psherman42
Well-Known Member
MK does not need its ROA destroyed to show it’s not Disneyland. I don’t recall ever seeing people complaining about Frontierland but I do recall seeing people complain about the Tomorrowland speedway. If they wanted to “give MK a better identity”, why not start there by putting an attraction or two on the speedway footprint and filling the empty space where stitch used to be? They didn’t have to ruin Frontierland. And now if Tomorrowland ever gets an upgrade, it’ll probably be at least a decade for that to happen.^ bingo, MK has spent way too long being the shadow of Disneyland. It needs this and other unique experiences to show it’s not just Florida Disneyland. It needs a better identity and I think this new expansion begins giving it
I doubt it. I don’t see this opening before 2030.At least it should take less than 5 years like the EPCOT debacle.
By this logic, why not gut world showcase lagoon? After all, it’s just wasted space and guests can go to crescent lake if they want water and boats.Fort wilderness, Bay lake, seven seas lagoon add much more to MK as well. If DL removed ROA their entire resort has no more boats.
I would maybe feel a bit better but probably still be against it. Losing so much water (I don’t care what anyone defending this project says but geysers and maybe a waterfall doesn’t make losing the river okay) in favor of mostly concrete and rock work is a mistake. And that’s not even taking the loss of the river boat into consideration. I’m sad that some things that are there more for ambience just don’t matter anymore. Everything is about “capacity” and LLs.I'm not sure if others that opposed this change are in the same camp as myself, but this would not be as egregious if there was no IP tied to it. If it was just a pacific northwest landscape, with some kind of non-IP based "off-road" attraction traversing it, then it would be alot more palatable, IMO. Maybe even have a small section of explorable caves, as an homage to TSI. I don't want to see TSI/ROA go, but I would be ok with the type of replacement I just mentioned. But it is very obvious that Disney management thinks that only new projects with tied-in IP will make them money, and, with the masses that they are now catering to, they're unfortunately probably right.
On a different note, does anyone happen know what is going to happen to the bridge that connects the main walkway in Frontierland to Thunder? The one where you can watch people who just came down the drop at Tiana’s from?