• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

MK Cars-Themed Attractions at Magic Kingdom

Disstevefan1

Well-Known Member
Oh! Ok..... well then....what do we have to discuss? LOL
Seriously if all you want to do is exclaim how wonderful everything is, and what an amazing job everyone is doing managing the parks, and everything is sunshine and lollipops, you should really be on the Disney owned website... It would give their staff writers a break.
JoshInSunshineAndRainbows.jpg
;)
 
Last edited:

Dreamer19

Well-Known Member
Yes. We all love waiting in lines at theme parks with no way to escape them. Makes for an outstanding overall experience.

I can’t wait for Celestial Park in Uni to eventually utilize all that underutilized space.
Good point.

Is there an argument against them filling up all of that open space in front of the castle too?

Why not pave over the ponds? There is a lot of wasted space headed into Tomorrowland too…hmm.
 

Chi84

Premium Member
Do you believe this emerged from a vacuum? That a lot of posters here woke up and said, “Today I want to be sad about something I loved?”
Maybe they didn’t the first few years, but Disney has changed significantly and continues to do so. At some point it does become a choice.

No one knows for certain but I don’t see WDW ever going back to the way it was in the past. If people don’t find it enjoyable now and there’s no indication it will get better, doesn’t the sadness just get exhausting?
 

donaldtoo

Well-Known Member
So would you rather everyone expressed nothing but positivity and happiness with the decisions Disney is making? That's called Fantasyland.

If I don't like something, I'm going to call it out. I think others here feel the same way. If more and more people are complaining, and the negativity seems to be on the rise, what do you think is the reason for that...?

Here's my hypothesis: Disney is doing more and more stuff that people disagree with. The "increased negativity" is Disney's own fault for making stupid decisions.

Yep, if I don’t agree with Disney decisions I’m calling them out…it’s a Disney discussion forum…the good, the bad and the ugly. Based on opinion, of course.
Perhaps some members should start a “Disney Positivity Only” thread…?!
This “Cars” modern off-road racing in a land set in the old west frontier (1870-ish) continues to befuddle me… :cyclops:
And, ditto regarding your last sentence.
 

Gusey

Well-Known Member
As to leaving some water in place - folks understand that space is finite, right? When was the last time that WDW constructed an attraction that was going to be bounded on all sides by guest areas, with three sides already existing? Anything besides the masterpiece that is Journey of Water? Either the ride or the water has to be shortchanged. That’s just reality.
This is the negativity we're talking about. You're saying that Disney are either going to shorten the attraction or the water feature because it's "just reality" when its purely negative speculation on your behalf. It's not reality until the attraction opens. I'm one who prefers to only deal with the information actually presented to us and not think doom and gloom about something I've made up is going to happen
 

TrainsOfDisney

Well-Known Member
Is there an argument against them filling up all of that open space in front of the castle too?
They already did…. There used to be much more open space and water. They filled it in and made space to sell vip fireworks viewing. Since there is very little shade - it’s virtually useless during the day and the fountains they added are incredibly basic.

When first announced I had hopes it would be similar to the gardens at Disneyland Paris - which are beautiful.
 

Dreamer19

Well-Known Member
Why do you think I would want to do that?
I think the current management is greedy and the prices are too high, but the experience is still quite a bit of fun.

I’m perfectly happy to contribute to the site but it concerns me when I see posters say they don’t post much anymore because of the constant negativity.
To be honest, I joined this site because I wanted to discuss what I feel is a decline in quality of the Disney product.

I grew up loving this company and once upon of time would have been right here cheering every decision. I worked for the company for ten years. I still have a lot of friends who work there.

(Just the other day, a current Cast Member came up to me at church and showed me the new “Cars” land design saying “what are they thinking?”)

I don’t have an agenda, as someone else here stated. I care. I want this company to be as great as it was when Walt ran it, or at least as good as it was when Eisner ran it.

I feel I’ve had some good discussions about ideas and direction here. I don’t feel like I’m part of a bunch of Karens wanting to see the Disney manager.

I just care and I’m upset. That’s okay.
 

