WDWFREAK53
Well-Known Member
Key word, "domestic"Not a fair comparison considering the very different budgets those two parks had. Would make more sense to compare to Shanghai Disneyland.
Key word, "domestic"Not a fair comparison considering the very different budgets those two parks had. Would make more sense to compare to Shanghai Disneyland.
It's definitely the former. If you watch the contained bat in the queue leading up to this area it laughs at one point and while she's talking, if you pay attention to the monitors that show Dracula, he's up to something.In the Monsters Unchained second pre-show, when Victoria says "... that wasn't us." Is she referring to the equipment shutting off - as in Dracula shut it off? Or is she saying that her 2.0 monster getting angry and smashing the equipment and her yelling at him isn't how they normally are?
Yes, it is humorous to ask about it.How's their floor lighting doing?
Unfortunately, Universal had to hire a lot of brand new team members to fill the need at Epic, and it shows. They’re not good and information and implementation of procedures is a mess.
That said, guest service is still an area where Disney absolutely beats Universal. The average Disney CM is pleasant. The average Universal TM is apathetic and rude. There are of course bad Disney CMs and great Universal TMs, but on average, you are more likely to have positive interactions with Disney CMs.
I went 5/4 and I'm glad I did everything (except DK which seemed to only operate like for 10% of the day) but would agree it just seems like they're not ready. The rides are great, never saw a show, food wasn't bad (way way better than what the other UO parks offer) but honestly nothing mind blowing. Maybe Disney had Intel and never panicked and that's why they decided cool kid summer could combat epic lol
I think classifying the Monsters area as IP is a bit of a stretch as nobody has seen those movies in theaters unless they were born literally 100 years ago.
Yeah, I have been cautious about posting this lest it comes as a criticism or raining on people's parade, but I also have the same impression that the pre-opening hype that suggested this was going to be a game changer has more or less dissipated by now. All the talk on the other forums that Disney was heading for disaster for not rushing a bunch of new additions to open against Epic also seems to have mostly gone quiet. That's not to say the park has been received poorly, more that it has been received more in line with what you would expect of a new theme park from Universal or Disney in the US rather than as a new revelation. Also notable that certain things like this being the Uni park that would finally permit decent nighttime fireworks or dragons flying overhead has all sort of been pushed off to "they're working on it..."It's been interesting to watch--and go to--Epic this year. Two months ago, the park was poised to be one of the premiere parks in the US. But it seems like the excitement has come and gone. Not everything working. Team member issues. Very hot. Some long lines and low capacity rides. The Potter area is still amazing--probably the best art directed land anywhere in the world. And Le Cirque Arcanus is top shelf. But there were months of technical rehearsals. It seems like things should be operating better by now, but not all team members seem fully trained and some of the rides still have issues, which is forgivable. It takes teams a while to get complex rides fully functional. I did enjoy my time there. But I really don't think about my visits to the park very much. When I compare this to the months of public excitement for Galaxy's Edge after it opened--even with out the full entertainment package at GE--I sorta wonder how did Epic not fully capture this moment? That's mostly what I'm wondering--where were the missteps, as this should've fully been Epic's summer, but a few weeks after opening, it doesn't feel that way.
Yeah, I have been cautious about posting this lest it comes as a criticism or raining on people's parade, but I also have the same impression that the pre-opening hype that suggested this was going to be a game changer has more or less dissipated by now. All the talk on the other forums that Disney was heading for disaster for not rushing a bunch of new additions to open against Epic also seems to have mostly gone quiet. That's not to say the park has been received poorly, more that it has been received more in line with what you would expect of a new theme park from Universal or Disney in the US rather than as a new revelation. Also notable that certain things like this being the Uni park that would finally permit decent nighttime fireworks or dragons flying overhead has all sort of been pushed off to "they're working on it..."
Again, I think the park has been well-received. I'm just not sure anyone is still suggesting it raises the bar for what a theme park can be. In that sense, it kind of reminds me of Volcano Bay which was supposed to be such an elevated version of a water park that it was basically a theme park. Then it opened and people mostly liked it, but it was a water park with plusses and minuses like they all have.
Glad it's not just me who has felt this way.I’ve been thinking this lately also, but didn’t want to bring it up.
All of this makes sense.I think there's a lot of factors to consider.
One of them being that there were 2.5 months of previews, and a very significant number of people that were hyped about the park actually got to see it during that time. For the final few weeks, the park was essentially already open, with anyone being able to buy a ticket.
Two, there wasn't really like a big IP to draw people in in the sense that it was something that hadn't been done before. This was the third Super Nintendo World to open, and while a new area, it was still the third Potter area in Orlando. Dark Universe and HTTYD aren't exactly IPs that will draw hoards of people in just for them. While I firmly maintain that a great theme park land or attraction does not have to be based on a popular or even good IP as long as it itself is good (for example, the Avatar films are kind of whatever but the land and FoP are great), DU and HTTYD might have fared better in an established park than as anchors for a new park.
Three - the high price plus inability to bundle plus no AP, combined with the fact that many people are holding off assuming the park is a madhouse = a park that is relatively quiet.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.