MK Cars-Themed Attractions at Magic Kingdom

Chi84

Premium Member
Oh! Ok..... well then....what do we have to discuss? LOL
Seriously if all you want to do is exclaim how wonderful everything is, and what an amazing job everyone is doing managing the parks, and everything is sunshine and lollipops, you should really be on the Disney owned website... It would give their staff writers a break.
Why do you think I would want to do that?
I think the current management is greedy and the prices are too high, but the experience is still quite a bit of fun.

I’m perfectly happy to contribute to the site but it concerns me when I see posters say they don’t post much anymore because of the constant negativity.
 

Casper Gutman

Well-Known Member
I have to always remind myself that there is a whole world outside of our Disney/Theme parks sphere. Something I might not like may be loved by millions of other people and that's okay I'm not more important than anyone else just because I love the parks. I understand that while I'm not the biggest fan of what's replacing ROA, there is gonna be a generation of kids who will and millions of adults who will love it.
There are millions of adults who would enjoy a dog track or a casino. That really isn’t a defense.

And yes, it is fair to say that someone with an extensive history with the parks will have a more informed opinion about its development. Many guests will enjoy whatever replaces RoA, but a minuscule number will be able to make a meaningful comparison with what came before or form a reliable opinion as to whether they might have enjoyed it more. THEY also aren’t more important then YOU.

And once again - the Cars thing could have been built without destroying a huge section of the park. Disney made a CHOICE.
 

Gusey

Well-Known Member
Oh! Ok..... well then....what do we have to discuss? LOL
Seriously if all you want to do is exclaim how wonderful everything is, and what an amazing job everyone is doing managing the parks, and everything is sunshine and lollipops, you should really be on the Disney owned website... It would give their staff writers a break.
But discussions have to progress. You've been saying the same things since this projects was announced, and even when we get new information its just the same discussion of "I like RoA so I won't like its replacement". We've had confirmation that there will be a significant water pressence with the Cars attraction, plus sections of the national park to explore on foot, and their designing the new attraction so it won't impact on the natural vibes of Frontierland and Liberty Square, particularly with noise. Yet, I keep seeing the same "discussion" that this is a mistake because their getting rid of all the water in the area and it will impact the views and sounds from Frontierland and Liberty Square.
 

Casper Gutman

Well-Known Member
the constant negativity.
Do you believe this emerged from a vacuum? That a lot of posters here woke up and said, “Today I want to be sad about something I loved?” Or is it possible that Disney is making a lot of terrible decisions?

I’d argue this board is special because it has a lot of informed, eloquent, insightful posters with diverse expertise that all love Disney. That’s going to be a group that’s particularly sensitive to and vocal about bad decisions regarding the parks.
 

Casper Gutman

Well-Known Member
But discussions have to progress. You've been saying the same things since this projects was announced, and even when we get new information its just the same discussion of "I like RoA so I won't like its replacement". We've had confirmation that there will be a significant water pressence with the Cars attraction, plus sections of the national park to explore on foot, and their designing the new attraction so it won't impact on the natural vibes of Frontierland and Liberty Square, particularly with noise. Yet, I keep seeing the same "discussion" that this is a mistake because their getting rid of all the water in the area and it will impact the views and sounds from Frontierland and Liberty Square.
Of course it will “impact on the natural vibes of Frontierland and Liberty Square,” they’re ripping out the central element around which both areas were aesthetically and narratively oriented! What a crazy thing to say!

As to leaving some water in place - folks understand that space is finite, right? When was the last time that WDW constructed an attraction that was going to be bounded on all sides by guest areas, with three sides already existing? Anything besides the masterpiece that is Journey of Water? Either the ride or the water has to be shortchanged. That’s just reality.
 

Disstevefan1

Well-Known Member
Oh! Ok..... well then....what do we have to discuss? LOL
Seriously if all you want to do is exclaim how wonderful everything is, and what an amazing job everyone is doing managing the parks, and everything is sunshine and lollipops, you should really be on the Disney owned website... It would give their staff writers a break.
JoshInSunshineAndRainbows.jpg
;)
 
Last edited:

Dreamer19

Well-Known Member
Yes. We all love waiting in lines at theme parks with no way to escape them. Makes for an outstanding overall experience.

I can’t wait for Celestial Park in Uni to eventually utilize all that underutilized space.
Good point.

Is there an argument against them filling up all of that open space in front of the castle too?

Why not pave over the ponds? There is a lot of wasted space headed into Tomorrowland too…hmm.
 

Chi84

Premium Member
Do you believe this emerged from a vacuum? That a lot of posters here woke up and said, “Today I want to be sad about something I loved?”
Maybe they didn’t the first few years, but Disney has changed significantly and continues to do so. At some point it does become a choice.

No one knows for certain but I don’t see WDW ever going back to the way it was in the past. If people don’t find it enjoyable now and there’s no indication it will get better, doesn’t the sadness just get exhausting?
 

donaldtoo

Well-Known Member
So would you rather everyone expressed nothing but positivity and happiness with the decisions Disney is making? That's called Fantasyland.

If I don't like something, I'm going to call it out. I think others here feel the same way. If more and more people are complaining, and the negativity seems to be on the rise, what do you think is the reason for that...?

Here's my hypothesis: Disney is doing more and more stuff that people disagree with. The "increased negativity" is Disney's own fault for making stupid decisions.

Yep, if I don’t agree with Disney decisions I’m calling them out…it’s a Disney discussion forum…the good, the bad and the ugly. Based on opinion, of course.
Perhaps some members should start a “Disney Positivity Only” thread…?!
This “Cars” modern off-road racing in a land set in the old west frontier (1870-ish) continues to befuddle me… :cyclops:
And, ditto regarding your last sentence.
 

Gusey

Well-Known Member
As to leaving some water in place - folks understand that space is finite, right? When was the last time that WDW constructed an attraction that was going to be bounded on all sides by guest areas, with three sides already existing? Anything besides the masterpiece that is Journey of Water? Either the ride or the water has to be shortchanged. That’s just reality.
This is the negativity we're talking about. You're saying that Disney are either going to shorten the attraction or the water feature because it's "just reality" when its purely negative speculation on your behalf. It's not reality until the attraction opens. I'm one who prefers to only deal with the information actually presented to us and not think doom and gloom about something I've made up is going to happen
 

TrainsOfDisney

Well-Known Member
Is there an argument against them filling up all of that open space in front of the castle too?
They already did…. There used to be much more open space and water. They filled it in and made space to sell vip fireworks viewing. Since there is very little shade - it’s virtually useless during the day and the fountains they added are incredibly basic.

When first announced I had hopes it would be similar to the gardens at Disneyland Paris - which are beautiful.
 

Dreamer19

Well-Known Member
Why do you think I would want to do that?
I think the current management is greedy and the prices are too high, but the experience is still quite a bit of fun.

I’m perfectly happy to contribute to the site but it concerns me when I see posters say they don’t post much anymore because of the constant negativity.
To be honest, I joined this site because I wanted to discuss what I feel is a decline in quality of the Disney product.

I grew up loving this company and once upon of time would have been right here cheering every decision. I worked for the company for ten years. I still have a lot of friends who work there.

(Just the other day, a current Cast Member came up to me at church and showed me the new “Cars” land design saying “what are they thinking?”)

I don’t have an agenda, as someone else here stated. I care. I want this company to be as great as it was when Walt ran it, or at least as good as it was when Eisner ran it.

I feel I’ve had some good discussions about ideas and direction here. I don’t feel like I’m part of a bunch of Karens wanting to see the Disney manager.

I just care and I’m upset. That’s okay.
 

TheRealSkull

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
No
Yep, if I don’t agree with Disney decisions I’m calling them out…it’s a Disney discussion forum…the good, the bad and the ugly. Based on opinion, of course.
Perhaps some members should start a “Disney Positivity Only” thread…?!
This “Cars” modern off-road racing in a land set in the old west frontier (1870-ish) continues to befuddle me… :cyclops:
And, ditto regarding your last sentence.
I agree with a lot of what you are saying. But to be fair, as much as we don't like it, Frontierland is no longer going to be about the late 1800s anymore.
 

Ayla

Well-Known Member
As long as I’m bloviating… I recently stayed at a Disney World resort for an extended period for the first time in over a decade. Here are a few things that struck me;

No room service except at the Floridian. For the rates Disney charges, that’s utterly unacceptable. Worse, the room service option is still on the in-room phones! Disney just doesn’t care.

No package delivery to resorts. Disney just doesn’t care.

No AP discounts on quick service. Disney just doesn’t care.

Terrible operations at the resorts. The personnel are great and try to do their best, but they are hampered at every turn by simply awful restrictions. Disney just doesn’t care.

A lack of live street performances. The parks feel nowhere near as alive as they once did. Disney just doesn’t care.

And on a slightly different note…

An embarrassing slate of awful and/ or ancient shows, particularly at the Studios. This used to be an area in which Disney excelled. Now… Disney just doesn’t care.

I suspect most of these complaints are old hat to regular guests. As a lobster who just plunged back into the pot after years away, however, the shortcomings were stark. I’ll be honest… I complain a lot on here, but I didn’t realize just how much things had changed for the worse.
Excuse me, sir. This post contains too much negativity (*cough* truth) for this "site" and it must be reined in in order not to besmirch their good name. Sir!
 

Ayla

Well-Known Member
This is the negativity we're talking about. You're saying that Disney are either going to shorten the attraction or the water feature because it's "just reality" when its purely negative speculation on your behalf. It's not reality until the attraction opens. I'm one who prefers to only deal with the information actually presented to us and not think doom and gloom about something I've made up is going to happen
Logical criticism is not negativity. There are a whole lot of people here that need to learn how to be critical thinkers. It is sorely lacking with all this "rah rah Disney is GREAT!!" chorus.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom