the changes are coming, they're gonna be better, and you're just gonna have to swallow it, and we don't care how emotionally invested you were in what is getting removed and you're wrong for not waiting to embrace the change". We've all seen the concept art, we know the IP that this new area will be based on, and based on that, some of us can confidently say that there is no way we will like the new attractions better than we like ROA/TSI, and that seems to annoy some people here. And, I would also like to add that, personally, making this change in itself is not totally disagreeable-it's what they are replacing it with. If they took the Cars IP completely out of the equation, and just had this as the Pacific Northwest wilderness with an offroad ride through it, I would be ok with that. Anyway, rant over.