TheRealSkull

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
No
Yep, if I don’t agree with Disney decisions I’m calling them out…it’s a Disney discussion forum…the good, the bad and the ugly. Based on opinion, of course.
Perhaps some members should start a “Disney Positivity Only” thread…?!
This “Cars” modern off-road racing in a land set in the old west frontier (1870-ish) continues to befuddle me… :cyclops:
And, ditto regarding your last sentence.
I agree with a lot of what you are saying. But to be fair, as much as we don't like it, Frontierland is no longer going to be about the late 1800s anymore.
 

Ayla

Well-Known Member
As long as I’m bloviating… I recently stayed at a Disney World resort for an extended period for the first time in over a decade. Here are a few things that struck me;

No room service except at the Floridian. For the rates Disney charges, that’s utterly unacceptable. Worse, the room service option is still on the in-room phones! Disney just doesn’t care.

No package delivery to resorts. Disney just doesn’t care.

No AP discounts on quick service. Disney just doesn’t care.

Terrible operations at the resorts. The personnel are great and try to do their best, but they are hampered at every turn by simply awful restrictions. Disney just doesn’t care.

A lack of live street performances. The parks feel nowhere near as alive as they once did. Disney just doesn’t care.

And on a slightly different note…

An embarrassing slate of awful and/ or ancient shows, particularly at the Studios. This used to be an area in which Disney excelled. Now… Disney just doesn’t care.

I suspect most of these complaints are old hat to regular guests. As a lobster who just plunged back into the pot after years away, however, the shortcomings were stark. I’ll be honest… I complain a lot on here, but I didn’t realize just how much things had changed for the worse.
Excuse me, sir. This post contains too much negativity (*cough* truth) for this "site" and it must be reined in in order not to besmirch their good name. Sir!
 

Ayla

Well-Known Member
This is the negativity we're talking about. You're saying that Disney are either going to shorten the attraction or the water feature because it's "just reality" when its purely negative speculation on your behalf. It's not reality until the attraction opens. I'm one who prefers to only deal with the information actually presented to us and not think doom and gloom about something I've made up is going to happen
Logical criticism is not negativity. There are a whole lot of people here that need to learn how to be critical thinkers. It is sorely lacking with all this "rah rah Disney is GREAT!!" chorus.
 

Casper Gutman

Well-Known Member
This is the negativity we're talking about. You're saying that Disney are either going to shorten the attraction or the water feature because it's "just reality" when it’s purely negative speculation on your behalf. It's not reality until the attraction opens. I'm one who prefers to only deal with the information actually presented to us and not think doom and gloom about something I've made up is going to happen
Of course - we need to forget the most fundamental rules of physics to avoid “doom and gloom” about the brand. Two objects CAN occupy the same space at the same time!

There are many valid arguments in favor of the Cars ride. This is not one. This is fantasy.
 

donaldtoo

Well-Known Member
I agree with a lot of what you are saying. But to be fair, as much as we don't like it, Frontierland is no longer going to be about the late 1800s anymore.

But, for now anyway, it still is.
The other side of that is, by the time this abomination is complete, all vestiges of Frontierland may have been erased by then…?
We were there in Oct. of ‘23 and June/July of ‘24, and, fortunately, that whole stretch all the way to BTMR (sans TBA, of course) still looks like Frontierland.
Modern off-road racing doesn’t tie in with either old west frontier OR 1920’s TBA.
Where are they going with all this…?!?!?! 🤔 :cyclops:
 

Gusey

Well-Known Member
Of course - we need to forget the most fundamental rules of physics to avoid “doom and gloom” about the brand. Two objects CAN occupy the same space at the same time!

There are many valid arguments in favor of the Cars ride. This is not one. This is fantasy.
I'm not sure how the FACTS we've been presented with can be classed as Fantasy? Even the original concept art showed a water feature directly next to the Frontierland pathway, even if it was obscured by trees. The newer piece of art highlighted the river more.
Plus, it is entirely physically possible for 2 things to share the same space. You can have the river, and the Cars ride on an elevated piece if track above the river, and we know it is a FACT that this ride will feature different elevations
 

Casper Gutman

Well-Known Member
Just another note - I view the parks not only as places to have fun but as vitally important cultural and historical sites and as works of art. This perspective means that ripping out chunks of them IS a big deal and that “people having fun,” while certainly important, in no way compensates for thoughtless, short-sighted changes.

I would argue that Disney parks “matter” as much or more than the most respected museum or revered historic sites.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom